These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
436 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28617534)
1. AFC vs. AMH: prediction of ovarian response in women with endometrioma undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation. Ersahin AA; Arpaci H; Ersahin SS; Celik N; Acet M Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2017 May; 21(10):2499-2503. PubMed ID: 28617534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does the anti-Müllerian hormone truly reflect ovarian response in women with endometrioma? Inal ZO; Engin Ustun Y; Yilmaz N; Aktulay A; Bardakci Y; Gulerman C J Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 May; 39(4):516-521. PubMed ID: 30744464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predictive value of antral follicle count and serum anti-Müllerian hormone: Which is better for live birth prediction in patients aged over 40 with their first IVF treatment? Lee Y; Kim TH; Park JK; Eum JH; Lee HJ; Kim J; Lyu SW; Kim YS; Lee WS; Yoon TK Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Feb; 221():151-155. PubMed ID: 29306180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictive value of anti-müllerian hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone and antral follicle count on the outcome of ovarian stimulation in women following GnRH-antagonist protocol for IVF/ET. Tsakos E; Tolikas A; Daniilidis A; Asimakopoulos B Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Dec; 290(6):1249-53. PubMed ID: 25001569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anti-Müllerian hormone versus antral follicle count for defining the starting dose of FSH. Lan VT; Linh NK; Tuong HM; Wong PC; Howles CM Reprod Biomed Online; 2013 Oct; 27(4):390-9. PubMed ID: 23953069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcomes of anti-Müllerian hormone-tailored ovarian stimulation protocols in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles in women of advanced age. Liao CC; Lee RK; Lin SY; Lin MH; Hwu YM Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 55(2):239-43. PubMed ID: 27125408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The addition of anti-Müllerian hormone in an algorithm for individualized hormone dosage did not improve the prediction of ovarian response-a randomized, controlled trial. Magnusson Å; Nilsson L; Oleröd G; Thurin-Kjellberg A; Bergh C Hum Reprod; 2017 Apr; 32(4):811-819. PubMed ID: 28175316 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The use of anti-Müllerian hormone and antral follicle count to predict the potential of oocytes and embryos. Majumder K; Gelbaya TA; Laing I; Nardo LG Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 Jun; 150(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 20223579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of antral follicle count and serum anti Müllerian hormone level for determination of gonadotropin dosing in in-vitro fertilization: randomized trial. Li HWR; Ko JKY; Lee VCY; Yung SSF; Lau EYL; Yeung WSB; Ho PC; Ng EHY Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 55(3):303-309. PubMed ID: 31325336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ovarian Endometrioma Negatively Impacts Oocyte Quality and Quantity But Not Pregnancy Outcomes in Women Undergoing IVF/ICSI Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Wu Y; Yang R; Lan J; Lin H; Jiao X; Zhang Q Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2021; 12():739228. PubMed ID: 34880831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictive values of anti-müllerian hormone, antral follicle count and ovarian response prediction index (ORPI) for assisted reproductive technology outcomes. Ashrafi M; Hemat M; Arabipoor A; Salman Yazdi R; Bahman-Abadi A; Cheraghi R J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Jan; 37(1):82-88. PubMed ID: 27976974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Circulating basal anti-Müllerian hormone levels as predictor of ovarian response in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. Nardo LG; Gelbaya TA; Wilkinson H; Roberts SA; Yates A; Pemberton P; Laing I Fertil Steril; 2009 Nov; 92(5):1586-93. PubMed ID: 18930213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Efficacy of three COS protocols and predictability of AMH and AFC in women with discordant ovarian reserve markers: a retrospective study on 19,239 patients. Guo Y; Jiang H; Hu S; Liu S; Li F; Jin L J Ovarian Res; 2021 Aug; 14(1):111. PubMed ID: 34454544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ovarian response and cumulative live birth rate of women undergoing in-vitro fertilisation who had discordant anti-Mullerian hormone and antral follicle count measurements: a retrospective study. Li HW; Lee VC; Lau EY; Yeung WS; Ho PC; Ng EH PLoS One; 2014; 9(10):e108493. PubMed ID: 25313856 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Antral follicle count determines poor ovarian response better than anti-Müllerian hormone but age is the only predictor for live birth in in vitro fertilization cycles. Mutlu MF; Erdem M; Erdem A; Yildiz S; Mutlu I; Arisoy O; Oktem M J Assist Reprod Genet; 2013 Jun; 30(5):657-65. PubMed ID: 23508679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. AMH has no role in predicting oocyte quality in women with advanced age undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles. Dai X; Wang Y; Yang H; Gao T; Yu C; Cao F; Xia X; Wu J; Zhou X; Chen L Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):19750. PubMed ID: 33184364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of antimüllerian hormone levels and antral follicle count as predictor of ovarian response to controlled ovarian stimulation in good-prognosis patients at individual fertility clinics in two multicenter trials. Nelson SM; Klein BM; Arce JC Fertil Steril; 2015 Apr; 103(4):923-930.e1. PubMed ID: 25624196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of baseline antral follicle count and anti-Mullerian hormone in the index stimulation cycle of IVF treatment in predicting outcome of subsequent frozen-thawed embryo transfers. Li HW; Lee VC; Lau EY; Yeung WS; Ho PC; Ng EH Gynecol Endocrinol; 2014 Jul; 30(7):490-3. PubMed ID: 24641676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of ovarian reserve by antral follicle count in ovaries with endometrioma. Lima ML; Martins WP; Coelho Neto MA; Nastri CO; Ferriani RA; Navarro PA Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Aug; 46(2):239-42. PubMed ID: 25504940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]