These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28620945)

  • 21. Multivariate meta-analysis: a robust approach based on the theory of U-statistic.
    Ma Y; Mazumdar M
    Stat Med; 2011 Oct; 30(24):2911-29. PubMed ID: 21830230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Meta-analysis of incidence rate data in the presence of zero events.
    Spittal MJ; Pirkis J; Gurrin LC
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Apr; 15():42. PubMed ID: 25925169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Using multiple group modeling to test moderators in meta-analysis.
    Schoemann AM
    Res Synth Methods; 2016 Dec; 7(4):387-401. PubMed ID: 27936303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Coordinate based random effect size meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies.
    Tench CR; Tanasescu R; Constantinescu CS; Auer DP; Cottam WJ
    Neuroimage; 2017 Jun; 153():293-306. PubMed ID: 28389386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accounting for heterogeneity in meta-analysis using a multiplicative model-an empirical study.
    Mawdsley D; Higgins JP; Sutton AJ; Abrams KR
    Res Synth Methods; 2017 Mar; 8(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 27259973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Methods to calculate uncertainty in the estimated overall effect size from a random-effects meta-analysis.
    Veroniki AA; Jackson D; Bender R; Kuss O; Langan D; Higgins JPT; Knapp G; Salanti G
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):23-43. PubMed ID: 30129707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A framework for the meta-analysis of Bland-Altman studies based on a limits of agreement approach.
    Tipton E; Shuster J
    Stat Med; 2017 Oct; 36(23):3621-3635. PubMed ID: 28664537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessing the suitability of summary data for two-sample Mendelian randomization analyses using MR-Egger regression: the role of the I2 statistic.
    Bowden J; Del Greco M F; Minelli C; Davey Smith G; Sheehan NA; Thompson JR
    Int J Epidemiol; 2016 Dec; 45(6):1961-1974. PubMed ID: 27616674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I2 index?
    Huedo-Medina TB; Sánchez-Meca J; Marín-Martínez F; Botella J
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Jun; 11(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 16784338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature.
    Sterne JA; Gavaghan D; Egger M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 Nov; 53(11):1119-29. PubMed ID: 11106885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quantifying the impact of between-study heterogeneity in multivariate meta-analyses.
    Jackson D; White IR; Riley RD
    Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(29):3805-20. PubMed ID: 22763950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A method of moments estimator for random effect multivariate meta-analysis.
    Chen H; Manning AK; Dupuis J
    Biometrics; 2012 Dec; 68(4):1278-84. PubMed ID: 22551393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Statistical methodology for estimating the mean difference in a meta-analysis without study-specific variance information.
    Sangnawakij P; Böhning D; Adams S; Stanton M; Holling H
    Stat Med; 2017 Apr; 36(9):1395-1413. PubMed ID: 28168731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Computationally efficient methods for fitting mixed models to electronic health records data.
    Rhodes KM; Turner RM; Payne RA; White IR
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(29):4557-4570. PubMed ID: 30155902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Meta-analysis of the Italian studies on short-term effects of air pollution].
    Biggeri A; Bellini P; Terracini B;
    Epidemiol Prev; 2001; 25(2 Suppl):1-71. PubMed ID: 11515188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Testing for funnel plot asymmetry of standardized mean differences.
    Pustejovsky JE; Rodgers MA
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 30506832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The median and the mode as robust meta-analysis estimators in the presence of small-study effects and outliers.
    Hartwig FP; Davey Smith G; Schmidt AF; Sterne JAC; Higgins JPT; Bowden J
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):397-412. PubMed ID: 32092231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An improved method for bivariate meta-analysis when within-study correlations are unknown.
    Hong C; D Riley R; Chen Y
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 29055096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Detecting small-study effects and funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analysis of survival data: A comparison of new and existing tests.
    Debray TPA; Moons KGM; Riley RD
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 28975717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A simplification and implementation of random-effects meta-analyses based on the exact distribution of Cochran's Q.
    Preuß M; Ziegler A
    Methods Inf Med; 2014; 53(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 24317521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.