BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

699 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28633004)

  • 1. Field evaluations of newly available "interference-free" monitors for nitrogen dioxide and ozone at near-road and conventional National Ambient Air Quality Standards compliance sites.
    Leston AR; Ollison WM
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Nov; 67(11):1240-1248. PubMed ID: 28633004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Field testing of new-technology ambient air ozone monitors.
    Ollison WM; Crow W; Spicer CW
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2013 Jul; 63(7):855-63. PubMed ID: 23926854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of spatiotemporal prediction models of daily exposure of individuals to ambient nitrogen dioxide and ozone in Montreal, Canada.
    Buteau S; Hatzopoulou M; Crouse DL; Smargiassi A; Burnett RT; Logan T; Cavellin LD; Goldberg MS
    Environ Res; 2017 Jul; 156():201-230. PubMed ID: 28359040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Field intercomparison of continuous ambient FRM and FEM NO
    Landis MS; Edgerton ES
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2024 Jan; 74(1):11-24. PubMed ID: 37934868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Assessment of nitrogen oxides and ground-level ozone behavior in a dense air quality station network: Case study in the Lesser Antilles Arc.
    Plocoste T; Dorville JF; Monjoly S; Jacoby-Koaly S; André M
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2018 Dec; 68(12):1278-1300. PubMed ID: 29708862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. NO
    Allen C; Carrico CM; Gomez SL; Andersen PC; Turnipseed AA; Williford CJ; Birks JW; Salisbury D; Carrion R; Gates D; Macias F; Rahn T; Aiken AC; Dubey MK
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2018 Nov; 68(11):1175-1189. PubMed ID: 29889623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Temporal characterization and regional contribution to O3 and NOx at an urban and a suburban site in Nanjing, China.
    Xie M; Zhu K; Wang T; Chen P; Han Y; Li S; Zhuang B; Shu L
    Sci Total Environ; 2016 May; 551-552():533-45. PubMed ID: 26896582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of tropospheric ozone at an industrial site of Chennai megacity.
    Mohan S; Saranya P
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2019 Sep; 69(9):1079-1095. PubMed ID: 30973317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Vertical profiles of O
    Chen L; Pang X; Li J; Xing B; An T; Yuan K; Dai S; Wu Z; Wang S; Wang Q; Mao Y; Chen J
    Sci Total Environ; 2022 Nov; 845():157113. PubMed ID: 35787910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.
    Kelly F; Anderson HR; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Barratt B; Beevers S; Derwent D; Green D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Apr; (155):5-71. PubMed ID: 21830496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. PRCI ambient NO
    Panek JA; McCarthy JM; Huth AZ; Krol AJ; Nowak C
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2020 May; 70(5):504-521. PubMed ID: 32186474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Analysis of the relationship between NO, NO2 and O3 concentrations in Beijing].
    An JL; Wang YS; Li X; Sun Y; Shen SH; Shi LQ
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2007 Apr; 28(4):706-11. PubMed ID: 17639925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of ozone, nitrogen dioxide, and carbon monoxide at nine sites in Saudi Arabia during 2007.
    Butenhoff CL; Khalil MA; Porter WC; Al-Sahafi MS; Almazroui M; Al-Khalaf A
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 Jul; 65(7):871-86. PubMed ID: 26079561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of NO2 predictions by the plume volume molar ratio method (PVMRM) and ozone limiting method (OLM) in AERMOD using new field observations.
    Hendrick EM; Tino VR; Hanna SR; Egan BA
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2013 Jul; 63(7):844-54. PubMed ID: 23926853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The spatial variation of O
    Hagenbjörk A; Malmqvist E; Mattisson K; Sommar NJ; Modig L
    Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Apr; 189(4):161. PubMed ID: 28290139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Temporal and spatial distribution of ozone concentration by aircraft sounding over Beijing].
    Chen PF; Zhang Q; Quan JN; Gao Y; Huang MY
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2012 Dec; 33(12):4141-50. PubMed ID: 23379135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A measurement of total reactive nitrogen, NOy, together with NO₂, NO, and O₃ via cavity ring-down spectroscopy.
    Wild RJ; Edwards PM; Dubé WP; Baumann K; Edgerton ES; Quinn PK; Roberts JM; Rollins AW; Veres PR; Warneke C; Williams EJ; Yuan B; Brown SS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Aug; 48(16):9609-15. PubMed ID: 25019919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in ozone photochemical characteristics between the megacity Nanjing and its suburban surroundings, Yangtze River Delta, China.
    An J; Zou J; Wang J; Lin X; Zhu B
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2015 Dec; 22(24):19607-17. PubMed ID: 26272292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Spatial and temporal analysis of ground level ozone and nitrogen dioxide concentration across the twin cities of Pakistan.
    Ahmad SS; Aziz N
    Environ Monit Assess; 2013 Apr; 185(4):3133-47. PubMed ID: 22821323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of the ozone-nitrogen oxide-volatile organic compound sensitivity of Mexico City through an indicator-based approach: measurements and numerical simulations comparison.
    Torres-Jardón R; García-Reynoso JA; Jazcilevich A; Ruiz-Suárez LG; Keener TC
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2009 Oct; 59(10):1155-72. PubMed ID: 19842324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 35.