These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28610689)
21. Commissioning of pencil beam and Monte Carlo dose engines for non-isocentric treatments in scanned proton beam therapy. Carlino A; Böhlen T; Vatnitsky S; Grevillot L; Osorio J; Dreindl R; Palmans H; Stock M; Kragl G Phys Med Biol; 2019 Aug; 64(17):17NT01. PubMed ID: 31342920 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Dose calculation accuracy in particle therapy: Comparing carbon ions with protons. Ruangchan S; Palmans H; Knäusl B; Georg D; Clausen M Med Phys; 2021 Nov; 48(11):7333-7345. PubMed ID: 34482555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Monte Carlo simulation-based patient-specific QA using machine log files for line-scanning proton radiation therapy. Jeon C; Lee J; Shin J; Cheon W; Ahn S; Jo K; Han Y Med Phys; 2023 Nov; 50(11):7139-7153. PubMed ID: 37756652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Quantifying the effect of air gap, depth, and range shifter thickness on TPS dosimetric accuracy in superficial PBS proton therapy. Shirey RJ; Wu HT J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):164-173. PubMed ID: 29239528 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fast MCsquare-Based Independent Dose Verification Platform for Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy. Liu C; Ho MW; Park J; Hsi WC; Liang X; Li Z; Song Y; Feng H; Zhang Y Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2021; 20():15330338211033076. PubMed ID: 34338058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Experiments and Monte Carlo simulations on multiple Coulomb scattering of protons. Verbeek N; Wulff J; Janson M; Bäumer C; Zahid S; Timmermann B; Brualla L Med Phys; 2021 Jun; 48(6):3186-3199. PubMed ID: 33772808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Two-dimensional pencil beam scaling: an improved proton dose algorithm for heterogeneous media. Szymanowski H; Oelfke U Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(18):3313-30. PubMed ID: 12375823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical implementation of full Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton beam therapy. Paganetti H; Jiang H; Parodi K; Slopsema R; Engelsman M Phys Med Biol; 2008 Sep; 53(17):4825-53. PubMed ID: 18701772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. AAA and PBC calculation accuracy in the surface build-up region in tangential beam treatments. Phantom and breast case study with the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE. Panettieri V; Barsoum P; Westermark M; Brualla L; Lax I Radiother Oncol; 2009 Oct; 93(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 19541380 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Impact of dose engine algorithm in pencil beam scanning proton therapy for breast cancer. Tommasino F; Fellin F; Lorentini S; Farace P Phys Med; 2018 Jun; 50():7-12. PubMed ID: 29891097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of GATE-RTion (GATE/Geant4) Monte Carlo simulation settings for proton pencil beam scanning quality assurance. Winterhalter C; Taylor M; Boersma D; Elia A; Guatelli S; Mackay R; Kirkby K; Maigne L; Ivanchenko V; Resch AF; Sarrut D; Sitch P; Vidal M; Grevillot L; Aitkenhead A Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5817-5828. PubMed ID: 32967037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of dose calculation algorithms in slab phantoms with cortical bone equivalent heterogeneities. Carrasco P; Jornet N; Duch MA; Panettieri V; Weber L; Eudaldo T; Ginjaume M; Ribas M Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3323-33. PubMed ID: 17879796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Advanced kernel methods vs. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for high energy photon beams. Fotina I; Winkler P; Künzler T; Reiterer J; Simmat I; Georg D Radiother Oncol; 2009 Dec; 93(3):645-53. PubMed ID: 19926153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Millisecond speed deep learning based proton dose calculation with Monte Carlo accuracy. Pastor-Serrano O; Perkó Z Phys Med Biol; 2022 May; 67(10):. PubMed ID: 35447605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Benchmarking analytical calculations of proton doses in heterogeneous matter. Ciangaru G; Polf JC; Bues M; Smith AR Med Phys; 2005 Dec; 32(12):3511-23. PubMed ID: 16475750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. On the dosimetric behaviour of photon dose calculation algorithms in the presence of simple geometric heterogeneities: comparison with Monte Carlo calculations. Fogliata A; Vanetti E; Albers D; Brink C; Clivio A; Knöös T; Nicolini G; Cozzi L Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(5):1363-85. PubMed ID: 17301460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A comparison of two pencil beam scanning treatment planning systems for proton therapy. Langner UW; Mundis M; Strauss D; Zhu M; Mossahebi S J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):156-163. PubMed ID: 29205763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Extended in-field and out-of-field validation of a compact Monte Carlo model of an IBA PROTEUS Colson D; Blommaert J; Poels K; De Saint-Hubert M; Reniers B; Depuydt T Phys Med Biol; 2023 Oct; 68(21):. PubMed ID: 37844576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Clinical validation of a GPU-based Monte Carlo dose engine of a commercial treatment planning system for pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Fracchiolla F; Engwall E; Janson M; Tamm F; Lorentini S; Fellin F; Bertolini M; Algranati C; Righetto R; Farace P; Amichetti M; Schwarz M Phys Med; 2021 Aug; 88():226-234. PubMed ID: 34311160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of inhomogeneity in a patient's body on the accuracy of the pencil beam algorithm in comparison to Monte Carlo. Yamashita T; Akagi T; Aso T; Kimura A; Sasaki T Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(22):7673-88. PubMed ID: 23123683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]