486 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28629953)
1. 3D black blood MR angiography of the carotid arteries. A simple sequence for plaque hemorrhage and stenosis evaluation.
Sigovan M; Bidet C; Bros S; Boussel L; Mechtouff L; Robson PM; Fayad ZA; Millon A; Douek P
Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Oct; 42():95-100. PubMed ID: 28629953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improved carotid lumen delineation on non-contrast MR angiography using SNAP (Simultaneous Non-Contrast Angiography and Intraplaque Hemorrhage) imaging.
Liu H; Sun J; Hippe DS; Wu W; Chu B; Balu N; Hatsukami T; Yuan C
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Oct; 62():87-93. PubMed ID: 31247251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage (SNAP) imaging: Comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography for measuring carotid stenosis.
Shu H; Sun J; Hatsukami TS; Balu N; Hippe DS; Liu H; Kohler TR; Zhu W; Yuan C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Oct; 46(4):1045-1052. PubMed ID: 28165646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Contemporary carotid imaging: from degree of stenosis to plaque vulnerability.
Brinjikji W; Huston J; Rabinstein AA; Kim GM; Lerman A; Lanzino G
J Neurosurg; 2016 Jan; 124(1):27-42. PubMed ID: 26230478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison study between 3D T2-weighted SPACE and conventional 2D T2-weighted turbo spin echo in assessment of carotid plaque.
Lv P; Dai Y; Lin J; Zhang W; Liu H; Liu H; Tang X
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Mar; 33(3):395-400. PubMed ID: 27878405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Semiautomatic carotid intraplaque hemorrhage volume measurement using 3D carotid MRI.
Liu J; Sun J; Balu N; Ferguson MS; Wang J; Kerwin WS; Hippe DS; Wang A; Hatsukami TS; Yuan C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Oct; 50(4):1055-1062. PubMed ID: 30861249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hyperecho PROPELLER-MRI: Application to rapid high-resolution motion-insensitive T
Yoneyama M; Nakamura M; Obara M; Okuaki T; Sashi R; Sawano S; Tatsuno S; Van Cauteren M
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Feb; 45(2):515-524. PubMed ID: 27392068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cervical carotid plaque evaluation using 3D T1-weighted black-blood magnetic resonance imaging: Comparison of turbo field-echo and turbo spin-echo sequences.
Inoue K; Maeda M; Umino M; Takase S; Yamahata T; Sakuma H
Eur J Radiol; 2016 May; 85(5):1035-9. PubMed ID: 27130068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. T1-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Carotid Plaque Imaging: a Comparison between Conventional and Fast Spin-Echo Techniques.
Narumi S; Sasaki M; Miyazawa H; Natori T; Ito K; Ogasawara K; Kobayashi M; Hitomi J; Terayama Y
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis; 2017 Feb; 26(2):273-279. PubMed ID: 27838175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Histological validation of simultaneous non-contrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage imaging (SNAP) for characterizing carotid intraplaque hemorrhage.
Li D; Qiao H; Han Y; Han H; Yang D; Cao J; Xu H; Wang T; Wang Y; Shen J; Zhao X
Eur Radiol; 2021 May; 31(5):3106-3115. PubMed ID: 33052465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-enhanced MR angiography of renal arteries: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
Angeretti MG; Lumia D; Canì A; Barresi M; Nocchi Cardim L; Piacentino F; Maresca AM; Novario R; Genovese EA; Fugazzola C
Acta Radiol; 2013 Sep; 54(7):749-56. PubMed ID: 23550187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. MRI of the lumbar spine: comparison of 3D isotropic turbo spin-echo SPACE sequence versus conventional 2D sequences at 3.0 T.
Lee S; Jee WH; Jung JY; Lee SY; Ryu KS; Ha KY
Acta Radiol; 2015 Feb; 56(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 24553584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Quantitative evaluation of carotid atherosclerotic vulnerable plaques using in vivo T1 mapping cardiovascular magnetic resonaonce: validation by histology.
Qiao H; Li D; Cao J; Qi H; Han Y; Han H; Xu H; Wang T; Chen S; Chen H; Wang Y; Zhao X
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2020 May; 22(1):38. PubMed ID: 32434582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A fast screening protocol for carotid plaques imaging using 3D multi-contrast MRI without contrast agent.
Zhang N; Zhang L; Yang Q; Pei A; Tong X; Chung YC; Liu X
Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jun; 39():89-97. PubMed ID: 27989914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of mask images of contrast-enhanced MR angiography to detect carotid intraplaque hemorrhage in patients with moderate to severe symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis.
Kassem M; de Kam SS; van Velzen TJ; van der Geest R; Wagner B; Sokolska M; Pizzini FB; Nederkoorn PJ; Rolf Jäger H; Brown MM; van Oostenbrugge RJ; Bonati LH; Eline Kooi M
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Nov; 168():111145. PubMed ID: 37837923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiple reader comparison of 2D TOF, 3D TOF, and CEMRA in screening of the carotid bifurcations: Time to reconsider routine contrast use?
Ross JS; Buckner Petty SA; Brinjikji W; Hoxworth JM; Lehman VT; Middlebrooks EH; Patel AC; Wood CP
PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0237856. PubMed ID: 32877415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of image quality, diagnostic confidence and interobserver variability in contrast enhanced MR angiography and 2D time of flight angiography in evaluation of carotid stenosis.
Mitra D; Connolly D; Jenkins S; English P; Birchall D; Mandel C; Shrikanth K; Gregson B; Gholkar A
Br J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 79(939):201-7. PubMed ID: 16498031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multi-contrast atherosclerosis characterization (MATCH) of carotid plaque with a single 5-min scan: technical development and clinical feasibility.
Fan Z; Yu W; Xie Y; Dong L; Yang L; Wang Z; Conte AH; Bi X; An J; Zhang T; Laub G; Shah PK; Zhang Z; Li D
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2014 Jul; 16(1):53. PubMed ID: 25184808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identification of intraplaque hemorrhage on MR angiography images: a comparison of contrast-enhanced mask and time-of-flight techniques.
Qiao Y; Etesami M; Malhotra S; Astor BC; Virmani R; Kolodgie FD; Trout HH; Wasserman BA
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2011 Mar; 32(3):454-9. PubMed ID: 21233234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy and utility of three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in planning carotid stenting.
Timaran CH; Rosero EB; Valentine RJ; Modrall JG; Smith S; Clagett GP
J Vasc Surg; 2007 Aug; 46(2):257-63; discussion 263-4. PubMed ID: 17600659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
