These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28611325)

  • 1. Esthetic preferences of laypersons of different cultures and races with regard to smile attractiveness.
    Sadrhaghighi AH; Zarghami A; Sadrhaghighi S; Mohammadi A; Eskandarinezhad M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(2):156-161. PubMed ID: 28611325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Esthetic perception of smile components by orthodontists, general dentists, dental students, artists, and laypersons.
    Sadrhaghighi H; Zarghami A; Sadrhaghighi S; Eskandarinezhad M
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2017 Nov; 8(4):. PubMed ID: 27590143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the perception of smile esthetics by laypersons, dental students and dental practitioners.
    Cracel-Nogueira F; Pinho T
    Int Orthod; 2013 Dec; 11(4):432-44. PubMed ID: 24427802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Smile attractiveness perception regarding buccal corridor size among different facial types.
    Mollabashi V; Abolvardi M; Akhlaghian M; Ghaffari MI
    Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(3):305-312. PubMed ID: 30328309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The acceptability of variations in smile arc and buccal corridor space.
    Parekh S; Fields HW; Beck FM; Rosenstiel SF
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2007 Feb; 10(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 17284243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Smile attractiveness related to buccal corridor space in 3 different facial types: A perception of 3 ethnic groups of Malaysians.
    Nimbalkar S; Oh YY; Mok RY; Tioh JY; Yew KJ; Patil PG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):252-256. PubMed ID: 29551374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Esthetics and smile characteristics evaluated by laypersons.
    McLeod C; Fields HW; Hechter F; Wiltshire W; Rody W; Christensen J
    Angle Orthod; 2011 Mar; 81(2):198-205. PubMed ID: 21208069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Smile attractiveness of patients treated for congenitally missing maxillary lateral incisors as rated by dentists, laypersons, and the patients themselves.
    De-Marchi LM; Pini NI; Ramos AL; Pascotto RC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):540-6. PubMed ID: 24725615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Smile esthetics from patients' perspectives for faces of varying attractiveness.
    Chang CA; Fields HW; Beck FM; Springer NC; Firestone AR; Rosenstiel S; Christensen JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Oct; 140(4):e171-80. PubMed ID: 21967955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of maxillary incisor edge asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons.
    Machado AW; Moon W; Gandini LG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 May; 143(5):658-64. PubMed ID: 23631967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Width/Length Ratio in Maxillary Anterior Teeth. Comparative Study of Esthetic Preferences among Professionals and Laypersons.
    Álvarez-Álvarez L; Orozco-Varo A; Arroyo-Cruz G; Jiménez-Castellanos E
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Apr; 28(4):416-420. PubMed ID: 28513973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Buccal corridors and smile esthetics.
    Moore T; Southard KA; Casko JS; Qian F; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Feb; 127(2):208-13; quiz 261. PubMed ID: 15750540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of the golden ratio in pleasing smiles.
    Nikgoo A; Alavi K; Alavi K; Mirfazaelian A
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 19885425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception of smile esthetics among Indian dental professionals and laypersons.
    Kumar S; Gandhi S; Valiathan A
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):295. PubMed ID: 22945732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perception of smile esthetics by laypeople of different ages.
    Sriphadungporn C; Chamnannidiadha N
    Prog Orthod; 2017 Dec; 18(1):8. PubMed ID: 28317085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of the attractiveness of different gingival zeniths in smile esthetics.
    Nomura S; Freitas KMS; Silva PPCD; Valarelli FP; Cançado RH; Freitas MR; Oliveira RCG; Oliveira RCG
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2018; 23(5):47-57. PubMed ID: 30427493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of vertical positions of anterior teeth on smile esthetics in Japanese and korean orthodontists and orthodontic patients.
    Ioi H; Kang S; Shimomura T; Kim SS; Park SB; Son WS; Takahashi I
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Aug; 25(4):274-82. PubMed ID: 23910186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Analysis of the esthetic preferences of Spanish laypersons and dentists regarding the different width proportions of the maxillary anterior teeth.
    Rodríguez-López S; Escobedo Martínez MF; García-Pola M; Junquera LM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 May; 129(5):778-786. PubMed ID: 34452740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Aesthetic perception of the vertical position of the incisal edges of the maxillary lateral incisors in the smile arch].
    Stolz S; Lefebvre F; Bolender Y; Kanter D
    Orthod Fr; 2017 Sep; 88(3):251-261. PubMed ID: 29043973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Smile characterization by U.S. white, U.S. Asian Indian, and Indian populations.
    Sharma N; Rosenstiel SF; Fields HW; Beck FM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 May; 107(5):327-35. PubMed ID: 22546311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.