These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28627958)

  • 1. Pushed monocanalicular intubation versus probing for the treatment of simple and incomplete complex types of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children older than 18 months old.
    Eshraghi B; Khalilipour E; Ameli K; Bazvand F; Mirmohammadsadeghi A
    Orbit; 2017 Aug; 36(4):218-222. PubMed ID: 28627958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Congenital nasolacrymal duct obstruction: pulled monocanalicular intubation (Monoka) versus pushed monocanalicular intubation (Masterka)].
    Vernat-Tabarly O; Delmas J; Robert PY
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2020 Jun; 43(6):461-466. PubMed ID: 32360081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of the Masterka for complex nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children.
    Khatib L; Nazemzadeh M; Revere K; Katowitz WR; Katowitz JA
    J AAPOS; 2017 Oct; 21(5):380-383. PubMed ID: 28917994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the success rate between monocanalicular and bicanalicular intubations in incomplete complex congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Eshraghi B; Jamshidian-Tehrani M; Mirmohammadsadeghi A
    Orbit; 2017 Aug; 36(4):215-217. PubMed ID: 28627964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Monocanalicular silastic intubation for the initial correction of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Engel JM; Hichie-Schmidt C; Khammar A; Ostfeld BM; Vyas A; Ticho BH
    J AAPOS; 2007 Apr; 11(2):183-6. PubMed ID: 17307001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pushed monocanalicular intubation: an alternative stenting system for the management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructions.
    Fayet B; Katowitz WR; Racy E; Ruban JM; Katowitz JA
    J AAPOS; 2012 Oct; 16(5):468-72. PubMed ID: 23084387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular silicone intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Andalib D; Gharabaghi D; Nabai R; Abbaszadeh M
    J AAPOS; 2010 Oct; 14(5):421-4. PubMed ID: 21035069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparing of Treatment Results of Monocanalicular and Bicanalicular Intubation in Inborn Lacrimal Duct Obstruction].
    Červenka S; Matoušek P; Komínek P
    Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2016; 72(5):178-181. PubMed ID: 28224803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preloaded Monoka (Lacrijet) and congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: Initial results.
    Fayet B; Racy E; Ruban JM; Katowitz JA; Katowitz WR; Brémond-Gignac D
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2021 May; 44(5):670-679. PubMed ID: 33836913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Endoscopically Assisted Primary Probing and Bicanalicular Silicone Intubation for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children Aged 4 to 7 Years.
    Arici C; Mergen B; Ozan T; Batu Oto B
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2023; 60(2):101-107. PubMed ID: 35446188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pushed monocanalicular intubation. Pitfalls, deleterious side effects, and complications.
    Fayet B; Racy E; Ruban JM; Katowitz J
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2011 Nov; 34(9):597-607. PubMed ID: 21632147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "Pushed" stent intubation for treatment of complex congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Eshraghi B; Aghajani A; Kasaei A; Tabatabaei Z; Akbari M; Fard MA
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2014; 24(5):650-4. PubMed ID: 24729146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Monocanalicular silicone stent implantation in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction].
    Szalai I; Maneschg OA; Nagy ZZ
    Orv Hetil; 2020 Nov; 161(48):2037-2042. PubMed ID: 33249409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pushed monocanalicular intubation versus probing as a primary management for congenital nasolacrimal obstruction.
    Elsawaby EA; El Essawy RA; Abdelbaky SH; Ismail YM
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2016; 10():1487-93. PubMed ID: 27660407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A prospective, randomised comparison of probing versus bicanalicular silastic intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Al-Faky YH; Mousa A; Kalantan H; Al-Otaibi A; Alodan H; Alsuhaibani AH
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2015 Feb; 99(2):246-50. PubMed ID: 25185252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Outcome of monocanalicular intubation for complex congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: the role of age.
    Eshraghi B; Ghadimi H; Karami S; Nikdel M
    Rom J Ophthalmol; 2022; 66(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 35531458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: Comparison of Two Different Treatment Algorithms.
    Napier ML; Armstrong DJ; McLoone SF; McLoone EM
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2016 Sep; 53(5):285-91. PubMed ID: 27486727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. High incidence and recurrence of tympanostomy tube procedures in children who underwent nasolacrimal duct probe and intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Vicinanzo MG; Cooper KM; Gerber AL; Long J; McGwin G
    J AAPOS; 2023 Oct; 27(5):286.e1-286.e4. PubMed ID: 37734706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Success Rates of Conventional Versus Endoscope-Assisted Probing for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Children 12 Years and Younger.
    Galindo-Ferreiro A; Akaishi P; Cruz A; Khandekar R; Dossari S; Dufaileej M; Galvez-Ruiz A; Schellini S
    J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2016 Sep; 53(5):292-9. PubMed ID: 27383144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of Lacrijet monocanalicular intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.
    Hamed Azzam S; Hartstein M; Dolmetsch A; Mukari A
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2022 Nov; 32(6):3340-3345. PubMed ID: 35102761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.