These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 286338)

  • 1. Evidence for selection by male mating success in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Anderson WW; Levine L; Olvera O; Powell JR; de la Rosa ME; Salceda VM; Gaso MI; Guzmán J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1979 Mar; 76(3):1519-23. PubMed ID: 286338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rare male mating advantage in a natural population of Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Salceda VM; Anderson WW
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1988 Dec; 85(24):9870-4. PubMed ID: 3200863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Relative effects of female fecundity and male mating success on fertility selection in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Brockett MM; Alavi H; Anderson WW
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1996 Apr; 93(7):3080-2. PubMed ID: 8610171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mutual interest between the sexes and reproductive success in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Gowaty PA; Steinichen R; Anderson WW
    Evolution; 2002 Dec; 56(12):2537-40. PubMed ID: 12583593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. SELECTION AND THE "SEX-RATIO" POLYMORPHISM IN NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA.
    Beckenbach AT
    Evolution; 1996 Apr; 50(2):787-794. PubMed ID: 28568936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequency-dependent selection at the PGM-1 locus of Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Snyder TP; Ayala FJ
    Genetics; 1979 Jul; 92(3):995-1003. PubMed ID: 161241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of larval crowding on adult mating behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Ribó G; Ocaña J; Prevosti A
    Heredity (Edinb); 1989 Oct; 63 ( Pt 2)():195-202. PubMed ID: 2509403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. No evidence for learned mating discrimination in male Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Kandul NP; Wright KM; Kandul EV; Noor MA
    BMC Evol Biol; 2006 Jul; 6():54. PubMed ID: 16824212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lack of correlation between mating activity and EST-1 polymorphism in three natural and laboratory populations of Drosophila bipectinata.
    Naseerulla MK; Hegde SN
    Indian J Exp Biol; 1993 Mar; 31(3):215-8. PubMed ID: 8500836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Divergent environments and population bottlenecks fail to generate premating isolation in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Rundle HD
    Evolution; 2003 Nov; 57(11):2557-65. PubMed ID: 14686531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Selection by fertility in Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Anderson WW; Watanabe TK
    Genetics; 1974 Jul; 77(3):559-64. PubMed ID: 4426507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Polymorphisms in a desaturase 2 ortholog associate with cuticular hydrocarbon and male mating success variation in a natural population of Drosophila serrata.
    Ivory-Church J; Frentiu FD; Chenoweth SF
    J Evol Biol; 2015 Sep; 28(9):1600-9. PubMed ID: 26104145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sexual isolation between North American and Bogota strains of Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Kim YK; Ruiz-García M; Alvarez D; Phillips DR; Anderson WW
    Behav Genet; 2012 May; 42(3):472-82. PubMed ID: 22065259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parallelism between male mating propensity and chromosome arrangement frequency in natural populations of Drosophila ananassae.
    Singh BN; Chatterjee S
    Heredity (Edinb); 1988 Apr; 60 ( Pt 2)():269-72. PubMed ID: 3366629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A test for rare male mating advantage at an "enzyme locus" in Drosophila.
    Ehrman L; Anderson W; Blatte L
    Behav Genet; 1977 Nov; 7(6):427-32. PubMed ID: 603476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Male size, developmental stability, and mating success in natural populations of three Drosophila species.
    Markow TA; Ricker JP
    Heredity (Edinb); 1992 Aug; 69 ( Pt 2)():122-7. PubMed ID: 1526852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selection in natural and experimental populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Anderson WW
    Genome; 1989; 31(1):239-45. PubMed ID: 2687095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selection in heterogeneous environments maintains the gene arrangement polymorphism of Drosophila pseudoobscura.
    Schaeffer SW
    Evolution; 2008 Dec; 62(12):3082-99. PubMed ID: 18764919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Premating isolation is determined by larval rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. VIII. Mating success mediated by epicuticular hydrocarbons within and between isolated populations.
    Etges WJ; Tripodi AD
    J Evol Biol; 2008 Nov; 21(6):1641-52. PubMed ID: 18713239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Fitness of allozyme variants in Drosophila pseudoobscura. I. Selection at the PGM-1 and Me-2 loci.
    Marinković D; Ayala FJ
    Genetics; 1975 Jan; 79(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 1126623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.