BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28626775)

  • 1. Referential choice in a second language: evidence for a listener-oriented approach.
    Contemori C; Dussias PE
    Lang Cogn Neurosci; 2016; 31(10):1257-1272. PubMed ID: 28626775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Avoiding gender ambiguous pronouns in French.
    Fukumura K; Pozniak C; Alario FX
    Cognition; 2022 Jan; 218():104909. PubMed ID: 34649089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Who Is He? Children with ASD and ADHD Take the Listener into Account in Their Production of Ambiguous Pronouns.
    Kuijper SJ; Hartman CA; Hendriks P
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132408. PubMed ID: 26147200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Referential choice across the lifespan: why children and elderly adults produce ambiguous pronouns.
    Hendriks P; Koster C; Hoeks JC
    Lang Cogn Process; 2014 May; 29(4):391-407. PubMed ID: 24771955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pronoun Interpretation in the Second Language: Effects of Computational Complexity.
    Slabakova R; White L; Brambatti Guzzo N
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1236. PubMed ID: 28785234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Producing pronouns and definite noun phrases: do speakers use the addressee's discourse model?
    Fukumura K; van Gompel RP
    Cogn Sci; 2012; 36(7):1289-311. PubMed ID: 22671693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Referential Cohesion in the Narratives of Bilingual and Monolingual Children With Typically Developing Language and With Specific Language Impairment.
    Fichman S; Altman C
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 62(1):123-142. PubMed ID: 30950755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Representations underlying pronoun choice in Italian and English.
    Fukumura K; Hervé C; Villata S; Zhang S; Foppolo F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Aug; 75(8):1428-1447. PubMed ID: 34609230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does L2 Proficiency Impact L2-L1 Transfer While Reading L1 Collocations? Evidence From Behavioral and ERP Data.
    Otwinowska A; Marecka M; Casado A; Durlik J; Szewczyk J; Opacki M; Wodniecka Z
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():673761. PubMed ID: 34658998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Demonstrative systems: From linguistic typology to social cognition.
    Rubio-Fernandez P
    Cogn Psychol; 2022 Dec; 139():101519. PubMed ID: 36436352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of semantic similarity on Mandarin speakers' referential expressions.
    Zhou Y; Branigan HP; Yu Y; Pickering MJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 Nov; 76(11):2579-2595. PubMed ID: 36655936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of Referential Discourse Contexts in L2 Offline and Online Sentence Processing.
    Yang PL
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2016 Oct; 45(5):1045-65. PubMed ID: 26349999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effects of Over- and Under-Specified Linguistic Input on L2 Online Processing of Referring Expressions.
    Wu S; Liu D; Huang S
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2023 Feb; 52(1):283-305. PubMed ID: 35527325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Overinformative Speakers Are Cooperative: Revisiting the Gricean Maxim of Quantity.
    Rubio-Fernandez P
    Cogn Sci; 2019 Nov; 43(11):e12797. PubMed ID: 31742756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The acquisition of the English plural morpheme by native Mandarin Chinese-speaking children.
    Jia G
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2003 Dec; 46(6):1297-311. PubMed ID: 14700356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cognitive Modeling of Individual Variation in Reference Production and Comprehension.
    Hendriks P
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():506. PubMed ID: 27092101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Confusing similar words: ERP correlates of lexical-semantic processing in first language attrition and late second language acquisition.
    Kasparian K; Steinhauer K
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Dec; 93(Pt A):200-217. PubMed ID: 27751710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Greater entropy leads to more explicit referential forms during language production.
    Karimi H
    Cognition; 2022 Aug; 225():105093. PubMed ID: 35305301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How Does Topicality Affect the Choice of Referential Form? Evidence From Mandarin.
    Lam SY; Hwang H
    Cogn Sci; 2022 Oct; 46(10):e13190. PubMed ID: 36240465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How Cognitive Load Influences Speakers' Choice of Referring Expressions.
    Vogels J; Krahmer E; Maes A
    Cogn Sci; 2015 Aug; 39(6):1396-418. PubMed ID: 25471259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.