These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28626203)

  • 21. Flowability of composites is no guarantee for contraction stress reduction.
    Cadenaro M; Marchesi G; Antoniolli F; Davidson C; De Stefano Dorigo E; Breschi L
    Dent Mater; 2009 May; 25(5):649-54. PubMed ID: 19136149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Initial dynamic viscoelasticity change of composites during light curing.
    Kim MH; Min SH; Ferracane J; Lee IB
    Dent Mater; 2010 May; 26(5):463-70. PubMed ID: 20170947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Contraction stress, elastic modulus, and degree of conversion of three flowable composites.
    Cadenaro M; Codan B; Navarra CO; Marchesi G; Turco G; Di Lenarda R; Breschi L
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2011 Jun; 119(3):241-5. PubMed ID: 21564319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Polymerization shrinkage of flowable resin-based restorative materials.
    Stavridakis MM; Dietschi D; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):118-28. PubMed ID: 15765967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Shear modulus of 5 flowable composites to the EverStick Ortho fiber-reinforced composite retainer: an in-vitro study.
    Brauchli L; Pintus S; Steineck M; Lüthy H; Wichelhaus A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):54-8. PubMed ID: 19121501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Differences in color, translucency and fluorescence between flowable and universal resin composites.
    Yu B; Lee YK
    J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):840-6. PubMed ID: 18621459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of resin matrix composition on the polymerization shrinkage and rheological properties of experimental dental composites.
    Ellakwa A; Cho N; Lee IB
    Dent Mater; 2007 Oct; 23(10):1229-35. PubMed ID: 17182093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Shear bond strength of new self-adhesive flowable composite resins.
    Wajdowicz MN; Vandewalle KS; Means MT
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(2):e104-8. PubMed ID: 22414513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Surface morphology and mechanical properties of new-generation flowable resin composites for dental restoration.
    Salerno M; Derchi G; Thorat S; Ceseracciu L; Ruffilli R; Barone AC
    Dent Mater; 2011 Dec; 27(12):1221-8. PubMed ID: 22000067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of rheological behaviour of flowable dental composites reinforced with low aspect ratio micro-sized glass fibres.
    Behl S; Farahani AD; Raju ; Rajan G; Ellakwa A; Farrar P; Thordarson P; Prusty BG
    Dent Mater; 2021 Jan; 37(1):131-142. PubMed ID: 33309321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Properties of composite materials used for bracket bonding.
    Gama AC; Moraes AG; Yamasaki LC; Loguercio AD; Carvalho CN; Bauer J
    Braz Dent J; 2013; 24(3):279-83. PubMed ID: 23969920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative radiopacity of six flowable resin composites.
    Ergücü Z; Türkün LS; Onem E; Güneri P
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(4):436-40. PubMed ID: 20672728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Nanoindentation creep versus bulk compressive creep of dental resin-composites.
    El-Safty S; Silikas N; Akhtar R; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2012 Nov; 28(11):1171-82. PubMed ID: 22999374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of the wear and flexural characteristics of flowable resin composites for posterior lesions.
    Sumino N; Tsubota K; Takamizawa T; Shiratsuchi K; Miyazaki M; Latta MA
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2013; 71(3-4):820-7. PubMed ID: 23638859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Are the flowable composites suitable for orthodontic bracket bonding?
    Uysal T; Sari Z; Demir A
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Oct; 74(5):697-702. PubMed ID: 15529507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The new generation of conventional and bulk-fill composites do not reduce the shrinkage stress in endodontically-treated molars.
    Oliveira Schliebe LRS; Lourenço Braga SS; da Silva Pereira RA; Bicalho AA; Veríssimo C; Novais VR; Versluis A; Soares CJ
    Am J Dent; 2016 Dec; 29(6):333-338. PubMed ID: 29178721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Viscosity and stickiness of dental resin composites at elevated temperatures.
    Loumprinis N; Maier E; Belli R; Petschelt A; Eliades G; Lohbauer U
    Dent Mater; 2021 Mar; 37(3):413-422. PubMed ID: 33353736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An effective method for spreading flowable composites in resin-based restorations.
    Abedian B; Millstein P
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(1):151-4. PubMed ID: 16536207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Rheological study of hard resin for crown and bridge].
    Izumida A; Tomota K; Kimura K; Komatsu M; Okuno O
    Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 2006 Jul; 50(3):396-404. PubMed ID: 17159286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Immediate versus water-storage performance of Class V flowable composite restoratives.
    Irie M; Hatanaka K; Suzuki K; Watts DC
    Dent Mater; 2006 Sep; 22(9):875-83. PubMed ID: 16837038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.