149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28618754)
1. Evaluation and comparison of radiologic-pathologic findings in invasive cribriform carcinoma of the breast.
Balci P; Başara Akin I; Köremezli N; Güray Durak M; Altay C; Gezer NS; Sevinç Aİ
Turk J Med Sci; 2017 Jun; 47(3):738-747. PubMed ID: 28618754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Invasive cribriform carcinoma of the breast: mammographic, sonographic, MRI, and 18 F-FDG PET-CT features.
Lee YJ; Choi BB; Suh KS
Acta Radiol; 2015 Jun; 56(6):644-51. PubMed ID: 24938660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinicopathological analysis of invasive cribriform carcinoma of the breast, with review of the literature.
Demir S; Sezgin G; Sari AA; Kucukzeybek BB; Yigit S; Etit D; Yazici A; Kucukzeybek Y
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2021 Oct; 54():151794. PubMed ID: 34325338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Nonpalpable BI-RADS 4 breast lesions: sonographic findings and pathology correlation.
Elverici E; Barça AN; Aktaş H; Özsoy A; Zengin B; Çavuşoğlu M; Araz L
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2015; 21(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 25835079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Basal-like Breast Cancer: Comparison of Imaging Characteristics.
Choi BB; Jang HJ; Choi SI
Curr Med Imaging; 2020; 16(3):241-248. PubMed ID: 32133954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Qualitative Radiogenomics: Association between Oncotype DX Test Recurrence Score and BI-RADS Mammographic and Breast MR Imaging Features.
Woodard GA; Ray KM; Joe BN; Price ER
Radiology; 2018 Jan; 286(1):60-70. PubMed ID: 28885890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Metaplastic carcinoma of the breast: multimodality imaging and histopathologic assessment.
Choi BB; Shu KS
Acta Radiol; 2012 Feb; 53(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 22090465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Imaging findings of primary breast sarcoma: Results of a first multicenter study.
Wienbeck S; Meyer HJ; Herzog A; Nemat S; Teifke A; Heindel W; Schäfer F; Kinner S; Müller-Schimpfle M; Surov A
Eur J Radiol; 2017 Mar; 88():1-7. PubMed ID: 28189193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: comparison of diagnostic accuracy of digital breast tomosynthesis, digital mammography, and ultrasonography.
Su X; Lin Q; Cui C; Xu W; Wei Z; Fei J; Li L
Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):562-570. PubMed ID: 27837442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of retraction phenomenon and BI-RADS-US descriptors in differentiating benign and malignant breast masses using an automated breast volume scanner.
Zheng FY; Yan LX; Huang BJ; Xia HS; Wang X; Lu Q; Li CX; Wang WP
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Nov; 84(11):2123-9. PubMed ID: 26272029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast lesion shape and margin evaluation: BI-RADS based metrics understate radiologists' actual levels of agreement.
Rawashdeh M; Lewis S; Zaitoun M; Brennan P
Comput Biol Med; 2018 May; 96():294-298. PubMed ID: 29673997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mammographic, sonographic and MR imaging features of invasive micropapillary breast cancer.
Alsharif S; Daghistani R; Kamberoğlu EA; Omeroglu A; Meterissian S; Mesurolle B
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1375-80. PubMed ID: 24913934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlations Between Ultrasonographic Findings of Invasive Lobular Carcinoma of the Breast and Intrinsic Subtypes.
Wen X; Yu Y; Yu X; Cheng W; Wang Z; Liu L; Zhang L; Qin L; Tian J
Ultraschall Med; 2019 Dec; 40(6):764-770. PubMed ID: 30253431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. BI-RADS Ultrasound Lexicon Descriptors and Stromal Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
Candelaria RP; Spak DA; Rauch GM; Huo L; Bassett RL; Santiago L; Scoggins ME; Guirguis MS; Patel MM; Whitman GJ; Moulder SL; Thompson AM; Ravenberg EE; White JB; Abuhadra NK; Valero V; Litton J; Adrada BE; Yang WT
Acad Radiol; 2022 Jan; 29 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S35-S41. PubMed ID: 34272161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The breast imaging reporting and data system: positive predictive value of mammographic features and final assessment categories.
Liberman L; Abramson AF; Squires FB; Glassman JR; Morris EA; Dershaw DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jul; 171(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9648759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Imaging features of benign adenomyoepithelioma of the breast.
Park YM; Park JS; Jung HS; Yoon HK; Yang WT
J Clin Ultrasound; 2013 May; 41(4):218-23. PubMed ID: 23325754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammographic and sonographic features of triple-negative invasive carcinoma of no special type.
Jung HK; Han K; Lee YJ; Moon HJ; Kim EK; Kim MJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Feb; 41(2):375-83. PubMed ID: 25542493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The radiological appearances of invasive cribriform carcinoma of the breast. Nottingham Breast Team.
Stutz JA; Evans AJ; Pinder S; Ellis IO; Yeoman LJ; Wilson AR; Sibbering DM
Clin Radiol; 1994 Oct; 49(10):693-5. PubMed ID: 7955831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: detection in dependence of the BI-RADS categories.
Obenauer S; Sohns C; Werner C; Grabbe E
Breast J; 2006; 12(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 16409582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiologic findings of lobular carcinoma in situ: mammography and ultrasonography.
Choi BB; Kim SH; Park CS; Cha ES; Lee AW
J Clin Ultrasound; 2011 Feb; 39(2):59-63. PubMed ID: 21213330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
