These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28622615)

  • 1. Domain-general neural correlates of dependency formation: Using complex tones to simulate language.
    Brilmayer I; Sassenhagen J; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I; Schlesewsky M
    Cortex; 2017 Aug; 93():50-67. PubMed ID: 28622615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neural mechanisms of sentence comprehension based on predictive processes and decision certainty: Electrophysiological evidence from non-canonical linearizations in a flexible word order language.
    Dröge A; Fleischer J; Schlesewsky M; Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I
    Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 1633():149-166. PubMed ID: 26740402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The P3b and P600(s): Positive contributions to language comprehension.
    Leckey M; Federmeier KD
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Jul; 57(7):e13351. PubMed ID: 30802979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Localization of electrophysiological responses to semantic and syntactic anomalies in language comprehension with MEG.
    Kielar A; Panamsky L; Links KA; Meltzer JA
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jan; 105():507-24. PubMed ID: 25463470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Late interaction of syntactic and prosodic processes in sentence comprehension as revealed by ERPs.
    Eckstein K; Friederici AD
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):130-43. PubMed ID: 15967649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. P600 alteration of syntactic language processing in patients with bipolar mania: Comparison to schizophrenic patients and healthy subjects.
    Lee CW; Kim SH; Shim M; Ryu V; Ha RY; Lee SJ; Cho HS
    J Affect Disord; 2016 Sep; 201():101-11. PubMed ID: 27195515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interplay between syntax and semantics during sentence comprehension: ERP effects of combining syntactic and semantic violations.
    Hagoort P
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Aug; 15(6):883-99. PubMed ID: 14511541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of mood on the processing of syntactic anomalies: evidence from P600.
    Vissers CT; Virgillito D; Fitzgerald DA; Speckens AE; Tendolkar I; van Oostrom I; Chwilla DJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Oct; 48(12):3521-31. PubMed ID: 20696180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Neurocomputational Model of the N400 and the P600 in Language Processing.
    Brouwer H; Crocker MW; Venhuizen NJ; Hoeks JCJ
    Cogn Sci; 2017 May; 41 Suppl 6(Suppl Suppl 6):1318-1352. PubMed ID: 28000963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When word category information encounters morphosyntax: an ERP study.
    Rossi S; Gugler MF; Hahne A; Friederici AD
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Aug; 384(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 15893877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Think globally: cross-linguistic variation in electrophysiological activity during sentence comprehension.
    Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I; Kretzschmar F; Tune S; Wang L; Genç S; Philipp M; Roehm D; Schlesewsky M
    Brain Lang; 2011 Jun; 117(3):133-52. PubMed ID: 20970843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Grammatical agreement processing in reading: ERP findings and future directions.
    Molinaro N; Barber HA; Carreiras M
    Cortex; 2011 Sep; 47(8):908-30. PubMed ID: 21458791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Finding the P3 in the P600: Decoding shared neural mechanisms of responses to syntactic violations and oddball targets.
    Sassenhagen J; Fiebach CJ
    Neuroimage; 2019 Oct; 200():425-436. PubMed ID: 31229659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monitoring in language perception: evidence from ERPs in a picture-sentence matching task.
    Vissers CT; Kolk HH; van de Meerendonk N; Chwilla DJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Mar; 46(4):967-82. PubMed ID: 18199460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ERP effects of the processing of syntactic long-distance dependencies.
    Phillips C; Kazanina N; Abada SH
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Mar; 22(3):407-28. PubMed ID: 15722211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An alternative perspective on "semantic P600" effects in language comprehension.
    Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I; Schlesewsky M
    Brain Res Rev; 2008 Nov; 59(1):55-73. PubMed ID: 18617270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components.
    Van Petten C; Luka BJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Feb; 83(2):176-90. PubMed ID: 22019481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Semantics does not need a processing license from syntax in reading Chinese.
    Zhang Y; Yu J; Boland JE
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):765-81. PubMed ID: 20438271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neural mechanisms of language comprehension: challenges to syntax.
    Kuperberg GR
    Brain Res; 2007 May; 1146():23-49. PubMed ID: 17400197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combined eye tracking and fMRI reveals neural basis of linguistic predictions during sentence comprehension.
    Bonhage CE; Mueller JL; Friederici AD; Fiebach CJ
    Cortex; 2015 Jul; 68():33-47. PubMed ID: 26003489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.