96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28613841)
1. Estimating a Representative Value and Proportion of True Zeros for Censored Analytical Data with Applications to Contaminated Site Assessment.
Haslauer CP; Meyer JR; Bárdossy A; Parker BL
Environ Sci Technol; 2017 Jul; 51(13):7502-7510. PubMed ID: 28613841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evidence of Absence: Bayesian Way to Reveal True Zeros Among Occupational Exposures.
Lavoue J; Burstyn I
Ann Work Expo Health; 2021 Jan; 65(1):84-95. PubMed ID: 32914163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Bivariate Left-Censored Measurements in Biomonitoring: A Bayesian Model for the Determination of Biological Limit Values Based on Occupational Exposure Limits.
Martin Remy A; Wild P
Ann Work Expo Health; 2017 Jun; 61(5):515-527. PubMed ID: 28475797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Application of mixed effects models for characterizing contaminated sites.
Shoari N; Dubé JS
Chemosphere; 2017 Jan; 166():380-388. PubMed ID: 27705825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.
Kelly F; Anderson HR; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Barratt B; Beevers S; Derwent D; Green D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Apr; (155):5-71. PubMed ID: 21830496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Empirical and parametric likelihood interval estimation for populations with many zero values: application for assessing environmental chemical concentrations and reproductive health.
Kang L; Vexler A; Tian L; Cooney M; Louis GM
Epidemiology; 2010 Jul; 21 Suppl 4():S58-63. PubMed ID: 21422967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Bayesian approach estimating treatment effects on biomarkers containing zeros with detection limits.
Chu H; Nie L; Kensler TW
Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(13):2497-508. PubMed ID: 18167630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Development and application of an aerosol screening model for size-resolved urban aerosols.
Stanier CO; Lee SR;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2014 Jun; (179):3-79. PubMed ID: 25145039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment and statistical modeling of the relationship between remotely sensed aerosol optical depth and PM2.5 in the eastern United States.
Paciorek CJ; Liu Y;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 May; (167):5-83; discussion 85-91. PubMed ID: 22838153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An investigation of the impact of left-censored soil contamination data on the uncertainty of descriptive statistical parameters.
Shoari N; Dubé JS
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2016 Oct; 35(10):2623-2631. PubMed ID: 26946089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluating heterogeneity in indoor and outdoor air pollution using land-use regression and constrained factor analysis.
Levy JI; Clougherty JE; Baxter LK; Houseman EA; Paciorek CJ;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2010 Dec; (152):5-80; discussion 81-91. PubMed ID: 21409949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Comparison of the β-Substitution Method and a Bayesian Method for Analyzing Left-Censored Data.
Huynh T; Quick H; Ramachandran G; Banerjee S; Stenzel M; Sandler DP; Engel LS; Kwok RK; Blair A; Stewart PA
Ann Occup Hyg; 2016 Jan; 60(1):56-73. PubMed ID: 26209598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data.
Hewett P; Ganser GH
Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Oct; 51(7):611-32. PubMed ID: 17940277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sample size and statistical power assessing the effect of interventions in the context of mixture distributions with detection limits.
Chu H; Nie L; Cole SR
Stat Med; 2006 Aug; 25(15):2647-57. PubMed ID: 16456897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Repeated measures with zeros.
Berk KN; Lachenbruch PA
Stat Methods Med Res; 2002 Aug; 11(4):303-16. PubMed ID: 12197298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Estimating the mean and standard deviation of environmental data with below detection limit observations: Considering highly skewed data and model misspecification.
Shoari N; Dubé JS; Chenouri S
Chemosphere; 2015 Nov; 138():599-608. PubMed ID: 26210025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Imputation of data values that are less than a detection limit.
Succop PA; Clark S; Chen M; Galke W
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2004 Jul; 1(7):436-41. PubMed ID: 15238313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing Space, Time, and Remediation Contribution to Soil Pollutant Variation near the Detection Limit Using Hurdle Models to Account for a Large Proportion of Nondetectable Results.
Huang L; Bradshaw K; Grosskleg J; Siciliano SD
Environ Sci Technol; 2019 Jun; 53(12):6824-6833. PubMed ID: 31070028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Change-point models to estimate the limit of detection.
May RC; Chu H; Ibrahim JG; Hudgens MG; Lees AC; Margolis DM
Stat Med; 2013 Dec; 32(28):4995-5007. PubMed ID: 23784922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An accurate substitution method for analyzing censored data.
Ganser GH; Hewett P
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Apr; 7(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 20169489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
