These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
430 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28622316)
21. Postoperative Efficacy, Predictability, Safety, and Visual Quality of Laser Corneal Refractive Surgery: A Network Meta-analysis. Wen D; McAlinden C; Flitcroft I; Tu R; Wang Q; Alió J; Marshall J; Huang Y; Song B; Hu L; Zhao Y; Zhu S; Gao R; Bao F; Yu A; Yu Y; Lian H; Huang J Am J Ophthalmol; 2017 Jun; 178():65-78. PubMed ID: 28336402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Review of Laser Vision Correction (LASIK, PRK and SMILE) with Simultaneous Accelerated Corneal Crosslinking - Long-term Results. Lim EWL; Lim L Curr Eye Res; 2019 Nov; 44(11):1171-1180. PubMed ID: 31411927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. In Vivo Corneal Biomechanical Response to Three Different Laser Corneal Refractive Surgeries. Qu Z; Li X; Yuan Y; Wang P; Li Y; Lin S; Lian H; Chen S; Ye Y; Wang J; Wu J; Elsheikh A; Bao F J Refract Surg; 2024 May; 40(5):e344-e352. PubMed ID: 38717086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Optical quality after myopic photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis: comparison using a double-pass system. Ondategui JC; Vilaseca M; Arjona M; Montasell A; Cardona G; Güell JL; Pujol J J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Jan; 38(1):16-27. PubMed ID: 22153091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Differences in Image Quality after Three Laser Keratorefractive Procedures for Myopia. Sarkar S; Devi P; Vaddavalli PK; Reddy JC; Bharadwaj SR Optom Vis Sci; 2022 Feb; 99(2):137-149. PubMed ID: 34974458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biology of keratorefractive surgery- PRK, PTK, LASIK, SMILE, inlays and other refractive procedures. Wilson SE Exp Eye Res; 2020 Sep; 198():108136. PubMed ID: 32653492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Intraocular Pressure Changes and Relationship With Corneal Biomechanics After SMILE and FS-LASIK. Li H; Wang Y; Dou R; Wei P; Zhang J; Zhao W; Li L Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Aug; 57(10):4180-6. PubMed ID: 27548888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of corneal sensation between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia. Li M; Zhou Z; Shen Y; Knorz MC; Gong L; Zhou X J Refract Surg; 2014 Feb; 30(2):94-100. PubMed ID: 24763474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Corneal biomechanical effects: small-incision lenticule extraction versus femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis. Wu D; Wang Y; Zhang L; Wei S; Tang X J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Jun; 40(6):954-62. PubMed ID: 24751146 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Aberration compensation between anterior and posterior corneal surfaces after Small incision lenticule extraction and Femtosecond laser-assisted laser in-situ keratomileusis. Li X; Wang Y; Dou R Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2015 Sep; 35(5):540-51. PubMed ID: 26087672 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Vector analysis of astigmatism correction after PRK, FS-LASIK, and SMILE for myopic astigmatism. Hashemi H; Asgari S; Khabazkhoob M; Heidari Z Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Nov; 43(11):3999-4009. PubMed ID: 37405568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Changes in custom biomechanical variables after femtosecond laser in situ keratomileusis and photorefractive keratectomy for myopia. Santhiago MR; Wilson SE; Hallahan KM; Smadja D; Lin M; Ambrosio R; Singh V; Sinha Roy A; Dupps WJ J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Jun; 40(6):918-28. PubMed ID: 24726160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. In vivo confocal microscopy of sub-basal corneal nerves and corneal densitometry after three kinds of refractive procedures for high myopia. Hou C; Li J; Li J; Peng H; Wang Q Int Ophthalmol; 2023 Mar; 43(3):925-935. PubMed ID: 36153757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: a prospective fellow eye study. Agca A; Ozgurhan EB; Demirok A; Bozkurt E; Celik U; Ozkaya A; Cankaya I; Yilmaz OF Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Apr; 37(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 23830802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Structural analysis of the cornea using scanning-slit corneal topography in eyes undergoing excimer laser refractive surgery. Kamiya K; Miyata K; Tokunaga T; Kiuchi T; Hiraoka T; Oshika T Cornea; 2004 Nov; 23(8 Suppl):S59-64. PubMed ID: 15448482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Factors that influence intraocular pressure changes after myopic and hyperopic LASIK and photorefractive keratectomy: a large population study. Schallhorn JM; Schallhorn SC; Ou Y Ophthalmology; 2015 Mar; 122(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 25444636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of the visual results after SMILE and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia. Lin F; Xu Y; Yang Y J Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 30(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 24702576 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Spherical and aspherical photorefractive keratectomy and laser in-situ keratomileusis for moderate to high myopia: two prospective, randomized clinical trials. Summit technology PRK-LASIK study group. Steinert RF; Hersh PS Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1998; 96():197-221; discussion 221-7. PubMed ID: 10360290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Regional analysis of posterior corneal elevation after laser refractive surgeries for correction of myopia of different degrees. Chen T; Li N; Ge T; Lin Y; Wu X; Gao H; Liu M Indian J Ophthalmol; 2024 Jun; 72(6):824-830. PubMed ID: 38317325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of ocular higher-order aberrations after SMILE and Wavefront-guided Femtosecond LASIK for myopia. Chen X; Wang Y; Zhang J; Yang SN; Li X; Zhang L BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):42. PubMed ID: 28388896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]