These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28636564)
1. Radiation dosimetry in magnetic fields with Farmer-type ionization chambers: determination of magnetic field correction factors for different magnetic field strengths and field orientations. Spindeldreier CK; Schrenk O; Bakenecker A; Kawrakow I; Burigo L; Karger CP; Greilich S; Pfaffenberger A Phys Med Biol; 2017 Aug; 62(16):6708-6728. PubMed ID: 28636564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Monte Carlo study of ionization chamber magnetic field correction factors as a function of angle and beam quality. Malkov VN; Rogers DWO Med Phys; 2018 Feb; 45(2):908-925. PubMed ID: 29218730 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Experimental and Monte Carlo-based determination of magnetic field correction factors Alissa M; Zink K; Kapsch RP; Schoenfeld AA; Frick S; Czarnecki D Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 50(7):4578-4589. PubMed ID: 36897832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental measurement of ionization chamber angular response and associated magnetic field correction factors in MR-linac. Iakovenko V; Keller B; Sahgal A; Sarfehnia A Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1940-1948. PubMed ID: 31955432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A finite element method for the determination of the relative response of ionization chambers in MR-linacs: simulation and experimental validation up to 1.5 T. Pojtinger S; Kapsch RP; Dohm OS; Thorwarth D Phys Med Biol; 2019 Jul; 64(13):135011. PubMed ID: 31181560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Experimental determination of magnetic field correction factors for ionization chambers in parallel and perpendicular orientations. Pojtinger S; Nachbar M; Ghandour S; Pisaturo O; Pachoud M; Kapsch RP; Thorwarth D Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(24):245044. PubMed ID: 33181493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The role of the construction and sensitive volume of compact ionization chambers on the magnetic field-dependent dose response. Delfs B; Blum I; Tekin T; Schönfeld AB; Kranzer R; Poppinga D; Giesen U; Langner F; Kapsch RP; Poppe B; Looe HK Med Phys; 2021 Aug; 48(8):4572-4585. PubMed ID: 34032298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetry in 1.5 T MR-Linacs: Monte Carlo determination of magnetic field correction factors and investigation of the air gap effect. Margaroni V; Pappas EP; Episkopakis A; Pantelis E; Papagiannis P; Marinos N; Karaiskos P Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):1132-1148. PubMed ID: 36349535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of magnetic fields on dose measurement with small ion chambers illustrated in high-resolution response maps. Lehmann J; Beveridge T; Oliver C; Bailey TE; Lye JE; Livingstone J; Stevenson AW; Butler DJ Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 46(7):3298-3305. PubMed ID: 31087374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Technical Note: Consistency of PTW30013 and FC65-G ion chamber magnetic field correction factors. Woodings SJ; van Asselen B; van Soest TL; de Prez LA; Lagendijk JJW; Raaymakers BW; Wolthaus JWH Med Phys; 2019 Aug; 46(8):3739-3745. PubMed ID: 31131902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reference dosimetry in magnetic fields: formalism and ionization chamber correction factors. O'Brien DJ; Roberts DA; Ibbott GS; Sawakuchi GO Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4915. PubMed ID: 27487908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dose response of selected ion chambers in applied homogeneous transverse and longitudinal magnetic fields. Reynolds M; Fallone BG; Rathee S Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):042102. PubMed ID: 23556912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Carbon ion beam dosimetry in magnetic fields using Farmer-type ionization chambers of different radii: measurements and simulations. Surla S; Marot M; Burigo L; Brons S; Runz A; Karger CP Phys Med Biol; 2024 Oct; 69(20):. PubMed ID: 39053512 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Small-cavity chamber dose response in megavoltage photon beams coupled to magnetic fields. Cervantes Y; Billas I; Shipley D; Duane S; Bouchard H Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(24):245008. PubMed ID: 32674077 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental determination of magnetic field quality conversion factors for eleven ionization chambers in 1.5 T and 0.35 T MR-linac systems. Orlando N; Crosby J; Glide-Hurst C; Culberson W; Keller B; Sarfehnia A Med Phys; 2024 Apr; 51(4):2998-3009. PubMed ID: 38060696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 2D convolution kernels of ionization chambers used for photon-beam dosimetry in magnetic fields: the advantage of small over large chamber dimensions. Looe HK; Delfs B; Poppinga D; Harder D; Poppe B Phys Med Biol; 2018 Mar; 63(7):075013. PubMed ID: 29516870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sensitive volume effects on Monte Carlo calculated ion chamber response in magnetic fields. Malkov VN; Rogers DWO Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4854-4858. PubMed ID: 28636763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Monte Carlo investigation of electron fluence perturbation in MRI-guided radiotherapy beams using six commercial radiation detectors. Cervantes Y; Duane S; Bouchard H Phys Med Biol; 2022 Jan; 67(3):. PubMed ID: 35026745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proton dosimetry in a magnetic field: Measurement and calculation of magnetic field correction factors for a plane-parallel ionization chamber. Gebauer B; Baumann KS; Fuchs H; Georg D; Oborn BM; Looe HK; Lühr A Med Phys; 2024 Mar; 51(3):2293-2305. PubMed ID: 37898105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]