These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
444 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28624647)
61. Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy and Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration for Solid Pancreatic Lesions. Sur YK; Kim YC; Kim JK; Lee JH; Yoo BM; Kim YB J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Dec; 34(12):2163-9. PubMed ID: 26491091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Comparison of 22G reverse-beveled versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic lesions. Alatawi A; Beuvon F; Grabar S; Leblanc S; Chaussade S; Terris B; Barret M; Prat F United European Gastroenterol J; 2015 Aug; 3(4):343-52. PubMed ID: 26279842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Feasibility and efficiency of a new 22G core needle: a prospective comparison study. Hucl T; Wee E; Anuradha S; Gupta R; Ramchandani M; Rakesh K; Shrestha R; Reddy DN; Lakhtakia S Endoscopy; 2013 Oct; 45(10):792-8. PubMed ID: 24068588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Diagnostic performance and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration/biopsy for gallbladder lesions. Kuraishi Y; Hara K; Haba S; Kuwahara T; Okuno N; Yanaidani T; Ishikawa S; Yasuda T; Yamada M; Fukui T; Mizuno N Dig Endosc; 2024 Feb; 36(2):206-214. PubMed ID: 37186389 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Fork-tip needle biopsy versus fine-needle aspiration in endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized crossover study. Oppong KW; Bekkali NLH; Leeds JS; Johnson SJ; Nayar MK; Darné A; Egan M; Bassett P; Haugk B Endoscopy; 2020 Jun; 52(6):454-461. PubMed ID: 32162287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Current status of newer generation endoscopic ultrasound core needles in the diagnostic evaluation of gastrointestinal lesions. Soltani AK; Krishnan K J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2020; 9(5):389-395. PubMed ID: 32680792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Comparing per-pass performance of 2 types of needles for EUS-guided fine-needle biopsy sampling of pancreatobiliary masses in a randomized trial. Mohamadnejad M; Mirzaie V; Sotoudeh M; Nikmanesh A; Hosseini R; Muthusamy R Gastrointest Endosc; 2023 Sep; 98(3):371-380. PubMed ID: 37098399 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. The 25-gauge EUS-FNA needle: Good for on-site but poor for off-site evaluation? Results of a randomized trial. Varadarajulu S; Bang JY; Holt BA; Hasan MK; Logue A; Hawes RH; Hebert-Magee S Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1056-63. PubMed ID: 24973173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Tissue amount and diagnostic yield of a novel franseen EUS-FNB and a standard EUS-FNA needle-A randomized controlled study in solid pancreatic lesions. Kovacevic B; Toxværd A; Klausen P; Larsen MH; Grützmeier S; Detlefsen S; Karstensen JG; Brink L; Hassan H; Høgdall E; Vilmann P Endosc Ultrasound; 2023; 12(3):319-325. PubMed ID: 37693112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. High Sensitivity of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration and Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy in Lymphadenopathy Caused by Metastatic Disease: A Prospective Comparative Study. Hedenström P; Chatzikyriakos V; Shams R; Lewerin C; Sadik R Clin Endosc; 2021 Sep; 54(5):722-729. PubMed ID: 33657782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. A prospective multicenter evaluation of a new side-port endoscopic ultrasound-fine-needle aspiration in solid upper gastrointestinal lesions. Kaffes AJ; Chen RY; Tam W; Norton I; Cho S; Devereaux B; Vaughan R Dig Endosc; 2012 Nov; 24(6):448-51. PubMed ID: 23078438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Comparison of 19G FNA Versus 22G FNB Needles for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Sampling of Subepithelial Tumors: Is Bigger Better? Li J; Feng J; Gao S; Wang W; Huang L; Yi S; Xu H; Ding XW J Ultrasound Med; 2024 Apr; 43(4):761-770. PubMed ID: 38167820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Is contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy better than conventional fine needle biopsy? A retrospective study in a medical center. Lai JH; Lin CC; Lin HH; Chen MJ Surg Endosc; 2022 Aug; 36(8):6138-6143. PubMed ID: 35484412 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Feasibility of a 20-gauge ProCore needle in EUS-guided subepithelial tumor sampling: a prospective multicenter study. Kim DH; Kim GH; Cho CM; Park CH; Na SY; Kim TH; Cho YK; Kim JH; Seo DW; BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Oct; 18(1):151. PubMed ID: 30340469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Utility of endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle biopsy (EUS-FNB) for diagnosing small subepithelial lesions (< 20 mm). Sekine M; Miura T; Fujiwara J; Uehara T; Asano T; Matsumoto S; Miyatani H; Mashima H J Ultrasound; 2022 Mar; 25(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 33511507 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. The clinical impact of immediate on-site cytopathology evaluation during endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic masses: a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. Wani S; Mullady D; Early DS; Rastogi A; Collins B; Wang JF; Marshall C; Sams SB; Yen R; Rizeq M; Romanas M; Ulusarac O; Brauer B; Attwell A; Gaddam S; Hollander TG; Hosford L; Johnson S; Kushnir V; Amateau SK; Kohlmeier C; Azar RR; Vargo J; Fukami N; Shah RJ; Das A; Edmundowicz SA Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Oct; 110(10):1429-39. PubMed ID: 26346868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Comparison of modified wet suction technique and dry suction technique in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for solid lesions: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Wang Y; Chen Q; Wang J; Wu X; Duan Y; Yin P; Guo Q; Hou W; Cheng B Trials; 2018 Jan; 19(1):45. PubMed ID: 29343303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]