These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28618034)

  • 1. Computer-Mediated Communication in Intimate Relationships: Associations of Boundary Crossing, Intrusion, Relationship Satisfaction, and Partner Responsiveness.
    Norton AM; Baptist J; Hogan B
    J Marital Fam Ther; 2018 Jan; 44(1):165-182. PubMed ID: 28618034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Brief Accessibility, Responsiveness, and Engagement Scale: A Tool for Measuring Attachment Behaviors in Clinical Couples.
    Sandberg JG; Novak JR; Davis SY; Busby DM
    J Marital Fam Ther; 2016 Jan; 42(1):106-22. PubMed ID: 26748730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceived partner responsiveness predicts smoking cessation in single-smoker couples.
    Britton M; Haddad S; Derrick JL
    Addict Behav; 2019 Jan; 88():122-128. PubMed ID: 30176500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Couple similarity and marital satisfaction: are similar spouses happier?
    Gaunt R
    J Pers; 2006 Oct; 74(5):1401-20. PubMed ID: 16958707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Role of Sexual Communication in Couples' Sexual Outcomes: A Dyadic Path Analysis.
    Jones AC; Robinson WD; Seedall RB
    J Marital Fam Ther; 2018 Oct; 44(4):606-623. PubMed ID: 29044661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Romantic Relationship Quality in the Digital Age: A Study with Young Adults.
    Sánchez V; Muñoz-Fernández N; Ortega-Ruiz R
    Span J Psychol; 2017 May; 20():E24. PubMed ID: 28464978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing Relationship and Sexual Satisfaction in Adolescent Relationships Formed Online and Offline.
    Blunt-Vinti HD; Wheldon C; McFarlane M; Brogan N; Walsh-Buhi ER
    J Adolesc Health; 2016 Jan; 58(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 26707225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Partner traits that predict relationship satisfaction for neurotic individuals in premarital relationships.
    Larson JH; Blick RW; Jackson JB; Holman TB
    J Sex Marital Ther; 2010; 36(5):430-44. PubMed ID: 20924938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Couple communication, emotional and sexual intimacy, and relationship satisfaction.
    Yoo H; Bartle-Haring S; Day RD; Gangamma R
    J Sex Marital Ther; 2014; 40(4):275-93. PubMed ID: 24111536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Associations among attachment, sexuality, and marital satisfaction in adult Chilean couples: a linear hierarchical models analysis.
    Heresi Milad E; Rivera Ottenberger D; Huepe Artigas D
    J Sex Marital Ther; 2014; 40(4):259-74. PubMed ID: 24128036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Exploring relationships among communication, sexual satisfaction, and marital satisfaction.
    Litzinger S; Gordon KC
    J Sex Marital Ther; 2005; 31(5):409-24. PubMed ID: 16169824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Intimacy Behaviors and Relationship Satisfaction for Cohabitors: Intimate Sacrifices Are Not Always Beneficial.
    Young VJ; Curran MA
    J Psychol; 2016 Aug; 150(6):779-92. PubMed ID: 27269507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Personality pathology and relationship satisfaction in dating and married couples.
    Decuyper M; Gistelinck F; Vergauwe J; Pancorbo G; De Fruyt F
    Personal Disord; 2018 Jan; 9(1):81-92. PubMed ID: 27775412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Profiles of Low-Income Help-Seeking Couples and Implications for Intervention Gains: A Couple-Centered Approach.
    Le Y; Xia M; Roddy MK; Hatch SG; Doss BD
    Behav Ther; 2024 May; 55(3):443-456. PubMed ID: 38670660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fostering connection: A dyadic analysis of the relationships between mattering, attachment, and mental health.
    Ybarra JA; Seedall RB
    J Marital Fam Ther; 2024 Jul; 50(3):649-668. PubMed ID: 38769636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Similarity of relationship standards, couple communication patterns, and marital satisfaction among Chinese couples.
    Chi P; Epstein NB; Fang X; Lam DO; Li X
    J Fam Psychol; 2013 Oct; 27(5):806-16. PubMed ID: 24015705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The interpersonal process model of intimacy in marriage: a daily-diary and multilevel modeling approach.
    Laurenceau JP; Barrett LF; Rovine MJ
    J Fam Psychol; 2005 Jun; 19(2):314-23. PubMed ID: 15982109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Partner dissimilarity in life satisfaction: Stability and change, correlates, and outcomes.
    Schade HM; Hülür G; Infurna FJ; Hoppmann CA; Gerstorf D
    Psychol Aging; 2016 Jun; 31(4):327-39. PubMed ID: 27294715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trauma Symptoms, Communication, and Relationship Satisfaction in Military Couples.
    Bakhurst M; McGuire A; Halford WK
    Fam Process; 2018 Mar; 57(1):241-252. PubMed ID: 28271505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using Difference Scores to Inform Therapy Practice: Differences in Perceptions of Attachment Behaviors between Partners in a Clinical Sample.
    Novak JR; Sandberg JG; Busby DM
    J Marital Fam Ther; 2018 Oct; 44(4):624-639. PubMed ID: 29338091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.