These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28634042)

  • 1. Routine Ultrasound Quality Assurance in a Multi-Unit Radiology Department: A Retrospective Evaluation of Transducer Failures.
    Vitikainen AM; Peltonen JI; Vartiainen E
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 43(9):1930-1937. PubMed ID: 28634042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigation of the suitability of tissue phantoms for testing the constancy of ultrasonic transducer arrays in quality assurance.
    Rosenfeld E; Wolter S; Kopp A; Liebscher E
    Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):289-94. PubMed ID: 22576698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Four-year experience with a clinical ultrasound quality control program.
    Hangiandreou NJ; Stekel SF; Tradup DJ; Gorny KR; King DM
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 37(8):1350-7. PubMed ID: 21683511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Key performance parameters of a contemporary diagnostic ultrasound transducer.
    Moore GW
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2010; 44(3):231-3. PubMed ID: 20715353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ultrasound transducer function: annual testing is not sufficient.
    Mårtensson M; Olsson M; Brodin LÅ
    Eur J Echocardiogr; 2010 Oct; 11(9):801-5. PubMed ID: 20530601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simple uniformity test for ultrasound phased arrays.
    Dudley NJ; Woolley DJ
    Phys Med; 2016 Sep; 32(9):1162-6. PubMed ID: 27546869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quality assurance in diagnostic ultrasound.
    Sipilä O; Mannila V; Vartiainen E
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):519-25. PubMed ID: 21144687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A review of two alternative ultrasound quality assurance programmes.
    Dudley NJ; Griffith K; Houldsworth G; Holloway M; Dunn MA
    Eur J Ultrasound; 2001 Mar; 12(3):233-45. PubMed ID: 11423248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of ultrasound quality assurance phantom measurements from matched and mixed scanner-transducer combinations.
    Tradup DJ; Hangiandreou NJ; Taubel JP
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2003; 4(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 12841795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High incidence of defective ultrasound transducers in use in routine clinical practice.
    Mårtensson M; Olsson M; Segall B; Fraser AG; Winter R; Brodin LA
    Eur J Echocardiogr; 2009 May; 10(3):389-94. PubMed ID: 18945726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Method for automatic detection of defective ultrasound linear array transducers based on uniformity assessment of clinical images - A case study.
    Lorentsson R; Hosseini N; Johansson JO; Rosenberg W; Stenborg B; Månsson LG; Båth M
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Mar; 19(2):265-274. PubMed ID: 29322614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reproducibility of phantom-based quality assurance parameters in real-time ultrasound imaging.
    Sipilä O; Blomqvist P; Jauhiainen M; Kilpeläinen T; Malaska P; Mannila V; Vinnurva-Jussila T; Virsula S
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Jul; 52(6):665-9. PubMed ID: 21508202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality assurance for abdominal CT: a rapid, computer-assisted technique.
    Pomerantz SM; Daly B; Krebs TL; NessAiver M; Kepes SY; Wong JJ; Severson M; Siegler C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1141-5. PubMed ID: 8911167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Blinded Comparison between an In-Air Reverberation Method and an Electronic Probe Tester in the Detection of Ultrasound Probe Faults.
    Dudley NJ; Woolley DJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Dec; 43(12):2954-2958. PubMed ID: 28967500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A novel quality assurance method in a university teaching paediatric radiology department.
    Gallet JM; Reed MH; Hlady J
    Br J Radiol; 2000 Aug; 73(872):843-6. PubMed ID: 11026859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quality assurance of ultrasound systems: current status and review of literature.
    Grazhdani H; David E; Ventura Spagnolo O; Buemi F; Perri A; Orsogna N; Gigli S; Chimenz R
    J Ultrasound; 2018 Sep; 21(3):173-182. PubMed ID: 29949119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How perfect are you with defective probes? Information on the results of the mini-trial on technical quality assurance during the "Ultraschall 2012" conference in Davos.
    Rosenfeld E; Jenderka KV; Kopp A; Keim V
    Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):185-8. PubMed ID: 23558398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An audit of rejected repeated x-ray films as a quality assurance element in a radiology department.
    Eze KC; Omodia N; Okegbunam B; Adewonyi T; Nzotta CC
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2008 Dec; 11(4):355-8. PubMed ID: 19320410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment.
    Thijssen JM; Weijers G; de Korte CL
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 33(3):460-71. PubMed ID: 17275983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Image Analysis for Ultrasound Quality Assurance.
    Aljahdali MH; Woodman A; Al-Jamea L; Albatati SM; Williams C
    Ultrason Imaging; 2021 May; 43(3):113-123. PubMed ID: 33588705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.