798 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28622410)
1. Accuracy of deformable image registration on magnetic resonance images in digital and physical phantoms.
Ger RB; Yang J; Ding Y; Jacobsen MC; Fuller CD; Howell RM; Li H; Jason Stafford R; Zhou S; Court LE
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5153-5161. PubMed ID: 28622410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Synthetic head and neck and phantom images for determining deformable image registration accuracy in magnetic resonance imaging.
Ger RB; Yang J; Ding Y; Jacobsen MC; Cardenas CE; Fuller CD; Howell RM; Li H; Stafford RJ; Zhou S; Court LE
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 30007075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of the accuracy of deformable image registration on MRI with a physical phantom.
Wu RY; Liu AY; Yang J; Williamson TD; Wisdom PG; Bronk L; Gao S; Grosshan DR; Fuller DC; Gunn GB; Ronald Zhu X; Frank SJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 21(1):166-173. PubMed ID: 31808307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multi-contrast four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (MC-4D-MRI): Development and initial evaluation in liver tumor patients.
Zhang L; Yin FF; Li T; Teng X; Xiao H; Harris W; Ren L; Kong FS; Ge H; Mao R; Cai J
Med Phys; 2021 Dec; 48(12):7984-7997. PubMed ID: 34706072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Skull phantom-based methodology to validate MRI co-registration accuracy for Gamma Knife radiosurgery.
Oglesby RT; Lam WW; Ruschin M; Holden L; Sarfehnia A; Yeboah C; Sahgal A; Soliman H; Detsky J; Tseng CL; Myrehaug S; Husain Z; Lau AZ; Stanisz GJ; Chugh BP
Med Phys; 2022 Nov; 49(11):7071-7084. PubMed ID: 35842918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of MR stereotactic imaging and image co-registration accuracy for 3 different MR scanners by 3 different methods/phantoms: phantom and patient study.
Paštyková V; Novotný J; Veselský T; Urgošík D; Liščák R; Vymazal J
J Neurosurg; 2018 Dec; 129(Suppl1):125-132. PubMed ID: 30544292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of deformable image registration algorithms on CT images of ex vivo porcine bladders with fiducial markers.
Wognum S; Heethuis SE; Rosario T; Hoogeman MS; Bel A
Med Phys; 2014 Jul; 41(7):071916. PubMed ID: 24989394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Narrow band deformable registration of prostate magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and computed tomography studies.
Schreibmann E; Xing L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jun; 62(2):595-605. PubMed ID: 15890605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The need for application-based adaptation of deformable image registration.
Kirby N; Chuang C; Ueda U; Pouliot J
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011702. PubMed ID: 23298072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A momentum-based diffeomorphic demons framework for deformable MR-CT image registration.
Han R; De Silva T; Ketcha M; Uneri A; Siewerdsen JH
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(21):215006. PubMed ID: 30353886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deep learning approaches using 2D and 3D convolutional neural networks for generating male pelvic synthetic computed tomography from magnetic resonance imaging.
Fu J; Yang Y; Singhrao K; Ruan D; Chu FI; Low DA; Lewis JH
Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):3788-3798. PubMed ID: 31220353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Resolution and registration in dual-plane co-RASOR MR.
McNabb E; Wong R; Noseworthy MD
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(21):215005. PubMed ID: 30260799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance evaluation of MIND demons deformable registration of MR and CT images in spinal interventions.
Reaungamornrat S; De Silva T; Uneri A; Goerres J; Jacobson M; Ketcha M; Vogt S; Kleinszig G; Khanna AJ; Wolinsky JP; Prince JL; Siewerdsen JH
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Dec; 61(23):8276-8297. PubMed ID: 27811396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Commissioning of a 4D MRI phantom for use in MR-guided radiotherapy.
Schneider S; Dolde K; Engler J; Hoffmann A; Pfaffenberger A
Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 30367485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR-based synthetic CT generation using a deep convolutional neural network method.
Han X
Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1408-1419. PubMed ID: 28192624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visibility and artifacts of gold fiducial markers used for image guided radiation therapy of pancreatic cancer on MRI.
Gurney-Champion OJ; Lens E; van der Horst A; Houweling AC; Klaassen R; van Hooft JE; Stoker J; van Tienhoven G; Nederveen AJ; Bel A
Med Phys; 2015 May; 42(5):2638-47. PubMed ID: 25979055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mapping of the prostate in endorectal coil-based MRI/MRSI and CT: a deformable registration and validation study.
Lian J; Xing L; Hunjan S; Dumoulin C; Levin J; Lo A; Watkins R; Rohling K; Giaquinto R; Kim D; Spielman D; Daniel B
Med Phys; 2004 Nov; 31(11):3087-94. PubMed ID: 15587662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Continuous table acquisition MRI for radiotherapy treatment planning: distortion assessment with a new extended 3D volumetric phantom.
Walker A; Liney G; Holloway L; Dowling J; Rivest-Henault D; Metcalfe P
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1982-91. PubMed ID: 25832089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Extra-dimensional Demons: a method for incorporating missing tissue in deformable image registration.
Nithiananthan S; Schafer S; Mirota DJ; Stayman JW; Zbijewski W; Reh DD; Gallia GL; Siewerdsen JH
Med Phys; 2012 Sep; 39(9):5718-31. PubMed ID: 22957637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of 12 DIR algorithms in low-contrast regions for mass and density conserving deformation.
Yeo UJ; Supple JR; Taylor ML; Smith R; Kron T; Franich RD
Med Phys; 2013 Oct; 40(10):101701. PubMed ID: 24089891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
