BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28612163)

  • 1. Repeatability and reproducibility of 2D and 3D hepatic MR elastography with rigid and flexible drivers at end-expiration and end-inspiration in healthy volunteers.
    Wang K; Manning P; Szeverenyi N; Wolfson T; Hamilton G; Middleton MS; Vaida F; Yin M; Glaser K; Ehman RL; Sirlin CB
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2017 Dec; 42(12):2843-2854. PubMed ID: 28612163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Magnetic resonance elastography of the supraspinatus muscle: A preliminary study on test-retest repeatability and wave quality with different frequencies and image filtering.
    Ito D; Numano T; Ueki T; Habe T; Maeno T; Takamoto K; Igarashi K; Maharjan S; Mizuhara K; Nishijo H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Sep; 71():27-36. PubMed ID: 32325234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of breath holding at the end of the inspiration and expiration phases on liver stiffness measured by 2D-MR elastography.
    Ren H; Yang D; Xu H; Pang K; Shi Y; Guan Q; Yang Z
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2021 Jun; 46(6):2516-2526. PubMed ID: 33386913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of breath-hold, respiratory navigated and free-breathing MR elastography of the liver.
    Murphy IG; Graves MJ; Reid S; Patterson AJ; Patterson I; Priest AN; Lomas DJ
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Apr; 37():46-50. PubMed ID: 27746391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. MR elastography for noninvasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis: reproducibility of the examination and reproducibility and repeatability of the liver stiffness value measurement.
    Lee Yj; Lee JM; Lee JE; Lee KB; Lee ES; Yoon JH; Yu MH; Baek JH; Shin CI; Han JK; Choi BI
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Feb; 39(2):326-31. PubMed ID: 23589232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid MR elastography of the liver for subsecond stiffness sampling.
    Anders M; Meyer T; Warmuth C; Pfeuffer J; Tzschaetzsch H; Herthum H; Shahryari M; Degenhardt K; Wieben O; Schmitter S; Schulz-Menger J; Schaeffter T; Braun J; Sack I
    Magn Reson Med; 2024 Jan; 91(1):312-324. PubMed ID: 37705467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of Standard Breath-Held, Free-Breathing, and Compressed Sensing 2D Gradient-Recalled Echo MR Elastography Techniques for Evaluating Liver Stiffness.
    Morin CE; Dillman JR; Serai SD; Trout AT; Tkach JA; Wang H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Dec; 211(6):W279-W287. PubMed ID: 30300003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abdominal MR elastography with multiple driver arrays: performance and repeatability.
    Chen J; Chen J; Heilman JA; Glaser KJ; Grimm RC; Owusu N; Qiu C; Ehman RL; Yin M
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2023 Jun; 48(6):1945-1954. PubMed ID: 36928333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single Breath-Hold MR Elastography for Fast Biomechanical Probing of Pancreatic Stiffness.
    van Schelt AS; Gottwald LM; Wassenaar NPM; Runge JH; Sinkus R; Stoker J; Nederveen AJ; Schrauben EM
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 Feb; 59(2):688-698. PubMed ID: 37194646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Spin-echo Echo-planar Imaging MR Elastography versus Gradient-echo MR Elastography for Assessment of Liver Stiffness in Children and Young Adults Suspected of Having Liver Disease.
    Serai SD; Dillman JR; Trout AT
    Radiology; 2017 Mar; 282(3):761-770. PubMed ID: 27715486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Magnetic Resonance Elastography of the Liver: Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison of Gradient Echo and Spin Echo Echoplanar Imaging Sequences.
    Wagner M; Besa C; Bou Ayache J; Yasar TK; Bane O; Fung M; Ehman RL; Taouli B
    Invest Radiol; 2016 Sep; 51(9):575-81. PubMed ID: 26982699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MR elastography of healthy liver parenchyma: Normal value and reliability of the liver stiffness value measurement.
    Lee DH; Lee JM; Han JK; Choi BI
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Nov; 38(5):1215-23. PubMed ID: 23281116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Liver Stiffness Measurements with MR Elastography: Agreement and Repeatability across Imaging Systems, Field Strengths, and Pulse Sequences.
    Trout AT; Serai S; Mahley AD; Wang H; Zhang Y; Zhang B; Dillman JR
    Radiology; 2016 Dec; 281(3):793-804. PubMed ID: 27285061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantification of aortic stiffness using magnetic resonance elastography: Measurement reproducibility, pulse wave velocity comparison, changes over cardiac cycle, and relationship with age.
    Kenyhercz WE; Raterman B; Illapani VS; Dowell J; Mo X; White RD; Kolipaka A
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 May; 75(5):1920-6. PubMed ID: 26096227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interplatform reproducibility of liver and spleen stiffness measured with MR elastography.
    Yasar TK; Wagner M; Bane O; Besa C; Babb JS; Kannengiesser S; Fung M; Ehman RL; Taouli B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 May; 43(5):1064-72. PubMed ID: 26469708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantification of breast stiffness using MR elastography at 3 Tesla with a soft sternal driver: A reproducibility study.
    Hawley JR; Kalra P; Mo X; Raterman B; Yee LD; Kolipaka A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 May; 45(5):1379-1384. PubMed ID: 27779802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Short- and midterm repeatability of magnetic resonance elastography in healthy volunteers at 3.0 T.
    Shi Y; Guo Q; Xia F; Sun J; Gao Y
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jul; 32(6):665-70. PubMed ID: 24650683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Magnetic resonance elastography of the brain: A study of feasibility and reproducibility using an ergonomic pillow-like passive driver.
    Huang X; Chafi H; Matthews KL; Carmichael O; Li T; Miao Q; Wang S; Jia G
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Jun; 59():68-76. PubMed ID: 30858002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intra-patient comparison of 3D and 2D magnetic resonance elastography techniques for assessment of liver stiffness.
    Catania R; Lopes Vendrami C; Bolster BD; Niemzcura R; Borhani AA; Miller FH
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Mar; 47(3):998-1008. PubMed ID: 34982182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducibility of hepatic MR elastography across field strengths, pulse sequences, scan intervals, and readers.
    Kim HJ; Kim B; Yu HJ; Huh J; Lee JH; Lee SS; Kim KW; Kim JK
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Jan; 45(1):107-115. PubMed ID: 31720766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.