These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28632643)

  • 1. Early Impact of Postoperative Bracing on Pain and Quality of Life After Posterior Instrumented Fusion for Lumbar Degenerative Conditions: A Randomized Trial.
    Soliman HAG; Barchi S; Parent S; Maurais G; Jodoin A; Mac-Thiong JM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Feb; 43(3):155-160. PubMed ID: 28632643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
    Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
    Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Determination of minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after extension of fusion for adjacent-segment disease.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jan; 16(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 21962034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bracing Following Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion is not Necessary for Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Spine Disease: A Prospective, Randomized Trial.
    Yao YC; Lin HH; Chang MC
    Clin Spine Surg; 2018 Nov; 31(9):E441-E445. PubMed ID: 30024447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prediction based on preoperative opioid use of clinical outcomes after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions.
    Villavicencio AT; Nelson EL; Kantha V; Burneikiene S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):144-149. PubMed ID: 27689425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative analysis of 3 surgical strategies for adult spinal deformity with mild to moderate sagittal imbalance.
    Bae J; Theologis AA; Strom R; Tay B; Burch S; Berven S; Mummaneni PV; Chou D; Ames CP; Deviren V
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Jan; 28(1):40-49. PubMed ID: 29087808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Clinical Outcomes of Posterolateral Fusion vs. Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Instability.
    Farrokhi MR; Yadollahikhales G; Gholami M; Mousavi SR; Mesbahi AR; Asadi-Pooya AA
    Pain Physician; 2018 Jul; 21(4):383-406. PubMed ID: 30045595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiographic and clinical outcomes following combined lateral lumbar interbody fusion and posterior segmental stabilization in patients with adult degenerative scoliosis.
    Tempel ZJ; Gandhoke GS; Bonfield CM; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS
    Neurosurg Focus; 2014 May; 36(5):E11. PubMed ID: 24785476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation of preoperative depression and somatic perception scales with postoperative disability and quality of life after lumbar discectomy.
    Chaichana KL; Mukherjee D; Adogwa O; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 Feb; 14(2):261-7. PubMed ID: 21214315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Utility of minimum clinically important difference in assessing pain, disability, and health state after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Paul AR; Anderson WN; Aaronson O; Cheng JS; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2011 May; 14(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 21332281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Minimum clinically important difference in pain, disability, and quality of life after neural decompression and fusion for same-level recurrent lumbar stenosis: understanding clinical versus statistical significance.
    Parker SL; Mendenhall SK; Shau DN; Adogwa O; Anderson WN; Devin CJ; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 May; 16(5):471-8. PubMed ID: 22324801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 14: brace therapy as an adjunct to or substitute for lumbar fusion.
    Dailey AT; Ghogawala Z; Choudhri TF; Watters WC; Resnick DK; Sharan A; Eck JC; Mummaneni PV; Wang JC; Groff MW; Dhall SS; Kaiser MG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jul; 21(1):91-101. PubMed ID: 24980591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How does back muscle strength change after posterior lumbar interbody fusion?
    Lee CS; Kang KC; Chung SS; Park WH; Shin WJ; Seo YG
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 27740397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical and radiological outcomes after decompression and posterior fusion in patients with degenerative scoliosis.
    Farrokhi MR; Jamali M; Gholami M; Farrokhi F; Hosseini K
    Br J Neurosurg; 2017 Oct; 31(5):514-525. PubMed ID: 28420247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients.
    Theologis AA; Mundis GM; Nguyen S; Okonkwo DO; Mummaneni PV; Smith JS; Shaffrey CI; Fessler R; Bess S; Schwab F; Diebo BG; Burton D; Hart R; Deviren V; Ames C;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Feb; 26(2):208-219. PubMed ID: 27767682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Does clinical improvement of symptomatic degenerative lumbar disease impact obesity?
    Joseph JR; Farooqui Z; Smith BW; Kahn EN; Liu X; La Marca F; Park P
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Jun; 26(6):705-708. PubMed ID: 28362212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differentiating minimum clinically important difference for primary and revision lumbar fusion surgeries.
    Carreon LY; Bratcher KR; Canan CE; Burke LO; Djurasovic M; Glassman SD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jan; 18(1):102-6. PubMed ID: 23157276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective, randomised controlled trial of femoral ring allograft versus a titanium cage in circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with minimum 2-year clinical results.
    McKenna PJ; Freeman BJ; Mulholland RC; Grevitt MP; Webb JK; Mehdian SH
    Eur Spine J; 2005 Oct; 14(8):727-37. PubMed ID: 16163514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Objective functional assessment using the "Timed Up and Go" test in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.
    Stienen MN; Maldaner N; Joswig H; Corniola MV; Bellut D; Prömmel P; Regli L; Weyerbrock A; Schaller K; Gautschi OP
    Neurosurg Focus; 2019 May; 46(5):E4. PubMed ID: 31042663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.