These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28609471)

  • 1. Finite element analysis of 6 large PMMA skull reconstructions: A multi-criteria evaluation approach.
    Ridwan-Pramana A; Marcián P; Borák L; Narra N; Forouzanfar T; Wolff J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179325. PubMed ID: 28609471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Modelling and structural analysis of skull/cranial implant: beyond mid-line deformities.
    Bogu VP; Kumar YR; Kumar Khanara A
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2017; 19(1):125-131. PubMed ID: 28552926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. FEM assisted evaluation of PMMA and Ti6Al4V as materials for cranioplasty resulting mechanical behaviour and the neurocranial protection.
    Tsouknidas A; Maropoulos S; Savvakis S; Michailidis N
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2011; 21(3):139-47. PubMed ID: 22072078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of cranial reconstruction utilizing various implant materials: finite element study.
    Shash YH
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2024 Aug; 35(1):50. PubMed ID: 39136804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Long-term clinical outcome analysis of poly-methyl-methacrylate cranioplasty for large skull defects.
    Jaberi J; Gambrell K; Tiwana P; Madden C; Finn R
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 71(2):e81-8. PubMed ID: 23351772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Structural and mechanical implications of PMMA implant shape and interface geometry in cranioplasty--A finite element study.
    Ridwan-Pramana A; Marcián P; Borák L; Narra N; Forouzanfar T; Wolff J
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Jan; 44(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 26646634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Technical considerations in the use of polymethylmethacrylate in cranioplasty.
    Lara WC; Schweitzer J; Lewis RP; Odum BC; Edlich RF; Gampper TJ
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 1998; 8(1):43-53. PubMed ID: 10177458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical performance of cranial implants with different thicknesses and material properties: A finite element study.
    Marcián P; Narra N; Borák L; Chamrad J; Wolff J
    Comput Biol Med; 2019 Jun; 109():43-52. PubMed ID: 31035070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanical behaviour of reconstructed defected skull with custom PEEK implant and Titanium fixture plates under dynamic loading conditions using FEM.
    Jindal P; Bharti J; Gupta V; Dhami SS
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2023 Oct; 146():106063. PubMed ID: 37556925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of locally manufactured patient-specific custom made implants for cranial defects using a silicone mould.
    Vlok AJ; Naidoo S; Kamat AS; Lamprecht D
    S Afr J Surg; 2018 Sep; 56(3):38-42. PubMed ID: 30264941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intraoperative template-molded bone flap reconstruction for patient-specific cranioplasty.
    Marbacher S; Andereggen L; Erhardt S; Fathi AR; Fandino J; Raabe A; Beck J
    Neurosurg Rev; 2012 Oct; 35(4):527-35; discussion 535. PubMed ID: 22391771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simplified technique for polymethyl methacrylate cranioplasty: combined cotton stacking and finger fracture method.
    Kung WM; Lin MS
    Brain Inj; 2012; 26(13-14):1737-42. PubMed ID: 22759077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Properties of an In Vivo Fractured Poly(Methyl Methacrylate) Cranioplasty After 15 Years.
    van de Vijfeijken SECM; Münker TJAG; de Jager N; Vandertop WP; Becking AG; Kleverlaan CJ;
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Mar; 123():e60-e68. PubMed ID: 30447447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Customized Technique of Cranioplasty for Patients with Large Skull Defects: A Technical Note.
    Metwali H; Hassanin M; Ibrahim T
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Apr; 148():110-114. PubMed ID: 33422719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Novel composite implant in craniofacial bone reconstruction.
    Peltola MJ; Vallittu PK; Vuorinen V; Aho AA; Puntala A; Aitasalo KM
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Feb; 269(2):623-8. PubMed ID: 21630063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of polymethylmethacrylate adhesion: a comparison of direct onlay versus screw anchoring techniques.
    Nikolis A; Malhotra G; Tiftikcioglu Y; Gupta A; Kelly C; Jackson IT
    J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):366-71. PubMed ID: 19276830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simultaneous repair of two large cranial defects using rapid prototyping and custom computer-designed titanium plates: a case report.
    Morrison DA; Guy DT; Day RE; Lee GY
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Nov; 225(11):1108-12. PubMed ID: 22292209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cranial reconstruction with prefabricated 3D implant after a gunshot injury: A case report.
    Malivuković A; Novaković N; Lepić M; Minić L; Stepić N; Đorđević B; Rasulić L
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 2016 Aug; 73(8):783-7. PubMed ID: 29328616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cranioplasty Enhanced by Three-Dimensional Printing: Custom-Made Three-Dimensional-Printed Titanium Implants for Skull Defects.
    Park EK; Lim JY; Yun IS; Kim JS; Woo SH; Kim DS; Shim KW
    J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 27(4):943-9. PubMed ID: 27192643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patient-specific polymethylmethacrylate prostheses for secondary reconstruction of large calvarial defects: A retrospective feasibility study of a new intraoperative moulding device for cranioplasty.
    Moser M; Schmid R; Schindel R; Hildebrandt G
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2017 Feb; 45(2):295-303. PubMed ID: 28011181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.