These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28622567)

  • 21. The Color Red Supports Avoidance Reactions to Unhealthy Food.
    Rohr M; Kamm F; Koenigstorfer J; Groeppel-Klein A; Wentura D
    Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(5):335-45. PubMed ID: 26592533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Do hedonic- versus nutrition-based attitudes toward food predict food choices? a cross-sectional study of 6- to 11-year-olds.
    Marty L; Miguet M; Bournez M; Nicklaus S; Chambaron S; Monnery-Patris S
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2017 Nov; 14(1):162. PubMed ID: 29178916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Can environmental traffic light warning labels reduce meat meal selection? A randomised experimental study with UK meat consumers.
    Hughes JP; Weick M; Vasiljevic M
    Appetite; 2024 Sep; 200():107500. PubMed ID: 38763297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Traffic-light labels and choice architecture: promoting healthy food choices.
    Thorndike AN; Riis J; Sonnenberg LM; Levy DE
    Am J Prev Med; 2014 Feb; 46(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 24439347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Food choices of minority and low-income employees: a cafeteria intervention.
    Levy DE; Riis J; Sonnenberg LM; Barraclough SJ; Thorndike AN
    Am J Prev Med; 2012 Sep; 43(3):240-8. PubMed ID: 22898116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Explaining the effects of a point-of-purchase nutrition-information intervention in university canteens: a structural equation modelling analysis.
    Hoefkens C; Pieniak Z; Van Camp J; Verbeke W
    Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act; 2012 Sep; 9():111. PubMed ID: 22967195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of traffic light labelling versus cartoon labelling on food and beverage purchases in a children's hospital setting.
    Whitt OR; Jilcott Pitts SB; Rafferty AP; Payne CR; Ng SW
    Pediatr Obes; 2018 Apr; 13(4):265-268. PubMed ID: 28752540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Impact of food labelling systems on food choices and eating behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies.
    Cecchini M; Warin L
    Obes Rev; 2016 Mar; 17(3):201-10. PubMed ID: 26693944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Determinants of meal satisfaction in a workplace environment.
    Haugaard P; Stancu CM; Brockhoff PB; Thorsdottir I; Lähteenmäki L
    Appetite; 2016 Oct; 105():195-203. PubMed ID: 27235825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Scoping study investigating stakeholder perceptions and use of school canteens in an Australian city.
    Lawlis T; Eckley D; Jamieson M; Knox M
    Nutr Diet; 2017 Nov; 74(5):502-508. PubMed ID: 29130292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Workforce gender, company size and corporate financial support are predictors of availability of healthy meals in Danish worksite canteens.
    Thorsen AV; Lassen AD; Andersen JS; Mikkelsen BE
    Public Health Nutr; 2009 Nov; 12(11):2068-73. PubMed ID: 19433006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of price and information on the food choices of women university students in Saudi Arabia: An experimental study.
    Halimic A; Gage H; Raats M; Williams P
    Appetite; 2018 Apr; 123():175-182. PubMed ID: 29247797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sociodemographic disparities among fast-food restaurant customers who notice and use calorie menu labels.
    Green JE; Brown AG; Ohri-Vachaspati P
    J Acad Nutr Diet; 2015 Jul; 115(7):1093-101. PubMed ID: 25659920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Back-of-pack information in substitutive food choices: A process-tracking study in participants intending to eat healthy.
    van Buul VJ; Bolman CAW; Brouns FJPH; Lechner L
    Appetite; 2017 Sep; 116():173-183. PubMed ID: 28472643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Nutritional content of foods offered and consumed in a Spanish university canteen.
    Fernández Torres Á; Moreno-Rojas R; Cámara Martos F
    Nutr Hosp; 2014 Sep; 31(3):1302-8. PubMed ID: 25726226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Nudging and social marketing techniques encourage employees to make healthier food choices: a randomized controlled trial in 30 worksite cafeterias in The Netherlands.
    Velema E; Vyth EL; Hoekstra T; Steenhuis IHM
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2018 Feb; 107(2):236-246. PubMed ID: 29474510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Experience of Using an Online Pre-Ordering System for A Workplace Canteen That Offers Lower-Energy Swaps: A Think-Aloud Study.
    Breathnach S; Llewellyn CH; Koutoukidis DA; van Rugge CR; Sutherland A; Lally P
    Nutrients; 2020 Dec; 12(12):. PubMed ID: 33353077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Social norms and financial incentives to promote employees' healthy food choices: A randomized controlled trial.
    Thorndike AN; Riis J; Levy DE
    Prev Med; 2016 May; 86():12-8. PubMed ID: 26827617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Submissions to the Australian and New Zealand Review of Food Labelling Law and Policy support traffic light nutrition labelling.
    White J; Signal L
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2012 Oct; 36(5):446-51. PubMed ID: 23025366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Traffic light labelling of meals to promote sustainable consumption and healthy eating.
    Osman M; Thornton K
    Appetite; 2019 Jul; 138():60-71. PubMed ID: 30880087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.