These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28620936)

  • 1. Measuring pregnancy planning: A psychometric evaluation and comparison of two scales.
    Drevin J; Kristiansson P; Stern J; Rosenblad A
    J Adv Nurs; 2017 Nov; 73(11):2765-2775. PubMed ID: 28620936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Validation of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy among pregnant Australian women.
    Lang AY; Hall JA; Boyle JA; Harrison CL; Teede H; Moran LJ; Barrett G
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220774. PubMed ID: 31393966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy in Brazilian Portuguese.
    Borges AL; Barrett G; Dos Santos OA; Nascimento Nde C; Cavalhieri FB; Fujimori E
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2016 Aug; 16(1):244. PubMed ID: 27557860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Turkish validity and reliability study of the London measure of unplanned pregnancy.
    Altiparmak S; Yilmaz AN; Aksoy Derya Y
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 Apr; 47(4):1362-1370. PubMed ID: 33496061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the Hindi version of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy among pregnant and postnatal women in urban India.
    Das S; Hall J; Barrett G; Osrin D; Kapadia S; Jayaraman A
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2021 Sep; 21(1):602. PubMed ID: 34481471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Understanding pregnancy planning in a low-income country setting: validation of the London measure of unplanned pregnancy in Malawi.
    Hall J; Barrett G; Mbwana N; Copas A; Malata A; Stephenson J
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2013 Nov; 13():200. PubMed ID: 24188251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the Krio Language Version of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy in Western Area, Sierra Leone.
    Brima N; Samba TT; Yamba A; Barrett G; Stephenson J; Hall J
    Afr J Reprod Health; 2019 Dec; 23(4):81-91. PubMed ID: 32227743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. DEVELOPMENT AND PSYCHOMETRIC TESTING OF AN INSTRUMENT TO MEASURE WOMEN'S PERCEPTIONS OF UNPLANNED PREGNANCY.
    Mohammadi E; Nourizadeh R; Simbar M; Baghestani AR; Rohana N
    J Biosoc Sci; 2019 May; 51(3):394-402. PubMed ID: 30274563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Proportion of unplanned pregnancies, their determinants and health outcomes of women delivering at a teaching hospital in Sri Lanka.
    Ranatunga IDJC; Jayaratne K
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Nov; 20(1):667. PubMed ID: 33153469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of a pregnancy planning measure for Arabic-speaking women.
    Almaghaslah E; Rochat R; Farhat G
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185433. PubMed ID: 29059191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy in a United States population of women.
    Morof D; Steinauer J; Haider S; Liu S; Darney P; Barrett G
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e35381. PubMed ID: 22536377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the Chichewa version of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy in Malawi: a validation update.
    Hall JA; Stephenson J; Barrett G
    BMC Res Notes; 2021 Jun; 14(1):231. PubMed ID: 34112219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the Amharic version of the London measure of unplanned pregnancy in Ethiopia.
    Olani AB; Bekelcho T; Woldemeskel A; Tefera K; Eyob D
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(6):e0269781. PubMed ID: 35696385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychometric Evaluation of an Instrument to Measure Prospective Pregnancy Preferences: The Desire to Avoid Pregnancy Scale.
    Rocca CH; Ralph LJ; Wilson M; Gould H; Foster DG
    Med Care; 2019 Feb; 57(2):152-158. PubMed ID: 30550399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Psychometric properties and refinement of the Reproductive Coercion Scale.
    McCauley HL; Silverman JG; Jones KA; Tancredi DJ; Decker MR; McCormick MC; Austin SB; Anderson HA; Miller E
    Contraception; 2017 Mar; 95(3):292-298. PubMed ID: 27639927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychometric properties of the Dutch version of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy in women with pregnancies ending in birth.
    Goossens J; Verhaeghe S; Van Hecke A; Barrett G; Delbaere I; Beeckman D
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0194033. PubMed ID: 29668712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Conceptualisation, development, and evaluation of a measure of unplanned pregnancy.
    Barrett G; Smith SC; Wellings K
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2004 May; 58(5):426-33. PubMed ID: 15082745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pregnancy Planning among Female Sex Workers in Uganda: Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy.
    Bukenya JN; Nalwadda CK; Neema S; Kyambadde P; Wanyenze RK; Barrett G
    Afr J Reprod Health; 2019 Sep; 23(3):79-95. PubMed ID: 31782634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unplanned pregnancy and the association with maternal health and pregnancy outcomes: A Swedish cohort study.
    Carlander A; Hultstrand JN; Reuterwall I; Jonsson M; Tydén T; Kullinger M
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(5):e0286052. PubMed ID: 37216351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measuring unintended pregnancies in postpartum Iranian women: validation of the London Measure of Unplanned Pregnancy.
    Roshanaei S; Shaghaghi A; Jafarabadi MA; Kousha A
    East Mediterr Health J; 2015 Sep; 21(8):572-8. PubMed ID: 26446528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.