398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28635678)
1. Evaluation of Classifier Performance for Multiclass Phenotype Discrimination in Untargeted Metabolomics.
Trainor PJ; DeFilippis AP; Rai SN
Metabolites; 2017 Jun; 7(2):. PubMed ID: 28635678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparative evaluation of the generalised predictive ability of eight machine learning algorithms across ten clinical metabolomics data sets for binary classification.
Mendez KM; Reinke SN; Broadhurst DI
Metabolomics; 2019 Nov; 15(12):150. PubMed ID: 31728648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A tutorial review: Metabolomics and partial least squares-discriminant analysis--a marriage of convenience or a shotgun wedding.
Gromski PS; Muhamadali H; Ellis DI; Xu Y; Correa E; Turner ML; Goodacre R
Anal Chim Acta; 2015 Jun; 879():10-23. PubMed ID: 26002472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative evaluation of classifiers in the presence of statistical interactions between features in high dimensional data settings.
Guo Y; Balasubramanian R
Int J Biostat; 2012 Jun; 8(1):Article 17. PubMed ID: 22752837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Classifier design for computer-aided diagnosis: effects of finite sample size on the mean performance of classical and neural network classifiers.
Chan HP; Sahiner B; Wagner RF; Petrick N
Med Phys; 1999 Dec; 26(12):2654-68. PubMed ID: 10619251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bias in error estimation when using cross-validation for model selection.
Varma S; Simon R
BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Feb; 7():91. PubMed ID: 16504092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A screening test proposal for congenital defects based on maternal serum metabolomics profile.
Troisi J; Lombardi M; Scala G; Cavallo P; Tayler RS; Symes SJK; Richards SM; Adair DC; Fasano A; McCowan LM; Guida M
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2023 Mar; 228(3):342.e1-342.e12. PubMed ID: 36075482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Performance of machine learning methods in diagnosing Parkinson's disease based on dysphonia measures.
Lahmiri S; Dawson DA; Shmuel A
Biomed Eng Lett; 2018 Feb; 8(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 30603188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mammographic masses characterization based on localized texture and dataset fractal analysis using linear, neural and support vector machine classifiers.
Mavroforakis ME; Georgiou HV; Dimitropoulos N; Cavouras D; Theodoridis S
Artif Intell Med; 2006 Jun; 37(2):145-62. PubMed ID: 16716579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of finite sample size on feature selection and classification: a simulation study.
Way TW; Sahiner B; Hadjiiski LM; Chan HP
Med Phys; 2010 Feb; 37(2):907-20. PubMed ID: 20229900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Local classification: Locally weighted-partial least squares-discriminant analysis (LW-PLS-DA).
Bevilacqua M; Marini F
Anal Chim Acta; 2014 Aug; 838():20-30. PubMed ID: 25064239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Direct Kernel Perceptron (DKP): ultra-fast kernel ELM-based classification with non-iterative closed-form weight calculation.
Fernández-Delgado M; Cernadas E; Barro S; Ribeiro J; Neves J
Neural Netw; 2014 Feb; 50():60-71. PubMed ID: 24287336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multi-scaled morphological features for the characterization of mammographic masses using statistical classification schemes.
Georgiou H; Mavroforakis M; Dimitropoulos N; Cavouras D; Theodoridis S
Artif Intell Med; 2007 Sep; 41(1):39-55. PubMed ID: 17714924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of methods for three-class mammograms classification.
Milosevic M; Jovanovic Z; Jankovic D
Technol Health Care; 2017 Aug; 25(4):657-670. PubMed ID: 28436405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Primal-dual for classification with rejection (PD-CR): a novel method for classification and feature selection-an application in metabolomics studies.
Chardin D; Humbert O; Bailleux C; Burel-Vandenbos F; Rigau V; Pourcher T; Barlaud M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Dec; 22(1):594. PubMed ID: 34911437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Classification of THz pulse signals using two-dimensional cross-correlation feature extraction and non-linear classifiers.
Siuly ; Yin X; Hadjiloucas S; Zhang Y
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2016 Apr; 127():64-82. PubMed ID: 27000290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of feature extraction techniques and classifiers for finger movement recognition using surface electromyography signal.
Phukpattaranont P; Thongpanja S; Anam K; Al-Jumaily A; Limsakul C
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2018 Dec; 56(12):2259-2271. PubMed ID: 29911250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ensemble of random forests One vs. Rest classifiers for MCI and AD prediction using ANOVA cortical and subcortical feature selection and partial least squares.
Ramírez J; Górriz JM; Ortiz A; Martínez-Murcia FJ; Segovia F; Salas-Gonzalez D; Castillo-Barnes D; Illán IA; Puntonet CG;
J Neurosci Methods; 2018 May; 302():47-57. PubMed ID: 29242123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discrimination between healthy participants and people with panic disorder based on polygenic scores for psychiatric disorders and for intermediate phenotypes using machine learning.
Ohi K; Tanaka Y; Otowa T; Shimada M; Kaiya H; Nishimura F; Sasaki T; Tanii H; Shioiri T; Hara T
Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2024 Jul; 58(7):603-614. PubMed ID: 38581251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
