214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28638218)
21. Expanding the view of a standard colonoscope with the Third Eye Panoramic cap.
Rubin M; Lurie L; Bose K; Kim SH
World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Oct; 21(37):10683-7. PubMed ID: 26457029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Timed screening colonoscopy: a randomized trial of two colonoscopic withdrawal techniques.
Coghlan E; Laferrere L; Zenon E; Marini JM; Rainero G; San Roman A; Posadas Martinez ML; Nadales A
Surg Endosc; 2020 Mar; 34(3):1200-1205. PubMed ID: 31144121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique.
East JE; Stavrindis M; Thomas-Gibson S; Guenther T; Tekkis PP; Saunders BP
Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Sep; 28(6):768-76. PubMed ID: 18715401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Emerging technological advancements in colonoscopy: Third Eye® Retroscope® and Third Eye® Panoramic(TM) , Fuse® Full Spectrum Endoscopy® colonoscopy platform, Extra-Wide-Angle-View colonoscope, and NaviAid(TM) G-EYE(TM) balloon colonoscope.
Gralnek IM
Dig Endosc; 2015 Jan; 27(2):223-31. PubMed ID: 25251748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Impact of 2 generational improvements in colonoscopes on adenoma miss rates: results of a prospective randomized multicenter tandem study.
Pioche M; Denis A; Allescher HD; Andrisani G; Costamagna G; Dekker E; Fockens P; Gerges C; Groth S; Kandler J; Lienhart I; Neuhaus H; Petruzziello L; Schachschal G; Tytgat K; Wallner J; Weingart V; Touzet S; Ponchon T; Rösch T
Gastrointest Endosc; 2018 Jul; 88(1):107-116. PubMed ID: 29410020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rate during colonoscopy: the TERRACE study.
Leufkens AM; DeMarco DC; Rastogi A; Akerman PA; Azzouzi K; Rothstein RI; Vleggaar FP; Repici A; Rando G; Okolo PI; Dewit O; Ignjatovic A; Odstrcil E; East J; Deprez PH; Saunders BP; Kalloo AN; Creel B; Singh V; Lennon AM; Siersema PD;
Gastrointest Endosc; 2011 Mar; 73(3):480-9. PubMed ID: 21067735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of the Third Eye retrograde auxiliary imaging system during colonoscopy.
Triadafilopoulos G; Li J
Endoscopy; 2008 Jun; 40(6):478-82. PubMed ID: 18543136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Meta-analysis of the performance of ultrathin vs. standard colonoscopes.
Sofi AA; Nawras A; Khan MA; Howden CW; Lee WM
Endoscopy; 2017 Apr; 49(4):351-358. PubMed ID: 27852099
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Capsule endoscopy for colorectal cancer and polyp screening.
Pascu O; Ciobanu L
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis; 2013 Sep; 22(3):257-9. PubMed ID: 24078980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Wide angle colonoscopy with a prototype instrument: impact on miss rates and efficiency as determined by back-to-back colonoscopies.
Rex DK; Chadalawada V; Helper DJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Sep; 98(9):2000-5. PubMed ID: 14499778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of adenoma detection rate between high-definition colonoscopes with different fields of view: 170 degrees versus 140 degrees.
Moon SY; Lee JY; Lee JH
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Jan; 102(2):e32675. PubMed ID: 36637919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Technological advances for improving adenoma detection rates: The changing face of colonoscopy.
Ishaq S; Siau K; Harrison E; Tontini GE; Hoffman A; Gross S; Kiesslich R; Neumann H
Dig Liver Dis; 2017 Jul; 49(7):721-727. PubMed ID: 28454854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Endocuff Vision-assisted colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial.
Jacob A; Schafer A; Yong J; Tonkin D; Rodda D; Eteuati J; Ganesh S; Hewett P
ANZ J Surg; 2019 May; 89(5):E174-E178. PubMed ID: 30896062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Endoscopic detection of colorectal adenomas: standards and sophisticated methods.
Anders M
Dig Dis; 2012; 30 Suppl 2():68-73. PubMed ID: 23207935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A novel balloon colonoscope detects significantly more simulated polyps than a standard colonoscope in a colon model.
Hasan N; Gross SA; Gralnek IM; Pochapin M; Kiesslich R; Halpern Z
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Dec; 80(6):1135-40. PubMed ID: 24929483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. New-Generation High-Definition Colonoscopes Increase Adenoma Detection when Screening a Moderate-Risk Population for Colorectal Cancer.
Bond A; O'Toole P; Fisher G; Subramanian S; Haslam N; Probert C; Cox T; Sarkar S
Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2017 Mar; 16(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 27528514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A randomized controlled trial assessing the effect of prescribed patient position changes during colonoscope withdrawal on adenoma detection.
Ou G; Kim E; Lakzadeh P; Tong J; Enns R; Ramji A; Whittaker S; Ko HH; Bressler B; Halparin L; Lam E; Amar J; Telford J
Gastrointest Endosc; 2014 Aug; 80(2):277-83. PubMed ID: 24629419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Challenges Facing the Detection of Colonic Polyps: What Can Deep Learning Do?
Azer SA
Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Aug; 55(8):. PubMed ID: 31409050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Retrograde inspection
Rath T; Pfeifer L; Neufert C; Kremer A; Leppkes M; Hoffman A; Neurath MF; Zopf S
World J Gastroenterol; 2020 Apr; 26(16):1962-1970. PubMed ID: 32390706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Feasibility of a novel colonoscope with extra-wide angle of view: a clinical study.
Uraoka T; Tanaka S; Oka S; Matsuda T; Saito Y; Moriyama T; Higashi R; Matsumoto T
Endoscopy; 2015 May; 47(5):444-8. PubMed ID: 25412088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
