These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28632099)

  • 1. How Working With a Helpful Versus Less Helpful Confederate Influences Joint-Action in a Pegboard Task.
    Scharoun S; Mintz A; Glazebrook CM; Roy E; Gonzalez D
    J Mot Behav; 2017; 49(6):619-628. PubMed ID: 28632099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Co-representation of others' task constraints in joint action.
    Schmitz L; Vesper C; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1480-1493. PubMed ID: 28368165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Entrainment and task co-representation effects for discrete and continuous action sequences.
    van der Wel RP; Fu E
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Dec; 22(6):1685-91. PubMed ID: 25911443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response selection during a joint action task.
    Ray M; Welsh TN
    J Mot Behav; 2011; 43(4):329-32. PubMed ID: 21774608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sense of agency in joint action: influence of human and computer co-actors.
    Obhi SS; Hall P
    Exp Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 211(3-4):663-70. PubMed ID: 21503652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of predictability in cooperative and competitive joint action.
    Glover S; Dixon P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Apr; 43(4):644-650. PubMed ID: 28345943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interplay between action and movement intentions during social interaction.
    Ondobaka S; de Lange FP; Newman-Norlund RD; Wiemers M; Bekkering H
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Jan; 23(1):30-5. PubMed ID: 22157675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Avoiding Accidents at the Champagne Reception.
    Pezzulo G; Iodice P; Donnarumma F; Dindo H; Knoblich G
    Psychol Sci; 2017 Mar; 28(3):338-345. PubMed ID: 28103140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Social categorization and cooperation in motor joint action: evidence for a joint end-state comfort.
    Dötsch D; Schubö A
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Aug; 233(8):2323-34. PubMed ID: 25963752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Index of difficulty and side of space are accommodated during the selection and planning of a joint action.
    Ray M; de Grosbois J; Welsh TN
    Hum Mov Sci; 2017 Aug; 54():197-209. PubMed ID: 28527422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Similarity of actions depends on the functionality of previously observed actions.
    Naber M; Eijgermans W; Herman AS; Bergman A; Hommel B
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 May; 42(5):719-29. PubMed ID: 26618624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Motor control hierarchy in joint action that involves bimanual force production.
    Masumoto J; Inui N
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Jun; 113(10):3736-43. PubMed ID: 25904710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. How does a partner's motor variability affect joint action?
    Sabu S; Curioni A; Vesper C; Sebanz N; Knoblich G
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(10):e0241417. PubMed ID: 33119675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Autistic traits affect interpersonal motor coordination by modulating strategic use of role-based behavior.
    Curioni A; Minio-Paluello I; Sacheli LM; Candidi M; Aglioti SM
    Mol Autism; 2017; 8():23. PubMed ID: 28616126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The phenomenology of controlling a moving object with another person.
    Dewey JA; Pacherie E; Knoblich G
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):383-97. PubMed ID: 24879353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Motion coordination affects movement parameters in a joint pick-and-place task.
    Vesper C; Soutschek A; Schubo A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Dec; 62(12):2418-32. PubMed ID: 19499488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Joint action goals reduce visuomotor interference effects from a partner's incongruent actions.
    Clarke S; McEllin L; Francová A; Székely M; Butterfill SA; Michael J
    Sci Rep; 2019 Oct; 9(1):15414. PubMed ID: 31659223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Intra- and interpersonal movement coordination in jointly moving a rocking board.
    Bosga J; Meulenbroek RG; Cuijpers RH
    Motor Control; 2010 Oct; 14(4):440-59. PubMed ID: 21051787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Observing end-state comfort favorable actions does not modulate action plan recall.
    Seegelke C
    Front Psychol; 2015; 6():45. PubMed ID: 25688223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attention allocation and task representation during joint action planning.
    Kourtis D; Knoblich G; Woźniak M; Sebanz N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2014 Oct; 26(10):2275-86. PubMed ID: 24702448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.