These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28624279)
1. The use of national-level data to describe trends in intramammary antimicrobial usage on Irish dairy farms from 2003 to 2015. More SJ; Clegg TA; McCoy F J Dairy Sci; 2017 Aug; 100(8):6400-6413. PubMed ID: 28624279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Trends in estimated intramammary antimicrobial usage in the Irish dairy industry from 2003 to 2019. McAloon CI; McCoy F; More SJ JDS Commun; 2021 Sep; 2(5):271-276. PubMed ID: 36338384 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of different scenarios for selective dry-cow therapy on udder health, antimicrobial usage, and economics. Scherpenzeel CGM; den Uijl IEM; van Schaik G; Riekerink RGMO; Hogeveen H; Lam TJGM J Dairy Sci; 2016 May; 99(5):3753-3764. PubMed ID: 26947289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Antimicrobial and teat sealant use and selection criteria at dry-off on Canadian dairy farms. McCubbin KD; de Jong E; Brummelhuis CM; Bodaneze J; Biesheuvel M; Kelton DF; Uyama T; Dufour S; Sanchez J; Rizzo D; Léger D; Barkema HW J Dairy Sci; 2023 Oct; 106(10):7104-7116. PubMed ID: 37500435 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of selective dry cow treatment following on-farm culture: risk of postcalving intramammary infection and clinical mastitis in the subsequent lactation. Cameron M; McKenna SL; MacDonald KA; Dohoo IR; Roy JP; Keefe GP J Dairy Sci; 2014; 97(1):270-84. PubMed ID: 24183691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of selective dry cow treatment following on-farm culture: Milk yield and somatic cell count in the subsequent lactation. Cameron M; Keefe GP; Roy JP; Stryhn H; Dohoo IR; McKenna SL J Dairy Sci; 2015 Apr; 98(4):2427-36. PubMed ID: 25648799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An observational cohort study on antimicrobial usage on dairy farms in Quebec, Canada. Lardé H; Dufour S; Archambault M; Massé J; Roy JP; Francoz D J Dairy Sci; 2021 Feb; 104(2):1864-1880. PubMed ID: 33272584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intramammary antimicrobial sales in Ireland: a 2020 descriptive update. McAloon CI; McCoy F; More SJ Ir Vet J; 2022 Mar; 75(1):5. PubMed ID: 35346365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Composition of the teat canal and intramammary microbiota of dairy cows subjected to antimicrobial dry cow therapy and internal teat sealant. Derakhshani H; Plaizier JC; De Buck J; Barkema HW; Khafipour E J Dairy Sci; 2018 Nov; 101(11):10191-10205. PubMed ID: 30172408 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of internal teat sealant products (Teatseal and Orbeseal) on intramammary infection, clinical mastitis, and somatic cell counts in lactating dairy cows: a meta-analysis. Rabiee AR; Lean IJ J Dairy Sci; 2013; 96(11):6915-6931. PubMed ID: 24054298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of cephalonium alone and in combination with an internal teat sealant for dry cow therapy in seasonally calving dairy cows. Bates AJ; Chambers G; Laven RA N Z Vet J; 2016 Mar; 64(2):95-100. PubMed ID: 26377164 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of dry period length on the effect of an intramammary teat sealant on the risk of mastitis in cattle treated with antibiotics at drying off. Laven RA; Balcomb CC; Tulley WT; Lawrence KE N Z Vet J; 2014 Jul; 62(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 24472043 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantification of antimicrobial usage in adult cows and preweaned calves on 40 large Wisconsin dairy farms using dose-based and mass-based metrics. de Campos JL; Kates A; Steinberger A; Sethi A; Suen G; Shutske J; Safdar N; Goldberg T; Ruegg PL J Dairy Sci; 2021 Apr; 104(4):4727-4745. PubMed ID: 33551167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Insights into udder health and intramammary antibiotic usage on Irish dairy farms during 2003-2010. More SJ; Clegg TA; O'Grady L Ir Vet J; 2012 Mar; 65(1):7. PubMed ID: 22455802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quantification of antimicrobial usage in dairy cows and preweaned calves in Argentina. González Pereyra V; Pol M; Pastorino F; Herrero A Prev Vet Med; 2015 Dec; 122(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 26558514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of reduced intramammary antimicrobial use during the dry period on udder health in Dutch dairy herds. Vanhoudt A; van Hees-Huijps K; van Knegsel ATM; Sampimon OC; Vernooij JCM; Nielen M; van Werven T J Dairy Sci; 2018 Apr; 101(4):3248-3260. PubMed ID: 29395142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Changes in mammary infection status in dairy cows during the dry period using dry cow therapy approaches on three farms. Nagahata H; Komori N; Fukutome M; Sugiura T; Hisaeda K; Gondaira S; Higuchi H; Ando T; Nakada K Anim Sci J; 2024; 95(1):e13993. PubMed ID: 39352224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Treatment practices and quantification of antimicrobial drug usage in conventional and organic dairy farms in Wisconsin. Pol M; Ruegg PL J Dairy Sci; 2007 Jan; 90(1):249-61. PubMed ID: 17183093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of an intramammary teat seal on new intramammary infections. Berry EA; Hillerton JE J Dairy Sci; 2002 Oct; 85(10):2512-20. PubMed ID: 12416803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Antimicrobial use and farmers' attitude toward mastitis treatment on dairy farms with automatic or conventional milking systems. Deng Z; Lam TJGM; Hogeveen H; Spaninks M; Heij N; Postema M; van Werven T; Koop G J Dairy Sci; 2020 Aug; 103(8):7302-7314. PubMed ID: 32475666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]