These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28627311)

  • 1. Landmark cure rate models with time-dependent covariates.
    Shi H; Yin G
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2042-2054. PubMed ID: 28627311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dynamic prediction by landmarking in competing risks.
    Nicolaie MA; van Houwelingen JC; de Witte TM; Putter H
    Stat Med; 2013 May; 32(12):2031-47. PubMed ID: 23086627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of joint modeling and landmarking for dynamic prediction under an illness-death model.
    Suresh K; Taylor JMG; Spratt DE; Daignault S; Tsodikov A
    Biom J; 2017 Nov; 59(6):1277-1300. PubMed ID: 28508545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multiple imputation for cure rate quantile regression with censored data.
    Wu Y; Yin G
    Biometrics; 2017 Mar; 73(1):94-103. PubMed ID: 27479513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mixture cure model with random effects for clustered interval-censored survival data.
    Xiang L; Ma X; Yau KK
    Stat Med; 2011 Apr; 30(9):995-1006. PubMed ID: 21472759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation method of the semiparametric mixture cure gamma frailty model.
    Peng Y; Zhang J
    Stat Med; 2008 Nov; 27(25):5177-94. PubMed ID: 18613271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Landmarking 2.0: Bridging the gap between joint models and landmarking.
    Putter H; van Houwelingen HC
    Stat Med; 2022 May; 41(11):1901-1917. PubMed ID: 35098578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semiparametric accelerated failure time cure rate mixture models with competing risks.
    Choi S; Zhu L; Huang X
    Stat Med; 2018 Jan; 37(1):48-59. PubMed ID: 28983935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dynamic prediction of recurrent events data by landmarking with application to a follow-up study of patients after kidney transplant.
    Musoro JZ; Struijk GH; Geskus RB; Ten Berge I; Zwinderman AH
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):832-845. PubMed ID: 27142981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new estimation method for the semiparametric accelerated failure time mixture cure model.
    Zhang J; Peng Y
    Stat Med; 2007 Jul; 26(16):3157-71. PubMed ID: 17094075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Random survival forests for dynamic predictions of a time-to-event outcome using a longitudinal biomarker.
    Pickett KL; Suresh K; Campbell KR; Davis S; Juarez-Colunga E
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Oct; 21(1):216. PubMed ID: 34657597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing the prediction accuracy of cure in the Cox proportional hazards cure model: an application to breast cancer data.
    Asano J; Hirakawa A; Hamada C
    Pharm Stat; 2014; 13(6):357-63. PubMed ID: 25044997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Landmark estimation of transition probabilities in non-Markov multi-state models with covariates.
    Hoff R; Putter H; Mehlum IS; Gran JM
    Lifetime Data Anal; 2019 Oct; 25(4):660-680. PubMed ID: 30997582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing the effect of a partly unobserved, exogenous, binary time-dependent covariate on survival probabilities using generalised pseudo-values.
    Pötschger U; Heinzl H; Valsecchi MG; Mittlböck M
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Jan; 18(1):14. PubMed ID: 29351735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A censored quantile regression approach for the analysis of time to event data.
    Xue X; Xie X; Strickler HD
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):955-965. PubMed ID: 27166408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time-dependent covariates in the proportional subdistribution hazards model for competing risks.
    Beyersmann J; Schumacher M
    Biostatistics; 2008 Oct; 9(4):765-76. PubMed ID: 18434297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Data generation for the Cox proportional hazards model with time-dependent covariates: a method for medical researchers.
    Hendry DJ
    Stat Med; 2014 Feb; 33(3):436-54. PubMed ID: 24014094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Prediction accuracy for the cure probabilities in mixture cure models.
    Jiang W; Sun H; Peng Y
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Oct; 26(5):2029-2041. PubMed ID: 28523948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Partly conditional estimation of the effect of a time-dependent factor in the presence of dependent censoring.
    Gong Q; Schaubel DE
    Biometrics; 2013 Jun; 69(2):338-47. PubMed ID: 23635094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. geecure: An R-package for marginal proportional hazards mixture cure models.
    Niu Y; Wang X; Peng Y
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jul; 161():115-124. PubMed ID: 29852954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.