These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28620945)

  • 1. Measuring the statistical validity of summary meta-analysis and meta-regression results for use in clinical practice.
    Willis BH; Riley RD
    Stat Med; 2017 Sep; 36(21):3283-3301. PubMed ID: 28620945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing meta-regression methods for examining moderator relationships with dependent effect sizes: A Monte Carlo simulation.
    López-López JA; Van den Noortgate W; Tanner-Smith EE; Wilson SJ; Lipsey MW
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Dec; 8(4):435-450. PubMed ID: 28556477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of publication bias on the Q test and assessment of heterogeneity.
    Augusteijn HEM; van Aert RCM; van Assen MALM
    Psychol Methods; 2019 Feb; 24(1):116-134. PubMed ID: 30489099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tailored meta-analysis: an investigation of the correlation between the test positive rate and prevalence.
    Willis BH; Coomar D; Baragilly M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Feb; 106():1-9. PubMed ID: 30278213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Testing for homogeneity in meta-analysis I. The one-parameter case: standardized mean difference.
    Kulinskaya E; Dollinger MB; Bjørkestøl K
    Biometrics; 2011 Mar; 67(1):203-12. PubMed ID: 20528863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of one-stage vs two-stage individual patient data meta-analysis methods: A simulation study.
    Kontopantelis E
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):417-430. PubMed ID: 29786975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysis.
    Veroniki AA; Jackson D; Viechtbauer W; Bender R; Bowden J; Knapp G; Kuss O; Higgins JP; Langan D; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Mar; 7(1):55-79. PubMed ID: 26332144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of analysing continuous outcomes using final values, change scores and analysis of covariance on the performance of meta-analytic methods: a simulation study.
    McKenzie JE; Herbison GP; Deeks JJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Dec; 7(4):371-386. PubMed ID: 26715122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
    Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of meta-methods for synthesizing indirect effects.
    van Zundert CHJ; Miočević M
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):849-865. PubMed ID: 32833348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Heterogeneity and statistical significance in meta-analysis: an empirical study of 125 meta-analyses.
    Engels EA; Schmid CH; Terrin N; Olkin I; Lau J
    Stat Med; 2000 Jul; 19(13):1707-28. PubMed ID: 10861773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Meta-analysis of studies with missing data.
    Yuan Y; Little RJ
    Biometrics; 2009 Jun; 65(2):487-96. PubMed ID: 18565168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of multiple endpoint dependency on Q and I(2) in meta-analysis.
    Thompson CG; Becker BJ
    Res Synth Methods; 2014 Sep; 5(3):235-53. PubMed ID: 26052849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of old and new tests of heterogeneity in epidemiologic meta-analysis.
    Takkouche B; Cadarso-Suárez C; Spiegelman D
    Am J Epidemiol; 1999 Jul; 150(2):206-15. PubMed ID: 10412966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Statistical approaches to identify subgroups in meta-analysis of individual participant data: a simulation study.
    Belias M; Rovers MM; Reitsma JB; Debray TPA; IntHout J
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Sep; 19(1):183. PubMed ID: 31477023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Basic concepts in meta-analysis: A primer for clinicians.
    Khoshdel A; Attia J; Carney SL
    Int J Clin Pract; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1287-94. PubMed ID: 16981972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative performance of heterogeneity variance estimators in meta-analysis: a review of simulation studies.
    Langan D; Higgins JPT; Simmonds M
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Jun; 8(2):181-198. PubMed ID: 27060925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parameter accuracy in meta-analyses of factor structures.
    Gnambs T; Staufenbiel T
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Jun; 7(2):168-86. PubMed ID: 27286902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Empirical evidence about inconsistency among studies in a pair-wise meta-analysis.
    Rhodes KM; Turner RM; Higgins JP
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Dec; 7(4):346-370. PubMed ID: 26679486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beta-binomial model for meta-analysis of odds ratios.
    Bakbergenuly I; Kulinskaya E
    Stat Med; 2017 May; 36(11):1715-1734. PubMed ID: 28124446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.