These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Shape deformation in two-dimensional electrical impedance tomography. Boyle A; Adler A; Lionheart WR IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Dec; 31(12):2185-93. PubMed ID: 22711769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional electrical impedance tomography: a topology optimization approach. Mello LA; de Lima CR; Amato MB; Lima RG; Silva EC IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Feb; 55(2 Pt 1):531-40. PubMed ID: 18269988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance electrical properties tomography for small anomalies using boundary conditions: A simulation study. Lee J; Choi N; Seo JK; Kim DH Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4773-4785. PubMed ID: 28508476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Electrical impedance tomography for piecewise constant domains using boundary element shape-based inverse solutions. Babaeizadeh S; Brooks DH IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 May; 26(5):637-47. PubMed ID: 17518058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of anisotropic modelling in electrical impedance tomography: description of method and preliminary assessment of utility in imaging brain function in the adult human head. Abascal JF; Arridge SR; Atkinson D; Horesh R; Fabrizi L; De Lucia M; Horesh L; Bayford RH; Holder DS Neuroimage; 2008 Nov; 43(2):258-68. PubMed ID: 18694835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The boundary element method in the forward and inverse problem of electrical impedance tomography. de Munck JC; Faes TJ; Heethaar RM IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Jun; 47(6):792-800. PubMed ID: 10833854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. An iterative Newton-Raphson method to solve the inverse admittivity problem. Edic PM; Isaacson D; Saulnier GJ; Jain H; Newell JC IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1998 Jul; 45(7):899-908. PubMed ID: 9644899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Imaging and estimation of human abdominal fat by electrical impedance tomography using multiple voltage measurement patterns. Yamaguchi TF; Katashima M; Wang LQ; Kuriki S Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():3299-302. PubMed ID: 24110433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Electrical impedance tomography problem with inaccurately known boundary and contact impedances. Kolehmainen V; Lassas M; Ola P IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Oct; 27(10):1404-14. PubMed ID: 18815092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Frequency-dependent anisotropic modeling and analysis using mfEIT: A computer simulation study. Zhang T; Li R; Potter T; Seo JK; Li G; Zhang Y Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2018 Jul; 34(7):e2980. PubMed ID: 29521020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of electrode area, contact impedance and boundary shape on EIT images. Boyle A; Adler A Physiol Meas; 2011 Jul; 32(7):745-54. PubMed ID: 21646710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimization of multi-angle Magneto-Acousto-Electrical Tomography (MAET) based on a numerical method. Sun T; Zeng X; Hao PH; Chin CT; Chen M; Yan JJ; Dai M; Lin HM; Chen S; Chen X Math Biosci Eng; 2020 Mar; 17(4):2864-2880. PubMed ID: 32987504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A deep neural network for estimating the bladder boundary using electrical impedance tomography. Konki SK; Khambampati AK; Sharma SK; Kim KY Physiol Meas; 2020 Dec; 41(11):115003. PubMed ID: 32726770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reconstruction of the shape of conductivity spectra using differential multi-frequency magnetic induction tomography. Brunner P; Merwa R; Missner A; Rosell J; Hollaus K; Scharfetter H Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S237-48. PubMed ID: 16636414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) for high-resolution conductivity imaging. Woo EJ; Seo JK Physiol Meas; 2008 Oct; 29(10):R1-26. PubMed ID: 18799834 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]