These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28635504)

  • 1. Applying Rasch model analysis in the development of the cantonese tone identification test (CANTIT).
    Lee KYS; Lam JHS; Chan KTY; van Hasselt CA; Tong MCF
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S60-S73. PubMed ID: 28635504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Tone perception in Mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implants.
    Li G; Soli SD; Zheng Y
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S49-S59. PubMed ID: 28532185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of list equivalency for Mandarin speech materials to use with cochlear implant listeners.
    Li Y; Wang S; Su Q; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S31-S40. PubMed ID: 27414242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Lexical tone recognition in noise in normal-hearing children and prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.
    Mao Y; Xu L
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S23-S30. PubMed ID: 27564095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bimodal benefits in Mandarin-speaking cochlear implant users with contralateral residual acoustic hearing.
    Yang HI; Zeng FG
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S17-S22. PubMed ID: 28485635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Speech perception in Mandarin-speaking children with cochlear implants: A systematic review.
    Chen Y; Wong LLN
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S7-S16. PubMed ID: 28296526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lexical tone perception in native speakers of Cantonese.
    Lee KY; Chan KT; Lam JH; van Hasselt CA; Tong MC
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2015 Feb; 17(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 24780063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving speech-in-noise recognition for children with hearing loss: potential effects of language abilities, binaural summation, and head shadow.
    Nittrouer S; Caldwell-Tarr A; Tarr E; Lowenstein JH; Rice C; Moberly AC
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Aug; 52(8):513-25. PubMed ID: 23834373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preliminary evaluation of a novel non-linear frequency compression scheme for use in children.
    Wolfe J; Duke M; Schafer EC; Rehmann J; Jha S; Allegro Baumann S; John A; Jones C
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Dec; 56(12):976-988. PubMed ID: 28851244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cantonese Tone Perception for Children Who Use a Hearing Aid and a Cochlear Implant in Opposite Ears.
    Mok M; Holt CM; Lee KYS; Dowell RC; Vogel AP
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):e359-e368. PubMed ID: 28678079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lexical tone perception ability of profoundly hearing-impaired children: performance of cochlear implant and hearing aid users.
    Lee KY; van Hasselt CA; Tong MC
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Sep; 31(7):1079-87. PubMed ID: 20634774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Results using the OPAL strategy in Mandarin speaking cochlear implant recipients.
    Vandali AE; Dawson PW; Arora K
    Int J Audiol; 2017; 56(sup2):S74-S85. PubMed ID: 27329178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Avoiding disconnection: An evaluation of telephone options for cochlear implant users.
    Marcrum SC; Picou EM; Steffens T
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Mar; 56(3):186-193. PubMed ID: 27809627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Voice emotion recognition by cochlear-implanted children and their normally-hearing peers.
    Chatterjee M; Zion DJ; Deroche ML; Burianek BA; Limb CJ; Goren AP; Kulkarni AM; Christensen JA
    Hear Res; 2015 Apr; 322():151-62. PubMed ID: 25448167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An Australian version of the acceptable noise level test and its predictive value for successful hearing aid use in an older population.
    Walravens E; Keidser G; Hartley D; Hickson L
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53 Suppl 1():S52-9. PubMed ID: 24447234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deactivating stimulation sites based on low-rate thresholds improves spectral ripple and speech reception thresholds in cochlear implant users.
    Zhou N
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):EL243. PubMed ID: 28372106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spoken language and everyday functioning in 5-year-old children using hearing aids or cochlear implants.
    Cupples L; Ching TY; Button L; Seeto M; Zhang V; Whitfield J; Gunnourie M; Martin L; Marnane V
    Int J Audiol; 2018 May; 57(sup2):S55-S69. PubMed ID: 28899200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The separation between music and speech: evidence from the perception of Cantonese tones.
    Mok PK; Zuo D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2711-20. PubMed ID: 23039463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does the acceptable noise level (ANL) predict hearing-aid use?
    Olsen SØ; Brännström KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Jan; 53(1):2-20. PubMed ID: 24219089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.