BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28636124)

  • 21. A comparison study of complications and initial follow-up costs of transcutaneous and percutaneous bone conduction devices.
    Godbehere J; Carr SD; Moraleda J; Edwards P; Ray J
    J Laryngol Otol; 2017 Aug; 131(8):667-670. PubMed ID: 28625187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Subdural Hematoma: A Rare Adverse Complication From Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid Placement.
    Amin N; Aymat-Torrente A
    Otol Neurotol; 2017 Mar; 38(3):360-363. PubMed ID: 28114179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Z-plasty for skin complications of bone-anchored hearing aid implantation.
    Miura MS; Rios MN
    J Laryngol Otol; 2015 Jun; 129(6):604-6. PubMed ID: 26074260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison between a new implantable transcutaneous bone conductor and percutaneous bone-conduction hearing implant.
    Hol MK; Nelissen RC; Agterberg MJ; Cremers CW; Snik AF
    Otol Neurotol; 2013 Aug; 34(6):1071-5. PubMed ID: 23598702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Skin and soft tissue complications of bone-anchored hearing aids: Introducing a new classification system.
    Costa JR; Costa S; Soares T; Feliciano T; Almeida E Sousa C; Coutinho MB
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp (Engl Ed); 2023; 74(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 37005042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Prevention and treatment of skin complications following BAHA implantation].
    Fan Y; Zhang Y; Wang Z; Wang P; Zhu XL; Yang H; Chen XW; Gao ZQ
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Oct; 48(10):798-801. PubMed ID: 24406174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Canal atresia: "surgery or implantable hearing devices? The expert's question is revisited".
    Evans AK; Kazahaya K
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Mar; 71(3):367-74. PubMed ID: 17196671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bone-anchored hearing aid surgery in older adults: implant loss and skin reactions.
    de Wolf MJ; Hol MK; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2009 Jul; 118(7):525-31. PubMed ID: 19708493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Implantable hearing devices.
    Jones S; Harris D; Estill A; Mikulec AA
    Mo Med; 2008; 105(3):235-9. PubMed ID: 18630303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Bonebridge: preclinical evaluation of a new transcutaneously-activated bone anchored hearing device.
    Huber AM; Sim JH; Xie YZ; Chatzimichalis M; Ullrich O; Röösli C
    Hear Res; 2013 Jul; 301():93-9. PubMed ID: 23467173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Amplification of transcutaneous and percutaneous bone-conduction devices with a test-band in an induced model of conductive hearing loss.
    Park MJ; Lee JR; Yang CJ; Yoo MH; Jin IS; Choi CH; Park HJ
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Nov; 55(11):653-7. PubMed ID: 27347717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bone-anchored hearing aid implant location in relation to skin reactions.
    Faber HT; de Wolf MJ; de Rooy JW; Hol MK; Cremers CW; Mylanus EA
    Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 Aug; 135(8):742-7. PubMed ID: 19687391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Laser-Doppler microvascular measurements in the peri-implant areas of different osseointegrated bone conductor implant systems.
    Jarabin J; Bere Z; Hartmann P; Tóth F; Kiss JG; Rovó L
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 272(12):3655-62. PubMed ID: 25502915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A Systematic Review on Complications of Tissue Preservation Surgical Techniques in Percutaneous Bone Conduction Hearing Devices.
    Verheij E; Bezdjian A; Grolman W; Thomeer HG
    Otol Neurotol; 2016 Aug; 37(7):829-37. PubMed ID: 27273402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bone conduction implants for amplification: comparison of results.
    Hough DA; Matthews P; Hough JV
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1997 Dec; 76(12):857, 861-2, 864-5. PubMed ID: 9431774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Skin reactions after BAHA surgery: a comparison between the U-graft technique and the BAHA dermatome.
    Stalfors J; Tjellström A
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Dec; 29(8):1109-14. PubMed ID: 18758391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Comparison of skin complications between dermatome and U-graft technique in BAHA surgery].
    Tamarit Conejeros JM; Dalmau Galofre J; Murcia Puchades V; Pons Rocher F; Fernández Martínez S; Estrems Navas P
    Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2009; 60(6):422-7. PubMed ID: 19909718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Three-week loading of the 4.5mm wide titanium implant in bone anchored hearing systems.
    Wazen JJ; Babu S; Daugherty J; Metrailer A
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2016; 37(2):132-5. PubMed ID: 26954868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. International consensus on Vibrant Soundbridge® implantation in children and adolescents.
    Cremers CW; O'Connor AF; Helms J; Roberson J; Clarós P; Frenzel H; Profant M; Schmerber S; Streitberger C; Baumgartner WD; Orfila D; Pringle M; Cenjor C; Giarbini N; Jiang D; Snik AF
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2010 Nov; 74(11):1267-9. PubMed ID: 20828837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. UK and Ireland experience of bone anchored hearing aids (BAHA) in individuals with Down syndrome.
    Sheehan PZ; Hans PS
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 70(6):981-6. PubMed ID: 16310862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.