410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28635096)
1. What happens to your submission at Australasian Journal on Ageing?
Parkinson L; Sims J
Australas J Ageing; 2017 Jun; 36(2):87-88. PubMed ID: 28635096
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact, quality and inclusiveness in Australasian Journal on Ageing.
Parkinson L
Australas J Ageing; 2017 Mar; 36(1):8. PubMed ID: 28326687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Getting published in Australasian Journal on Ageing.
Parkinson L
Australas J Ageing; 2016 Jun; 35(2):81. PubMed ID: 27324862
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. So you want to publish your research in the Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis?
Greaves M
J Thromb Haemost; 2017 Mar; 15(3):405-410. PubMed ID: 27966273
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. European Urology: serving our readership through systematic peer review, use of reporting standards, and encouragement of postpublication review.
Catto JW; Cooperberg MR; Cornu JN; Gratzke C; Novara G; Shariat SF; Vickers A
Eur Urol; 2015 Feb; 67(2):188-90. PubMed ID: 25175422
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Useful reviews.
Parkinson L
Australas J Ageing; 2018 Jun; 37(2):87. PubMed ID: 29870147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Scientific reporting guidelines].
Nylenna M
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2009 Nov; 129(22):2340. PubMed ID: 19935931
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Independence Day.
Heinemann MK
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Mar; 65(2):73. PubMed ID: 28282657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Peer Review in Transplantation.
Hutchinson JA
Transplantation; 2015 Sep; 99(9):1746-8. PubMed ID: 26308410
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Your role and responsibilities in the manuscript peer review process.
Brazeau GA; Dipiro JT; Fincham JE; Boucher BA; Tracy TS
Am J Pharm Educ; 2008 Jun; 72(3):69. PubMed ID: 18698392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. How to review a paper for Heart.
Otto CM
Heart; 2015 Jan; 101(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 25502328
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Update on the Manuscript Peer Review Process.
Elmore SA
Toxicol Pathol; 2017 Dec; 45(8):1028-1031. PubMed ID: 29145784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Fortifying the external peer review: an editorial perspective.
Sohail S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2015 Jan; 25(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 25604359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality and peer review of research: an adjudicating role for editors.
Newton DP
Account Res; 2010 May; 17(3):130-45. PubMed ID: 20461569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reviewing scientific manuscripts: A comprehensive guide for peer reviewers.
Brown LM; David EA; Karamlou T; Nason KS
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2017 Jun; 153(6):1609-1614. PubMed ID: 28526112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ongoing and new challenges of our journal.
von Eckardstein A; Negrini S
Atherosclerosis; 2018 Feb; 269():252-253. PubMed ID: 29439804
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Why we should reward peer reviewers.
Maffia P
Cardiovasc Res; 2018 Apr; 114(5):e30-e31. PubMed ID: 29590390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Continuing the Terra Firma and Establishing a New EQUATOR for Anesthesia & Analgesia.
Pittet JF; Vetter TR
Anesth Analg; 2016 Jul; 123(1):8-9. PubMed ID: 27183374
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Being a Great Reviewer: Remembering the "Why".
Moliterno DJ
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 11(20):2130-2131. PubMed ID: 30336820
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Preprints and Cardiovascular Science: Prescient or Premature?
Nallamothu BK; Hill JA
Circulation; 2017 Sep; 136(13):1177-1179. PubMed ID: 28912371
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
