These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28621270)

  • 1. Influence of Hand Instrumentation and Ultrasonic Scaling on the Microleakage of various Cervical Restorations: An in vitro Study.
    Rohani B; Barekatain M; Farhad SZ; Haghayegh N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Jun; 18(6):437-442. PubMed ID: 28621270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of postoperative bleaching on marginal leakage of resin composite and resin-modified glass ionomer restorations at different delayed periods of exposure to carbamide peroxide.
    Moosavi H; Ghavamnasiri M; Manari V
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2009 Nov; 10(6):E009-16. PubMed ID: 20020076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative evaluation of different periods of enamel microabrasion on the microleakage of class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations: An
    Bansal D; Mahajan M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2017; 28(6):675-680. PubMed ID: 29256469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of ultrasonic instrumentation on microleakage in composite restorations with glass ionomer liners.
    Arcoria CJ; Gonzalez JP; Vitasek BA; Wagner MJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 1992 Jan; 19(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 1533870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microleakage of Class V resin-modified glass ionomer and compomer restorations.
    Toledano M; Osorio E; Osorio R; García-Godoy F
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 May; 81(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10220667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of a carbomer/fluoroapatite-enhanced glass-ionomer cement on primary teeth restorations.
    Tolidis K; Boutsiouki C; Gerasimou P
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2016 Sep; 17(3):227-233. PubMed ID: 27759413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of various surface protections on the margin microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Chuang SF; Jin YT; Tsai PF; Wong TY
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):309-14. PubMed ID: 11552169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage on Class V glass ionomer restorations after cavity preparation with aluminum oxide air abrasion.
    Corona SA; Borsatto MC; Rocha RA; Palma-Dibb RG
    Braz Dent J; 2005; 16(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 16113931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems.
    Kasraei S; Azarsina M; Majidi S
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of dental adhesive systems with amalgam and resin composite restorations: comparison of microleakage and bond strength results.
    Neme AL; Evans DB; Maxson BB
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(6):512-9. PubMed ID: 11203864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microleakage of compomer restorations in primary teeth after preparation with bur or air abrasion.
    Aysegül O; Nurhan O; Haluk B; Dilek T
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 15853100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Four Different Materials in the Repair of Amalgam Restorations: An
    Chavan A; Darak P; Vallabhaneni S; Peerzade SM; Shenvi S; Patil TN
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Jul; 21(7):741-747. PubMed ID: 33020356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Microleakage in conventional and bonded amalgam restorations: influence of cavity volume.
    da Silva AF; Piva E; Demarco FF; Correr Sobrinho L; Osinga PW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(3):377-83. PubMed ID: 16802647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of finishing technique on the microleakage and surface texture of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials.
    Wilder AD; Swift EJ; May KN; Thompson JY; McDougal RA
    J Dent; 2000 Jul; 28(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 10785304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessment of Microleakage Using Dye Penetration Method in Primary Teeth Restored with Tooth-colored Materials: An
    Punathil S; Almalki SA; AlJameel AH; Gowdar IM; Mc VA; Chinnari K
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2019 Jul; 20(7):778-782. PubMed ID: 31597795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of ZOE temporary restorations on microleakage in composite restorations.
    Yap AU; Shah KC; Loh ET; Sim SS; Tan CC
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(2):142-6. PubMed ID: 11933904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage of bonded amalgam restorations using different adhesive agents with dye under vacuum: an in vitro study.
    Parolia A; Kundabala M; Gupta V; Verma M; Batra C; Shenoy R; Srikant N
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):252-5. PubMed ID: 21891895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of dentin adhesives and liner materials on the microleakage of class II resin composite restorations in primary and permanent teeth.
    Güngör HC; Canoğlu E; Cehreli ZC
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2014; 38(3):223-8. PubMed ID: 25095316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Microleakage in different primary tooth restorations.
    Shih WY
    J Chin Med Assoc; 2016 Apr; 79(4):228-34. PubMed ID: 26839288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.