These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28633802)

  • 1. Assumptions of Statistical Tests: What Lies Beneath.
    Jupiter DC
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2017; 56(4):910-913. PubMed ID: 28633802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A heteroscedastic generalized linear model with a non-normal speed factor for responses and response times.
    Molenaar D; Bolsinova M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 May; 70(2):297-316. PubMed ID: 28474768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Residual analysis for linear mixed models.
    Nobre JS; da Motta Singer J
    Biom J; 2007 Dec; 49(6):863-75. PubMed ID: 17638292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding and checking the assumptions of linear regression: a primer for medical researchers.
    Casson RJ; Farmer LD
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2014 Aug; 42(6):590-6. PubMed ID: 24801277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Statistics in review Part I: graphics, data summary and linear models.
    Moran JL; Solomon PJ
    Crit Care Resusc; 2007 Mar; 9(1):81-90. PubMed ID: 17352672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical analysis of pharmacokinetic data with special applications to bioequivalence studies.
    Powers J; Powers T
    Ann Rech Vet; 1990; 21 Suppl 1():87S-92S. PubMed ID: 2080852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Introduction to statistical modelling: linear regression.
    Lunt M
    Rheumatology (Oxford); 2015 Jul; 54(7):1137-40. PubMed ID: 23594471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Testing for interaction in two-way random and mixed effects models: the fully nonparametric approach.
    Gaugler T; Akritas MG
    Biometrics; 2011 Dec; 67(4):1314-20. PubMed ID: 21401567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robust statistical methods: A primer for clinical psychology and experimental psychopathology researchers.
    Field AP; Wilcox RR
    Behav Res Ther; 2017 Nov; 98():19-38. PubMed ID: 28577757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modern robust statistical methods: an easy way to maximize the accuracy and power of your research.
    Erceg-Hurn DM; Mirosevich VM
    Am Psychol; 2008 Oct; 63(7):591-601. PubMed ID: 18855490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Increasing efficiency and precision of data analysis: multivariate vs. univariate statistical techniques.
    Goodwin LD
    Nurs Res; 1984; 33(4):247-9. PubMed ID: 6564529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: checking assumptions concerning regression residuals.
    Barker LE; Shaw KM
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2015 Sep; 102(3):533-9. PubMed ID: 26201816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direction of effects in mediation analysis.
    Wiedermann W; von Eye A
    Psychol Methods; 2015 Jun; 20(2):221-44. PubMed ID: 25751515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Testing for negligible interaction: A coherent and robust approach.
    Cribbie RA; Ragoonanan C; Counsell A
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 May; 69(2):159-74. PubMed ID: 27022015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Non-normality and transformations of random fields, with an application to voxel-based morphometry.
    Viviani R; Beschoner P; Ehrhard K; Schmitz B; Thöne J
    Neuroimage; 2007 Mar; 35(1):121-30. PubMed ID: 17222566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Analyzing Proportion Scores as Outcomes for Prevention Trials: a Statistical Primer.
    Chen K; Cheng Y; Berkout O; Lindhiem O
    Prev Sci; 2017 Apr; 18(3):312-321. PubMed ID: 26960687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Linearity evaluation of analytical methods that count particles.
    Magari RT; Rodriguez L
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2004 Feb; 42(2):215-21. PubMed ID: 15061364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing and modelling non-normality within the one-factor model.
    Molenaar D; Dolan CV; Verhelst ND
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2010 May; 63(Pt 2):293-317. PubMed ID: 19796474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Heteroscedasticity as a Basis of Direction Dependence in Reversible Linear Regression Models.
    Wiedermann W; Artner R; von Eye A
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2017; 52(2):222-241. PubMed ID: 28128999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technical note: Analysis of ordinal outcomes from carcass data in beef cattle research.
    Osterstock JB; MacDonald JC; Boggess MM; Brown MS
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Oct; 88(10):3384-9. PubMed ID: 20525937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.