189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28614086)
1. The present and future of prostate cancer histopathology.
McKenney JK
Curr Opin Urol; 2017 Sep; 27(5):464-468. PubMed ID: 28614086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Histologic Grading of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma Can Be Further Optimized: Analysis of the Relative Prognostic Strength of Individual Architectural Patterns in 1275 Patients From the Canary Retrospective Cohort.
McKenney JK; Wei W; Hawley S; Auman H; Newcomb LF; Boyer HD; Fazli L; Simko J; Hurtado-Coll A; Troyer DA; Tretiakova MS; Vakar-Lopez F; Carroll PR; Cooperberg MR; Gleave ME; Lance RS; Lin DW; Nelson PS; Thompson IM; True LD; Feng Z; Brooks JD
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Nov; 40(11):1439-1456. PubMed ID: 27635949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Usual and unusual histologic patterns of high Gleason score 8 to 10 adenocarcinoma of the prostate in needle biopsy tissue.
Gottipati S; Warncke J; Vollmer R; Humphrey PA
Am J Surg Pathol; 2012 Jun; 36(6):900-7. PubMed ID: 22367295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prostate cancer grading in 2018: limitations, implementations, cribriform morphology, and biological markers.
Montironi R; Cimadamore A; Cheng L; Lopez-Beltran A; Scarpelli M
Int J Biol Markers; 2018 Nov; 33(4):331-334. PubMed ID: 29945478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. From Gleason to International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer.
Samaratunga H; Delahunt B; Yaxley J; Srigley JR; Egevad L
Scand J Urol; 2016 Oct; 50(5):325-9. PubMed ID: 27415753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate cancer with cribriform morphology: diagnosis, aggressiveness, molecular pathology and possible relationships with intraductal carcinoma.
Montironi R; Cimadamore A; Gasparrini S; Mazzucchelli R; Santoni M; Massari F; Cheng L; Lopez-Beltran A; Scarpelli M
Expert Rev Anticancer Ther; 2018 Jul; 18(7):685-693. PubMed ID: 29699428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Contemporary Gleason grading and novel Grade Groups in clinical practice.
Magi-Galluzzi C; Montironi R; Epstein JI
Curr Opin Urol; 2016 Sep; 26(5):488-92. PubMed ID: 27308734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving the Rotterdam European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator for Initial Prostate Biopsy by Incorporating the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason Grading and Cribriform growth.
Roobol MJ; Verbeek JFM; van der Kwast T; Kümmerlin IP; Kweldam CF; van Leenders GJLH
Eur Urol; 2017 Jul; 72(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 28162815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation between cribriform/intraductal prostatic adenocarcinoma and percent Gleason pattern 4 to a 22-gene genomic classifier.
Taylor AS; Morgan TM; Wallington DG; Chinnaiyan AM; Spratt DE; Mehra R
Prostate; 2020 Feb; 80(2):146-152. PubMed ID: 31737920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Gleason grading and prognostic factors in carcinoma of the prostate.
Humphrey PA
Mod Pathol; 2004 Mar; 17(3):292-306. PubMed ID: 14976540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Architectural heterogeneity and cribriform pattern predict adverse clinical outcome for Gleason grade 4 prostatic adenocarcinoma.
Dong F; Yang P; Wang C; Wu S; Xiao Y; McDougal WS; Young RH; Wu CL
Am J Surg Pathol; 2013 Dec; 37(12):1855-61. PubMed ID: 24145642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma: current state and prognostic implications.
Gordetsky J; Epstein J
Diagn Pathol; 2016 Mar; 11():25. PubMed ID: 26956509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High-grade foamy gland prostatic adenocarcinoma on biopsy or transurethral resection: a morphologic study of 55 cases.
Zhao J; Epstein JI
Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Apr; 33(4):583-90. PubMed ID: 19033862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Not all gleason pattern 4 prostate cancers are created equal: A study of latent prostatic carcinomas in a cystoprostatectomy and autopsy series.
Siadat F; Sykes J; Zlotta AR; Aldaoud N; Egawa S; Pushkar D; Kuk C; Bristow RG; Montironi R; van der Kwast T
Prostate; 2015 Sep; 75(12):1277-84. PubMed ID: 25963383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Going deeper through the Gleason scoring scale: An automatic end-to-end system for histology prostate grading and cribriform pattern detection.
Silva-Rodríguez J; Colomer A; Sales MA; Molina R; Naranjo V
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Oct; 195():105637. PubMed ID: 32653747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of Grading Gleason Score 7 Prostatic Adenocarcinoma on Needle Biopsy: Influence of Percent Pattern 4 and Other Histological Factors.
Meliti A; Sadimin E; Diolombi M; Khani F; Epstein JI
Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):681-685. PubMed ID: 28155999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Updates on Grading and Staging of Prostate Cancer.
Braunhut BL; Punnen S; Kryvenko ON
Surg Pathol Clin; 2018 Dec; 11(4):759-774. PubMed ID: 30447840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
