136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28621553)
1. Attitudes toward comparative effectiveness research and patient engagement among reproductive health clinicians.
Kohn J; Unger Z; Dolatshahi J; Simons H; Rein A
J Comp Eff Res; 2017 Jun; 6(4):337-345. PubMed ID: 28621553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Increasing uptake of comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research among stakeholders: insights from conference discussion.
Law E; Harrington R; Alexander GC; Saha S; Oehrlein E; Perfetto EM
J Comp Eff Res; 2018 Feb; 7(2):181-191. PubMed ID: 29465252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Public perceptions of comparative effectiveness research and use of evidence in healthcare decision-making.
Cornwell D; Hu M; Esposito D
J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Nov; 3(6):623-34. PubMed ID: 25494569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research: enhancing uptake and use by patients, clinicians and payers.
Schumock GT; Pickard AS
J Comp Eff Res; 2018 Feb; 7(2):177-180. PubMed ID: 29464965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Health researcher views on comparative effectiveness research and research engagement.
Forsythe LP; Frank LB; Workman TA; Borsky A; Hilliard T; Harwell D; Fayish L
J Comp Eff Res; 2017 May; 6(3):245-256. PubMed ID: 28173710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient and clinician views on comparative effectiveness research and engagement in research.
Forsythe LP; Frank L; Walker KO; Anise A; Wegener N; Weisman H; Hunt G; Beal A
J Comp Eff Res; 2015 Jan; 4(1):11-25. PubMed ID: 25565066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The case for a comparative, value-based alternative to the patient-centered outcomes research model for comparative effectiveness research.
Marko NF; Weil RJ
Neurosurg Focus; 2012 Jul; 33(1):E8. PubMed ID: 22746240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Patients and clinicians as stakeholders in comparative effectiveness research: multiple perspectives and evolving roles.
Williams SS; Esposito D; Rich EC
J Comp Eff Res; 2014 Nov; 3(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 25494562
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Young adult and parent stakeholder perspectives on participation in patient-centered comparative effectiveness research.
Saunders T; Mackie TI; Shah S; Gooding H; de Ferranti SD; Leslie LK
J Comp Eff Res; 2016 Aug; 5(5):487-97. PubMed ID: 27427160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Opportunities and challenges for comparative effectiveness research (CER) with Electronic Clinical Data: a perspective from the EDM forum.
Holve E; Segal C; Hamilton Lopez M
Med Care; 2012 Jul; 50 Suppl():S11-8. PubMed ID: 22692252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute.
Frank L; Forsythe L; Ellis L; Schrandt S; Sheridan S; Gerson J; Konopka K; Daugherty S
Qual Life Res; 2015 May; 24(5):1033-41. PubMed ID: 25560774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bridging the divide: building infrastructure to support community-academic partnerships and improve capacity to conduct patient-centered outcomes research.
Huang J; Lipman PD; Daniel Mullins C
Transl Behav Med; 2017 Dec; 7(4):773-782. PubMed ID: 28374212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient engagement in patient-centered outcomes research: challenges, facilitators and actions to strengthen the field.
Ellis LE; Kass NE
J Comp Eff Res; 2017 Jun; 6(4):363-373. PubMed ID: 28621558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An official American Thoracic Society research statement: comparative effectiveness research in pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine.
Carson SS; Goss CH; Patel SR; Anzueto A; Au DH; Elborn S; Gerald JK; Gerald LB; Kahn JM; Malhotra A; Mularski RA; Riekert KA; Rubenfeld GD; Weaver TE; Krishnan JA;
Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 2013 Nov; 188(10):1253-61. PubMed ID: 24160906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The impact of comparative effectiveness research on interventional pain management: evolution from Medicare Modernization Act to Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
Manchikanti L; Falco FJ; Benyamin RM; Helm S; Parr AT; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2011; 14(3):E249-82. PubMed ID: 21587337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lessons on Patient and Stakeholder Engagement Strategies for Pipeline to Proposal Awards.
Wennerstrom A; Springgate BF; Jones F; Meyers D; Henderson N; Brown A; Niyogi A; Martin D; Smith J; Kirkland AL; Jones L; Norris KC
Ethn Dis; 2018; 28(Suppl 2):303-310. PubMed ID: 30202182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Translating comparative effectiveness research into Medicaid payment policy: views from medical and pharmacy directors.
Weissman JS; Westrich K; Hargraves JL; Pearson SD; Dubois R; Emond S; Olufajo OA
J Comp Eff Res; 2015 Mar; 4(2):79-88. PubMed ID: 25825839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluating patient and stakeholder engagement in research: moving from theory to practice.
Esmail L; Moore E; Rein A
J Comp Eff Res; 2015 Mar; 4(2):133-45. PubMed ID: 25825842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A tall order on a tight timeframe: stakeholder perspectives on comparative effectiveness research using electronic clinical data.
Holve E; Lopez MH; Scott L; Segal C
J Comp Eff Res; 2012 Sep; 1(5):441-51. PubMed ID: 24236421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient, caregiver and clinician views on engagement in comparative effectiveness research.
Forsythe LP; Frank LB; Workman TA; Hilliard T; Harwell D; Fayish L
J Comp Eff Res; 2017 May; 6(3):231-244. PubMed ID: 28173732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
