BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28633359)

  • 1. Does long-term intraoral service affect the mechanical properties and elemental composition of multistranded wires of lingual fixed retainers?
    Zinelis S; Pandis N; Al Jabbari YS; Eliades G; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2018 Apr; 40(2):126-131. PubMed ID: 28633359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mechanical properties of orthodontic wires derived by instrumented indentation testing (IIT) according to ISO 14577.
    Zinelis S; Al Jabbari YS; Gaintantzopoulou M; Eliades G; Eliades T
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():19. PubMed ID: 26089176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative analysis of the mechanical properties of fiber and stainless steel multistranded wires used for lingual fixed retention.
    Annousaki O; Zinelis S; Eliades G; Eliades T
    Dent Mater; 2017 May; 33(5):e205-e211. PubMed ID: 28174007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tensile test and interface retention forces between wires and composites in lingual fixed retainers.
    Paolone MG; Kaitsas R; Obach P; Kaitsas V; Benedicenti S; Sorrenti E; Barberis F
    Int Orthod; 2015 Jun; 13(2):210-220. PubMed ID: 26003122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nickel release from orthodontic retention wires-the action of mechanical loading and pH.
    Milheiro A; Kleverlaan C; Muris J; Feilzer A; Pallav P
    Dent Mater; 2012 May; 28(5):548-53. PubMed ID: 22260951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Synergistic effect of wire bending and salivary pH on surface properties and mechanical properties of orthodontic stainless steel archwires.
    Hobbelink MG; He Y; Xu J; Xie H; Stoll R; Ye Q
    Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():37. PubMed ID: 26501207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Elemental composition, corrosion resistance and mechanical properties of computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing fixed retainers versus conventional fixed retainers.
    Namura Y; Pullisaar H; Holm HV; Syverud M; Mulic A; Vandevska-Radunovic V
    J Oral Sci; 2024 Apr; 66(2):107-110. PubMed ID: 38403676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparison of the Compositional, Microstructural, and Mechanical Characteristics of Ni-Free and Conventional Stainless Steel Orthodontic Wires.
    Brüngger D; Koutsoukis T; S Al Jabbari Y; Hersberger-Zurfluh M; Zinelis S; Eliades T
    Materials (Basel); 2019 Oct; 12(20):. PubMed ID: 31635055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Elemental, microstructural, and mechanical characterization of high gold orthodontic brackets after intraoral aging.
    Hersche S; Sifakakis I; Zinelis S; Eliades T
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2017 Feb; 62(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 27049606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Elastic flexural properties of multistranded stainless steel versus conventional nickel titanium archwires.
    Rucker BK; Kusy RP
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Aug; 72(4):302-9. PubMed ID: 12169029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Structure, composition, and mechanical properties of Australian orthodontic wires.
    Pelsue BM; Zinelis S; Bradley TG; Berzins DW; Eliades T; Eliades G
    Angle Orthod; 2009 Jan; 79(1):97-101. PubMed ID: 19123699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of three brands of round stainless steel wires used in the Begg and tip-edge techniques.
    Birkenkamp S; Pancherz H
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 16429876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical comparison between Multi-Stranded Wires and Single strand Ribbon wires used for lingual fixed retainers.
    Arash V; Teimoorian M; Farajzadeh Jalali Y; Sheikhzadeh S
    Prog Orthod; 2020 Jun; 21(1):22. PubMed ID: 32596755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retrieval analysis of lingual fixed retainer adhesives.
    Gugger J; Pandis N; Zinelis S; Patcas R; Eliades G; Eliades T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Oct; 150(4):575-584. PubMed ID: 27692414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Martensitic transformation of austenitic stainless steel orthodontic wires during intraoral exposure.
    Izquierdo PP; de Biasi RS; Elias CN; Nojima LI
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Dec; 138(6):714.e1-5; discussion 714-5. PubMed ID: 21130328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro comparison of the torsional load transfer of various commercially available stainless-steel wires used for fixed retainers in orthodontics.
    Engeler OG; Dalstra M; Arnold DT; Steineck M; Verna C
    J Orthod; 2021 Jun; 48(2):118-126. PubMed ID: 33231109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In-vitro evaluation of the material characteristics of stainless steel and beta-titanium orthodontic wires.
    Verstrynge A; Van Humbeeck J; Willems G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Oct; 130(4):460-70. PubMed ID: 17045145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A study of the mechanical properties of as-received and intraorally exposed single-crystal and polycrystalline orthodontic ceramic brackets.
    Alexopoulou E; Polychronis G; Konstantonis D; Sifakakis I; Zinelis S; Eliades T
    Eur J Orthod; 2020 Jan; 42(1):72-77. PubMed ID: 31009950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. In-vitro assessment of the forces generated by lingual fixed retainers.
    Sifakakis I; Pandis N; Eliades T; Makou M; Katsaros C; Bourauel C
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jan; 139(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 21195275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Physical, mechanical, and flexural properties of 3 orthodontic wires: an in-vitro study.
    Juvvadi SR; Kailasam V; Padmanabhan S; Chitharanjan AB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):623-30. PubMed ID: 21055604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.