These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2863220)
1. Working ability and exercise tolerance during treatment of a mild hypertension. I. Comparison between a beta-adreno-receptor blocking drug and a calcium antagonist. Lange Andersen K; Piatkowski W; Green KA; Ottmann W Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 1985; 56(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 2863220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Working ability and exercise tolerance during treatment of mild hypertension. II. A comparison between atenolol and prazosin medication. Lange Andersen K; Ottmann W; Piatkowski W; Green KA Int Arch Occup Environ Health; 1985; 56(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 3897071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Atenolol/nifedipine combination: efficacy and tolerability of low dose synergistic bitherapy in the treatment of arterial hypertension]. Krivitzky A; Nguyen G; Gaudouen Y; Legrand M; Cohen R Drugs; 1998; 56 Suppl 2():31-43. PubMed ID: 9813740 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Multicenter placebo-controlled comparison of amlodipine and atenolol in mild to moderate hypertension. de Bruijn B; Cocco G; Tyler HM J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 1988; 12 Suppl 7():S107-9. PubMed ID: 2467117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Atenolol plus nifedipine for mild to moderate systemic hypertension after fixed doses of either agent alone. Daniels AR; Opie LH Am J Cardiol; 1986 Apr; 57(11):965-70. PubMed ID: 3515899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nitrendipine and atenolol: comparison and combination in the treatment of arterial hypertension. de Divitiis O; Petitto M; Di Somma S; Galderisi M; Villari B; Santomauro M; Fazio S Arzneimittelforschung; 1985; 35(4):727-9. PubMed ID: 3160356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized placebo-controlled comparison of amlodipine and atenolol in mild to moderate systemic hypertension. Frishman WH; Brobyn R; Brown RD; Johnson BF; Reeves RL; Wombolt DG J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 1988; 12 Suppl 7():S103-6. PubMed ID: 2467116 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Efficacy and tolerability of atenolol, nifedipine and their combination in the management of hypertension. Stanley NN; Thirkettle JL; Varma MP; Larkin H; Heath ID Drugs; 1988; 35 Suppl 4():29-35. PubMed ID: 3288468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Total Ischaemic Burden European Trial (TIBET). Effects of atenolol, nifedipine SR and their combination on the exercise test and the total ischaemic burden in 608 patients with stable angina. The TIBET Study Group. Fox KM; Mulcahy D; Findlay I; Ford I; Dargie HJ Eur Heart J; 1996 Jan; 17(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 8682138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The efficacy and tolerability of atenolol, nifedipine, and their combination in the management of hypertension. Stanley NN; Thirkettle JL; Varma MP; Larkin H; Heath ID Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 1988; 34(6):543-8. PubMed ID: 3049118 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acute and long-term effects of nitrendipine on resting and exercise hemodynamics in essential hypertension. Nannan ME; Melin JA; Vanbutsele RJ; Lavenne F; Detry JM J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 1984; 6 Suppl 7():S1043-8. PubMed ID: 6085364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monotherapy with nifedipine GITS compared with atenolol in stable angina pectoris. The Working Group on Cardiovascular Research (WCN). de Vries RJ; Dunselman PH Br J Clin Pract Suppl; 1997 Apr; 88():6-9. PubMed ID: 9519501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of nisoldipine and atenolol in the treatment of essential hypertension. Takahashi H; Fukuyama M; Yoneda S; Okabayashi H; Yoshimura M Arzneimittelforschung; 1989 Mar; 39(3):379-82. PubMed ID: 2667523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Beta receptor block versus calcium antagonism. A comparative study of bopindolol and nifedipine with special regard to quality of life]. Welzel D; Bräutigam M Arzneimittelforschung; 1989 Apr; 39(4):499-503. PubMed ID: 2568838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Antihypertensive effects on blood pressure at rest and during exercise of calcium antagonists, beta-receptor blockers, and their combination in hypertensive patients. Franz IW; Wiewel D J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 1984; 6 Suppl 7():S1037-42. PubMed ID: 6085363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Nifedipine and atenolol singly and combined for treatment of essential hypertension: comparative multicentre study in general practice in the United Kingdom. Nifedipine-Atenolol Study Review Committee. Nifedipine-Atenolol Study Review Committee Br Med J (Clin Res Ed); 1988 Feb; 296(6620):468-72. PubMed ID: 2894883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative study of lacidipine and nifedipine SR in the treatment of hypertension: an Italian multicenter study. The Northern Italian Study Group of Lacidipine in Hypertension. Leonetti G J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 1991; 17 Suppl 4():S31-4. PubMed ID: 1726003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Structure and function of small arteries of essential hypertensive patients following chronic treatment with once-a-day nifedipine. Schiffrin EL Cardiology; 1997; 88 Suppl 3():20-6. PubMed ID: 9397289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Atenolol and sustained release nifedipine alone and in combination in hypertension. A randomised, double-blind, crossover study. Anderton JL; Vallance BD; Stanley NN; Crowe PF; Mittra B; Perks WH Drugs; 1988; 35 Suppl 4():22-6. PubMed ID: 3288467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the effects of mibefradil and atenolol on regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients. Höglund C; Cifkova R; Mimran A; Tenczer J; Watt A; Wilkins MR; Lindberg E Cardiology; 1998 May; 89(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 9643273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]