These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28631530)

  • 21. Does preparation help to switch auditory attention between simultaneous voices: Effects of switch probability and prevalence of conflict.
    Strivens A; Koch I; Lavric A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 Apr; 86(3):750-767. PubMed ID: 38212478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Implicit perceptual learning of visual-auditory modality sequences.
    Koch I; Blotenberg I; Fedosejew V; Stephan DN
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Jan; 202():102979. PubMed ID: 31785577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Exploring individual differences in task switching.
    Li B; Li X; Stoet G; Lages M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Feb; 193():80-95. PubMed ID: 30599293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Spontaneous retrieval reveals right-ear advantage in prospective memory.
    Rothen N; Meier B
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Apr; 71(4):940-948. PubMed ID: 28854849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Modality and task switching interactions using bi-modal and bivalent stimuli.
    Sandhu R; Dyson BJ
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Jun; 82(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 23524240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Switching, plasticity, and prediction in a saccadic task-switch paradigm.
    Barton JJ; Greenzang C; Hefter R; Edelman J; Manoach DS
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 168(1-2):76-87. PubMed ID: 16096781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Task-switch costs subsequent to cue-only trials.
    Swainson R; Martin D; Prosser L
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Aug; 70(8):1453-1470. PubMed ID: 27174655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Central cross-talk in task switching: Evidence from manipulating input-output modality compatibility.
    Stephan DN; Koch I
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1075-81. PubMed ID: 20565224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Modality-specific effects on crosstalk in task switching: evidence from modality compatibility using bimodal stimulation.
    Stephan DN; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2016 Nov; 80(6):935-943. PubMed ID: 26377338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Components of task switching: a closer look at task switching and cue switching.
    Schmitz F; Voss A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Sep; 151():184-96. PubMed ID: 25004102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Different visual and auditory latencies affect cross-modal non-spatial repetition inhibition.
    Wu X; Wang A; Tang X; Zhang M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Sep; 200():102940. PubMed ID: 31665621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Cueing listeners to attend to a target talker progressively improves word report as the duration of the cue-target interval lengthens to 2,000 ms.
    Holmes E; Kitterick PT; Summerfield AQ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Aug; 80(6):1520-1538. PubMed ID: 29696570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Stimulus-category and response-repetition effects in task switching: an evaluation of four explanations.
    Druey MD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):125-46. PubMed ID: 23895451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Interaction of attention and acoustic factors in dichotic listening for fused words.
    McCulloch K; Lachner Bass N; Dial H; Hiscock M; Jansen B
    Laterality; 2017 Jul; 22(4):473-494. PubMed ID: 27535488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Can we prepare to attend to one of two simultaneous voices?
    Monsell S; Lavric A; Strivens A; Paul E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jul; 45(7):966-982. PubMed ID: 31021156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Control processes in voluntary and explicitly cued task switching.
    Masson ME; Carruthers S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 Oct; 67(10):1944-58. PubMed ID: 24443883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Neural Switch Asymmetry in Feature-Based Auditory Attention Tasks.
    McLaughlin SA; Larson E; Lee AKC
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2019 Apr; 20(2):205-215. PubMed ID: 30675674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A different outlook on time: visual and auditory month names elicit different mental vantage points for a time-space synaesthete.
    Jarick M; Dixon MJ; Stewart MT; Maxwell EC; Smilek D
    Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1217-28. PubMed ID: 19665700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cross-modal cueing in audiovisual spatial attention.
    Blurton SP; Greenlee MW; Gondan M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2356-76. PubMed ID: 26001381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Feature Integration and Task Switching: Diminished Switch Costs after Controlling for Stimulus, Response, and Cue Repetitions.
    Schmidt JR; Liefooghe B
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151188. PubMed ID: 26964102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.