143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28633929)
1. Biomechanical evaluation of different osteosynthesis methods after mandibular sagittal split osteotomy in major advancements.
Klein GBG; Mendes GCB; Ribeiro Junior PD; Viswanath A; Papageorge M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Nov; 46(11):1387-1393. PubMed ID: 28633929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of the use of conventional and locking miniplate/screw systems for sagittal split ramus osteotomy.
Ribeiro-Junior PD; Magro-Filho O; Shastri KA; Papageorge MB
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Apr; 68(4):724-30. PubMed ID: 19962812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mechanical evaluation of six techniques for stable fixation of the sagittal split osteotomy after counterclockwise mandibular advancement.
De Oliveira LB; Reis JM; Spin-Neto R; Gabrielli MA; Oguz Y; Pereira-Filho VA
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 54(5):573-8. PubMed ID: 27068853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative evaluation of different fixation techniques of the sagittal split ramus osteotomy in 10 mm advancements: Mechanical testing and screw insertion torque.
Sigua-Rodriguez EA; de Medeiros RC; Goulart DR; Bomfim-Azevedo VL; Olate S; de Albergaria-Barbosa JR
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2082-2087. PubMed ID: 30322777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In vitro biomechanical comparison of six different fixation methods following 5-mm sagittal split advancement osteotomies.
Oguz Y; Watanabe ER; Reis JM; Spin-Neto R; Gabrielli MA; Pereira-Filho VA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Aug; 44(8):984-8. PubMed ID: 25840861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical evaluation of hybrid fixation method of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement.
Gursoytrak B; Unsal N; Demetoglu U; Simsek HO; Saglam H; Dolanmaz D
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Dec; 46(12):2063-2068. PubMed ID: 30446327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. In vitro study of a modified sagittal split osteotomy fixation technique of the mandible: a mechanical test.
Sonego CL; Scheffer MAR; Chagas Júnior OL; Vetromilla BM; Fernandes LP; Ozkomur A; Silva Júnior AN; Miguens Júnior SAQ; Hernandez PAG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Oct; 47(10):1330-1335. PubMed ID: 29655819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stability of fixation methods in large mandibular advancements after sagittal split ramus osteotomy: an in vitro biomechanical study.
Kuik K; Ho JPTF; de Ruiter MHT; Klop C; Kleverlaan CJ; de Lange J; Hoekema A
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2021 May; 59(4):466-471. PubMed ID: 33468331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: setback surgery.
Brasileiro BF; Grotta-Grempel R; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Apr; 70(4):941-51. PubMed ID: 21752510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of the mandibular plane and magnitude of the movement in sagittal split ramus osteotomy: an in vitro study.
de Assis GM; Dos Santos VDB; Queiroz SIML; Germano AR
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Dec; 26(4):625-631. PubMed ID: 35001178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of sagittal split osteotomy fixation with a specifically designed miniplate.
Pereira Filho VA; Iamashita HY; Monnazzi MS; Gabrielli MF; Vaz LG; Passeri LA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 42(3):316-20. PubMed ID: 22898312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fixation methods in sagittal split ramus osteotomy: a systematic review on in vitro biomechanical assessments.
Kuik K; De Ruiter MHT; De Lange J; Hoekema A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2019 Jan; 48(1):56-70. PubMed ID: 30017569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of modified plating techniques for bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular advancement.
Sener I; Arıcı S; Bereket C; Tek M
J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 23(5):1573-6. PubMed ID: 22976664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An in vitro evaluation of rigid internal fixation techniques for sagittal split ramus osteotomies: advancement surgery.
Brasileiro BF; Grempel RG; Ambrosano GM; Passeri LA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 67(4):809-17. PubMed ID: 19304039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the rigidity of sagittal split ramus osteotomy fixation using four designs of biodegradable and titanium plates--a numerical study.
Albougha S; Albogha MH; Darwich MA; Darwich K
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 19(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 25784154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Which kind of miniplate to use in mandibular sagittal split osteotomy? An in vitro study.
Ribeiro-Junior PD; Magro-Filho O; Shastri KA; Papageorge MB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Nov; 41(11):1369-73. PubMed ID: 22658672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative study of biomechanical stability of resorbable and titanium fixation systems after sagittal split ramus osteotomy with a novel designed in-vitro testing unit.
Ulu M; Soylu E; Kelebek S; Dikici S; Oflaz H
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2018 Feb; 46(2):299-304. PubMed ID: 29295797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro biomechanical evaluation of fixation methods of sagittal split ramus osteotomy in mandibular setback.
Oh JS; Kim SG
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Mar; 43(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 25550092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A biomechanical evaluation of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy fixation techniques.
Peterson GP; Haug RH; Van Sickels J
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Sep; 63(9):1317-24. PubMed ID: 16122596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. In vitro comparison of fixation methods used in sagittal split osteotomy with a major advancement and counterclockwise rotation.
Geçkil N; Can Tukel H
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Jun; 60(5):617-622. PubMed ID: 35065834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
