These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28632879)
1. Reliability and Agreement Between Metrics of Cone Spacing in Adaptive Optics Images of the Human Retinal Photoreceptor Mosaic. Giannini D; Lombardo G; Mariotti L; Devaney N; Serrao S; Lombardo M Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 Jun; 58(7):3127-3137. PubMed ID: 28632879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variation in rod and cone density from the fovea to the mid-periphery in healthy human retinas using adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy. Wells-Gray EM; Choi SS; Bries A; Doble N Eye (Lond); 2016 Aug; 30(8):1135-43. PubMed ID: 27229708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluating Descriptive Metrics of the Human Cone Mosaic. Cooper RF; Wilk MA; Tarima S; Carroll J Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Jun; 57(7):2992-3001. PubMed ID: 27273598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. High-resolution imaging of photoreceptors in healthy human eyes using an adaptive optics retinal camera. Tumahai P; Moureaux C; Meillat M; Debellemanière G; Flores M; Delbosc B; Saleh M Eye (Lond); 2018 Nov; 32(11):1723-1730. PubMed ID: 29993035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The organization of the cone photoreceptor mosaic measured in the living human retina. Sawides L; de Castro A; Burns SA Vision Res; 2017 Mar; 132():34-44. PubMed ID: 27353225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cone Photoreceptor Cell Segmentation and Diameter Measurement on Adaptive Optics Images Using Circularly Constrained Active Contour Model. Liu J; Jung H; Dubra A; Tam J Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2018 Sep; 59(11):4639-4652. PubMed ID: 30372733 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Cone Mosaic Metrics From Images Acquired With the SPECTRALIS High Magnification Module and Adaptive Optics Scanning Light Ophthalmoscopy. Wynne N; Heitkotter H; Woertz EN; Cooper RF; Carroll J Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2022 May; 11(5):19. PubMed ID: 35583887 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated Photoreceptor Cell Identification on Nonconfocal Adaptive Optics Images Using Multiscale Circular Voting. Liu J; Jung H; Dubra A; Tam J Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2017 Sep; 58(11):4477-4489. PubMed ID: 28873173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection of airbag impact-induced cone photoreceptor damage by adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy: a case report. Kaizu Y; Nakao S; Yamaguchi M; Murakami Y; Salehi-Had H; Ishibashi T BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Jul; 16():99. PubMed ID: 27391597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High Reliability of Cone Cell Measurements With Adaptive Optics Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy in a Simulated Real-Life Clinical Setting. Davoudi S; Sevgi DD; Yasa C; Laíns I; Ebrahimiadib N; Roohipoor R; Papavasilieou E; Comander J; Sobrin L Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina; 2018 Apr; 49(4):228-235. PubMed ID: 29664978 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability of cone counts using an adaptive optics retinal camera. Bidaut Garnier M; Flores M; Debellemanière G; Puyraveau M; Tumahai P; Meillat M; Schwartz C; Montard M; Delbosc B; Saleh M Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 42(9):833-40. PubMed ID: 24800991 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Repeatability of in vivo parafoveal cone density and spacing measurements. Garrioch R; Langlo C; Dubis AM; Cooper RF; Dubra A; Carroll J Optom Vis Sci; 2012 May; 89(5):632-43. PubMed ID: 22504330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Noninvasive imaging of the thirteen-lined ground squirrel photoreceptor mosaic. Sajdak B; Sulai YN; Langlo CS; Luna G; Fisher SK; Merriman DK; Dubra A Vis Neurosci; 2016; 33():e003. PubMed ID: 26923645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]