312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28611329)
1. Comparative evaluation of shaping ability of V-Taper 2H, ProTaper Next, and HyFlex CM in curved canals using cone-beam computed tomography: An
Shenoi PR; Luniya DA; Badole GP; Makade CS; Kubde R; Khode RT
Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(2):181-186. PubMed ID: 28611329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of ProTaper Next, iRaCe and Hyflex CM rotary NiTi files in severely curved root canals.
Saber SE; Nagy MM; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2015 Feb; 48(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 24697590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative study of different novel nickel-titanium rotary systems for root canal preparation in severely curved root canals.
Capar ID; Ertas H; Ok E; Arslan H; Ertas ET
J Endod; 2014 Jun; 40(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 24862716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Geometric analysis of root canals prepared by four rotary NiTi shaping systems.
Hashem AA; Ghoneim AG; Lutfy RA; Foda MY; Omar GA
J Endod; 2012 Jul; 38(7):996-1000. PubMed ID: 22703669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Shaping ability of two nickel-titanium instruments activated by continuous rotation or adaptive motion: a micro-computed tomography study.
Pedullà E; Plotino G; Grande NM; Avarotti G; Gambarini G; Rapisarda E; Mannocci F
Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Nov; 20(8):2227-2233. PubMed ID: 26876735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Shaping ability of BioRace, ProTaper NEXT and Genius nickel-titanium instruments in curved canals of mandibular molars: a MicroCT study.
Drukteinis S; Peciuliene V; Dummer PMH; Hupp J
Int Endod J; 2019 Jan; 52(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 29858500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measure and compare the Degree of Root Canal Transportation and Canal-centering ability of Twisted, ProTaper, and Conventional Stainless Steel K Files using Spiral Computed Tomography: An in vitro Study.
Rejula F; Christalin R; Ahmed W; Dinakaran S; Gopinathan AS; Babu A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Jun; 18(6):463-469. PubMed ID: 28621275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Canal Transportation, Centering Ratio by Cone-beam Computed Tomography after Preparation with Different File Systems.
Uzunoglu E; Turker SA
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2015 May; 16(5):360-5. PubMed ID: 26162254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Shaping ability of ProTaper Gold and ProTaper Universal files by using cone-beam computed tomography.
Elnaghy AM; Elsaka SE
Indian J Dent Res; 2016; 27(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 27054859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Next instruments with and without glide path.
Elnaghy AM; Elsaka SE
J Endod; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2053-6. PubMed ID: 25301350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative Evaluation of Root Canal Centering Ability of ProTaper, Mtwo, WaveOne, and Reciproc Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography:
Remya M; Singh P; Varughese A; Joseph A; Chandran P; Subramanian D; Kumar SV
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2022 Sep; 23(6):589-592. PubMed ID: 36259296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of canal transportation and centering ability of rotary protaper, one shape system and wave one system using cone beam computed tomography: An in vitro study.
Tambe VH; Nagmode PS; Abraham S; Patait M; Lahoti PV; Jaju N
J Conserv Dent; 2014 Nov; 17(6):561-5. PubMed ID: 25506145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cone-beam computed tomographic analysis of apical transportation and centering ratio of ProTaper and XP-endo Shaper NiTi rotary systems in curved canals: an in vitro study.
Karkehabadi H; Siahvashi Z; Shokri A; Haji Hasani N
BMC Oral Health; 2021 May; 21(1):277. PubMed ID: 34034735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative evaluation of the shaping ability of two different nickel-titanium rotary files in curved root canals of extracted human molar teeth.
Ferrara G; Taschieri S; Corbella S; Ceci C; Del Fabbro M; Machtou P
J Investig Clin Dent; 2017 Feb; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 26343421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of preparation of curved root canals with Hyflex CM and Revo-S rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
Bürklein S; Börjes L; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2014 May; 47(5):470-6. PubMed ID: 23998461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computed tomography evaluation of rotary systems on the root canal transportation and centering ability.
Pagliosa A; Sousa-Neto MD; Versiani MA; Raucci-Neto W; Silva-Sousa YT; Alfredo E
Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 25715038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness of TRUShape and ProTaper Next systems in curved root canals using micro-computed tomography.
Elnaghy AM; Al-Dharrab AA; Abbas HM; Elsaka SE
Quintessence Int; 2017; 48(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 27669727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Micro-computed tomography evaluation of the preparation of mesiobuccal root canals in maxillary first molars with Hyflex CM, Twisted Files, and K3 instruments.
Zhao D; Shen Y; Peng B; Haapasalo M
J Endod; 2013 Mar; 39(3):385-8. PubMed ID: 23402512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of root canal transportation induced by three rotary systems with noncutting tips using computed tomography.
Özer SY
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Feb; 111(2):244-50. PubMed ID: 21167759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Alterations in the Surface Topographies of HyFlex CM and HyFlex EDM Nickel-titanium Files after Root Canal Preparation: A Three-dimensional Optical Profilometry Study.
Uslu G; Özyürek T; Yılmaz K
J Endod; 2018 Jan; 44(1):115-119. PubMed ID: 29032817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
