These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28620992)

  • 41. A statistical measure for the skewness of X chromosome inactivation for quantitative traits and its application to the MCTFR data.
    Li BH; Yu WY; Zhou JY
    BMC Genom Data; 2021 Jul; 22(1):24. PubMed ID: 34215184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Power comparison of regression methods to test quantitative traits for association and linkage.
    Zhu X; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2000 Apr; 18(4):322-30. PubMed ID: 10797592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Statistical dissection of cyto-nuclear epistasis subject to genomic imprinting in line crosses.
    He T; Sa J; Zhong PS; Cui Y
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e91702. PubMed ID: 24643065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Estimation of Additive, Dominance, and Imprinting Genetic Variance Using Genomic Data.
    Lopes MS; Bastiaansen JW; Janss L; Knol EF; Bovenhuis H
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 Oct; 5(12):2629-37. PubMed ID: 26438289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A method for using incomplete triads to test maternally mediated genetic effects and parent-of-origin effects in relation to a quantitative trait.
    Kistner EO; Infante-Rivard C; Weinberg CR
    Am J Epidemiol; 2006 Feb; 163(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 16339052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Analysis of genomic imprinting by quantitative allele-specific expression by Pyrosequencing(®).
    McKeown PC; Fort A; Spillane C
    Methods Mol Biol; 2014; 1112():85-104. PubMed ID: 24478009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Removing phenotypic distribution assumptions from tests of linkage disequilibrium for quantitative traits.
    Alcaïs A; Abel L
    Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Apr; 24(3):191-9. PubMed ID: 12652523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Model for mapping imprinted quantitative trait loci in an inbred F2 design.
    Cui Y; Lu Q; Cheverud JM; Littell RC; Wu R
    Genomics; 2006 Apr; 87(4):543-51. PubMed ID: 16413163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An open-pollinated design for mapping imprinting genes in natural populations.
    Sun L; Zhu X; Bo W; Xu F; Cheng T; Zhang Q; Wu R
    Brief Bioinform; 2015 May; 16(3):449-60. PubMed ID: 24927940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Genomic imprinting and Turner syndrome.
    Bondy CA; Hougen HY; Zhou J; Cheng CM
    Pediatr Endocrinol Rev; 2012 May; 9 Suppl 2():728-32. PubMed ID: 22946286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Parent-of-origin specific QTL--a possibility towards understanding reciprocal effects in chicken and the origin of imprinting.
    Tuiskula-Haavisto M; Vilkki J
    Cytogenet Genome Res; 2007; 117(1-4):305-12. PubMed ID: 17675872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. X-inactivation informs variance-based testing for X-linked association of a quantitative trait.
    Ma L; Hoffman G; Keinan A
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Mar; 16(1):241. PubMed ID: 25880738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A simple method for detection of imprinting effects based on case-parents trios.
    Zhou JY; Hu YQ; Fung WK
    Heredity (Edinb); 2007 Feb; 98(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 17035952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. A robust and powerful test for case-control genetic association study on X chromosome.
    Wang P; Xu SQ; Wang BQ; Fung WK; Zhou JY
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2019; 28(10-11):3260-3272. PubMed ID: 30232923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Parametric approach to genomic imprinting analysis with applications to Angelman's syndrome.
    Shete S; Zhou X
    Hum Hered; 2005; 59(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 15802919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Model-based linkage analysis with imprinting for quantitative traits: ignoring imprinting effects can severely jeopardize detection of linkage.
    Sung YJ; Rao DC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2008 Jul; 32(5):487-96. PubMed ID: 18366130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Review of statistical methodologies for the detection of parent-of-origin effects in family trio genome-wide association data with binary disease traits.
    Connolly S; Heron EA
    Brief Bioinform; 2015 May; 16(3):429-48. PubMed ID: 24903222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Detecting rare variants for quantitative traits using nuclear families.
    Guo W; Shugart YY
    Hum Hered; 2012; 73(3):148-58. PubMed ID: 22699804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A model for family-based case-control studies of genetic imprinting and epistasis.
    Li X; Sui Y; Liu T; Wang J; Li Y; Lin Z; Hegarty J; Koltun WA; Wang Z; Wu R
    Brief Bioinform; 2014 Nov; 15(6):1069-79. PubMed ID: 23887693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Quantifying genomic imprinting in the presence of linkage.
    Vincent Q; Alcaïs A; Alter A; Schurr E; Abel L
    Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1071-80. PubMed ID: 17156281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.