128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28636124)
1. The IPS-scale: A new soft tissue assessment scale for percutaneous and transcutaneous implants for bone conduction devices.
Kruyt IJ; Nelissen RC; Johansson ML; Mylanus EAM; Hol MKS
Clin Otolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 42(6):1410-1413. PubMed ID: 28636124
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of CO
Sokola M; Malec K; Brzewski P; Dobosz P
Clin Otolaryngol; 2017 Dec; 42(6):1403-1406. PubMed ID: 28544707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: linear incision technique with tissue preservation versus linear incision technique with tissue reduction.
van der Stee EHH; Strijbos RM; Bom SJH; Hol MKS
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jul; 275(7):1737-1747. PubMed ID: 29846791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Skin Necrosis After Implantation With the BAHA Attract: A Case Report and Review of the Literature.
Chen SY; Mancuso D; Lalwani AK
Otol Neurotol; 2017 Mar; 38(3):364-367. PubMed ID: 28072655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Five year clinical outcomes and evaluation following implantation of the Oticon™ wide bone anchored hearing system in 47 children.
Osborne MS; Hoskison E; Child-Hymas A; Gill J; McDermott AL
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Oct; 137():110244. PubMed ID: 32896356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: inside or outside the line of incision?
Strijbos RM; den Besten CA; Mylanus EA; Hol MK
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Nov; 273(11):3713-3722. PubMed ID: 27086360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Long-term soft tissue outcomes for hydroxyapatite-coated bone-anchored hearing implant surgery.
Kanzara T; Walijee H; Badar Sheikh R; Lau A; Temple R
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2019 Nov; 276(11):3067-3072. PubMed ID: 31451899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Soft-tissue outcomes following implantation of different types of bone conduction hearing devices in a single centre.
Ray J; Lau K; Moraleda J; Yardley M; Dawoud M; Dimitriadis PA
J Laryngol Otol; 2019 Dec; 133(12):1079-1082. PubMed ID: 31779713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical experience of bone anchored hearing aid: a case report.
Miyasaka M; Akamatsu T; Yamazaki A; Tanaka R
Tokai J Exp Clin Med; 2008 Apr; 33(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 21318959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [The bone-anchored hearing aid].
Foghsgaard S
Ugeskr Laeger; 2014 Aug; 176(33):. PubMed ID: 25293411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Complications and parent satisfaction in pediatric osseointegrated bone-conduction hearing implants.
Chan KH; Gao D; Jensen EL; Allen GC; Cass SP
Laryngoscope; 2017 Sep; 127(9):2165-2170. PubMed ID: 28092097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Experience with Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery and Linear Incision Approach for Pediatric and Adult Bone Anchored Hearing Implants.
Bezdjian A; Smith RA; Gabra N; Yang L; Bianchi M; Daniel SJ
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2020 Apr; 129(4):380-387. PubMed ID: 31771342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimally Invasive Ponto Surgery compared to the linear incision technique without soft tissue reduction for bone conduction hearing implants: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Calon TG; van Hoof M; van den Berge H; de Bruijn AJ; van Tongeren J; Hof JR; Brunings JW; Jonhede S; Anteunis LJ; Janssen M; Joore MA; Holmberg M; Johansson ML; Stokroos RJ
Trials; 2016 Nov; 17(1):540. PubMed ID: 27829464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Punch and Drill: Implantation of Bone Anchored Hearing Device Through a Minimal Skin Punch Incision Versus Implantation With Dermatome and Soft Tissue Reduction.
Dumon T; Medina M; Sperling NM
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2016 Mar; 125(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 26384503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Bone-anchored hearing aid: a comparison of surgical techniques.
van de Berg R; Stokroos RJ; Hof JR; Chenault MN
Otol Neurotol; 2010 Jan; 31(1):129-35. PubMed ID: 20019562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Revision BAHA Surgery.
Battista RA; Littlefield PD
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2006 Aug; 39(4):801-13, viii. PubMed ID: 16895786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-Year Clinical and Audiological Outcomes of Percutaneous Implants for Bone Conduction Devices: Comparison Between Tissue Preservation Technique and Tissue Reduction Technique.
Kruyt IJ; Kok H; Bosman A; Nelissen RC; Mylanus EAM; Hol MKS
Otol Neurotol; 2019 Mar; 40(3):335-343. PubMed ID: 30742596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Percutaneous versus transcutaneous bone conduction implant system: a feasibility study on a cadaver head.
Håkansson B; Eeg-Olofsson M; Reinfeldt S; Stenfelt S; Granström G
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Dec; 29(8):1132-9. PubMed ID: 18769364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Peri-implant bony overgrowth as a cause of revision surgery in auditory osseointegrated implantation.
Tompkins JJ; Petersen DK; Sharbel DD; McKinnon BJ; MacDonald CB
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Jul; 86():87-9. PubMed ID: 27260587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: dermatome versus linear incision technique.
Strijbos RM; Bom SJH; Zwerver S; Hol MKS
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Jan; 274(1):109-117. PubMed ID: 27439945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
