262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28634154)
1. Improving Consensus Scoring of Crowdsourced Data Using the Rasch Model: Development and Refinement of a Diagnostic Instrument.
Brady CJ; Mudie LI; Wang X; Guallar E; Friedman DS
J Med Internet Res; 2017 Jun; 19(6):e222. PubMed ID: 28634154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rapid grading of fundus photographs for diabetic retinopathy using crowdsourcing.
Brady CJ; Villanti AC; Pearson JL; Kirchner TR; Gupta OP; Shah CP
J Med Internet Res; 2014 Oct; 16(10):e233. PubMed ID: 25356929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Crowdsourcing to Evaluate Fundus Photographs for the Presence of Glaucoma.
Wang X; Mudie LI; Baskaran M; Cheng CY; Alward WL; Friedman DS; Brady CJ
J Glaucoma; 2017 Jun; 26(6):505-510. PubMed ID: 28319525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A Virtual Reading Center Model Using Crowdsourcing to Grade Photographs for Trachoma: Validation Study.
Brady CJ; Cockrell RC; Aldrich LR; Wolle MA; West SK
J Med Internet Res; 2023 Apr; 25():e41233. PubMed ID: 37023420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Crowdsourcing as a novel technique for retinal fundus photography classification: analysis of images in the EPIC Norfolk cohort on behalf of the UK Biobank Eye and Vision Consortium.
Mitry D; Peto T; Hayat S; Morgan JE; Khaw KT; Foster PJ
PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e71154. PubMed ID: 23990935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity of Online Screening for Autism: Crowdsourcing Study Comparing Paid and Unpaid Diagnostic Tasks.
Washington P; Kalantarian H; Tariq Q; Schwartz J; Dunlap K; Chrisman B; Varma M; Ning M; Kline A; Stockham N; Paskov K; Voss C; Haber N; Wall DP
J Med Internet Res; 2019 May; 21(5):e13668. PubMed ID: 31124463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of automated screening for referable diabetic retinopathy with the IDx-DR device in the Hoorn Diabetes Care System.
van der Heijden AA; Abramoff MD; Verbraak F; van Hecke MV; Liem A; Nijpels G
Acta Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 96(1):63-68. PubMed ID: 29178249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Crowdsourcing and Automated Retinal Image Analysis for Diabetic Retinopathy.
Mudie LI; Wang X; Friedman DS; Brady CJ
Curr Diab Rep; 2017 Sep; 17(11):106. PubMed ID: 28942485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy and reliability of retinal photo grading for diabetic retinopathy: Remote graders from a developing country and standard retinal photo grader in Australia.
Islam FMA
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179310. PubMed ID: 28632764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated Identification of Diabetic Retinopathy Using Deep Learning.
Gargeya R; Leng T
Ophthalmology; 2017 Jul; 124(7):962-969. PubMed ID: 28359545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs.
Gulshan V; Peng L; Coram M; Stumpe MC; Wu D; Narayanaswamy A; Venugopalan S; Widner K; Madams T; Cuadros J; Kim R; Raman R; Nelson PC; Mega JL; Webster DR
JAMA; 2016 Dec; 316(22):2402-2410. PubMed ID: 27898976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Performance and Limitation of Machine Learning Algorithms for Diabetic Retinopathy Screening: Meta-analysis.
Wu JH; Liu TYA; Hsu WT; Ho JH; Lee CC
J Med Internet Res; 2021 Jul; 23(7):e23863. PubMed ID: 34407500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automated analysis of retinal images for detection of referable diabetic retinopathy.
Abràmoff MD; Folk JC; Han DP; Walker JD; Williams DF; Russell SR; Massin P; Cochener B; Gain P; Tang L; Lamard M; Moga DC; Quellec G; Niemeijer M
JAMA Ophthalmol; 2013 Mar; 131(3):351-7. PubMed ID: 23494039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Accuracy and Reliability of Crowdsource Annotations of Digital Retinal Images.
Mitry D; Zutis K; Dhillon B; Peto T; Hayat S; Khaw KT; Morgan JE; Moncur W; Trucco E; Foster PJ;
Transl Vis Sci Technol; 2016 Sep; 5(5):6. PubMed ID: 27668130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Crowdsourcing for Machine Learning in Public Health Surveillance: Lessons Learned From Amazon Mechanical Turk.
Shakeri Hossein Abad Z; Butler GP; Thompson W; Lee J
J Med Internet Res; 2022 Jan; 24(1):e28749. PubMed ID: 35040794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Web 2.0-based crowdsourcing for high-quality gold standard development in clinical natural language processing.
Zhai H; Lingren T; Deleger L; Li Q; Kaiser M; Stoutenborough L; Solti I
J Med Internet Res; 2013 Apr; 15(4):e73. PubMed ID: 23548263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of automated image analysis software for the detection of diabetic retinopathy to reduce the ophthalmologists' workload.
Soto-Pedre E; Navea A; Millan S; Hernaez-Ortega MC; Morales J; Desco MC; Pérez P
Acta Ophthalmol; 2015 Feb; 93(1):e52-6. PubMed ID: 24975456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation and tuning of in situ transcriptomics image processing workflows with crowdsourced annotations.
Vo-Phamhi JM; Yamauchi KA; Gómez-Sjöberg R
PLoS Comput Biol; 2021 Aug; 17(8):e1009274. PubMed ID: 34370726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Crowdsourcing a normative natural language dataset: a comparison of Amazon Mechanical Turk and in-lab data collection.
Saunders DR; Bex PJ; Woods RL
J Med Internet Res; 2013 May; 15(5):e100. PubMed ID: 23689038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Crowdsourcing image annotation for nucleus detection and segmentation in computational pathology: evaluating experts, automated methods, and the crowd.
Irshad H; Montaser-Kouhsari L; Waltz G; Bucur O; Nowak JA; Dong F; Knoblauch NW; Beck AH
Pac Symp Biocomput; 2015; ():294-305. PubMed ID: 25592590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
