BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28627047)

  • 1. Hysterectomy trends in Australia, 2000-2001 to 2013-2014: joinpoint regression analysis.
    Wilson LF; Pandeya N; Mishra GD
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Oct; 96(10):1170-1179. PubMed ID: 28627047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hysterectomy-corrected cervical cancer mortality rates reveal a larger racial disparity in the United States.
    Beavis AL; Gravitt PE; Rositch AF
    Cancer; 2017 May; 123(6):1044-1050. PubMed ID: 28112816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Persistent high rates of hysterectomy in Western Australia: a population-based study of 83 000 procedures over 23 years.
    Spilsbury K; Semmens JB; Hammond I; Bolck A
    BJOG; 2006 Jul; 113(7):804-9. PubMed ID: 16827764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hysterectomy trends in Australia--between 2000/01 and 2004/05.
    Hill EL; Graham ML; Shelley JM
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010 Apr; 50(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 20522072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Population-based Study of Invasive Cervical Cancer Patients in Beijing: 1993-2008.
    Wang T; Wu MH; Wu YM; Zhang WY
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Dec; 128(24):3298-304. PubMed ID: 26668143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cervical cancer incidence trends in Canada: a 30-year population-based analysis.
    Mosavi-Jarrahi A; Kliewer EV
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Jul; 35(7):620-626. PubMed ID: 23876639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Historical and projected hysterectomy rates in the USA: Implications for future observed cervical cancer rates and evaluating prevention interventions.
    Simms KT; Yuill S; Killen J; Smith MA; Kulasingam S; de Kok IMCM; van Ballegooijen M; Burger EA; Regan C; Kim JJ; Canfell K
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Sep; 158(3):710-718. PubMed ID: 32723676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The temporal and age-dependent patterns of hysterectomy-corrected cervical cancer incidence rates in Denmark: a population-based cohort study.
    Hammer A; Kahlert J; Rositch A; Pedersen L; Gravitt P; Blaakaer J; Soegaard M
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2017 Feb; 96(2):150-157. PubMed ID: 27861705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Hysterectomy and its impact on the calculated incidence of cervical cancer and screening coverage in Denmark.
    Lam JU; Lynge E; Njor SH; Rebolj M
    Acta Oncol; 2015; 54(8):1136-43. PubMed ID: 25800858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hysterectomy prevalence and adjusted cervical and uterine cancer rates in England and Wales.
    Redburn JC; Murphy MF
    BJOG; 2001 Apr; 108(4):388-95. PubMed ID: 11305546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Declining hysterectomy prevalence and the estimated impact on uterine cancer incidence in Scotland.
    Ruiz de Azua Unzurrunzaga G; Brewster DH; Wild SH; Sivalingam VN
    Cancer Epidemiol; 2019 Apr; 59():227-231. PubMed ID: 30836220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Trends in Hysterectomy Incidence Rates During 2000-2015 in Denmark: Shifting from Abdominal to Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures.
    Lycke KD; Kahlert J; Damgaard R; Mogensen O; Hammer A
    Clin Epidemiol; 2021; 13():407-416. PubMed ID: 34103999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Temporal Changes in Incidence Rates of the Most Common Gynecological Cancers in the Female Population in Central Serbia.
    Stojanovic MM; Rancic NK; Andjelković Apostolović MR; Ignjatović AM; Stojanovic DR; Mitic Lakusic VR; Ilic MV
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2022 Feb; 58(2):. PubMed ID: 35208629
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. National trends of adnexal surgeries at the time of hysterectomy for benign indication, United States, 1998-2011.
    Mikhail E; Salemi JL; Mogos MF; Hart S; Salihu HM; Imudia AN
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Nov; 213(5):713.e1-13. PubMed ID: 25935772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Inpatient hysterectomy surveillance in the United States, 2000-2004.
    Whiteman MK; Hillis SD; Jamieson DJ; Morrow B; Podgornik MN; Brett KM; Marchbanks PA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 198(1):34.e1-7. PubMed ID: 17981254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Trends and patterns of ovarian cancer mortality in Belgrade, Serbia: a joinpoint regression analysis.
    Kisic Tepavcevic D; Matejic B; Gazibara T; Pekmezovic T
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Aug; 21(6):1018-23. PubMed ID: 21738042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Trend analysis of cervical cancer incidence and mortality rates in Chinese women during 1989-2008].
    Hu SY; Zheng RS; Zhao FH; Zhang SW; Chen WQ; Qiao YL
    Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2014 Apr; 36(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 24791788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of hysterectomy on the age-specific incidence of cervical and uterine cancer in Germany and other countries.
    Stang A
    Eur J Public Health; 2013 Oct; 23(5):879-83. PubMed ID: 22711786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictors of hysterectomy as a treatment for menstrual symptoms.
    Graham M; James EL; Keleher H
    Womens Health Issues; 2008; 18(4):319-27. PubMed ID: 18590884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hysterectomy prevalence and death rates for cervical cancer--United States, 1965-1988.
    Centers for Disease Control (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 1992 Jan; 41(2):17-20. PubMed ID: 1728728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.