These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28639012)

  • 1. The effect of social learning on avoidance of aposematic prey in juvenile great tits (Parus major).
    Landová E; Hotová Svádová K; Fuchs R; Štys P; Exnerová A
    Anim Cogn; 2017 Sep; 20(5):855-866. PubMed ID: 28639012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Social learning within and across predator species reduces attacks on novel aposematic prey.
    Hämäläinen L; Mappes J; Rowland HM; Teichmann M; Thorogood R
    J Anim Ecol; 2020 May; 89(5):1153-1164. PubMed ID: 32077104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Personality matters: individual variation in reactions of naive bird predators to aposematic prey.
    Exnerová A; Svádová KH; Fucíková E; Drent P; Stys P
    Proc Biol Sci; 2010 Mar; 277(1682):723-8. PubMed ID: 19889698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Through experience to boldness? Deactivation of neophobia towards novel and aposematic prey in three European species of tits (Paridae).
    Adamová-Ježová D; Hospodková E; Fuchsová L; Štys P; Exnerová A
    Behav Processes; 2016 Oct; 131():24-31. PubMed ID: 27474371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Social transmission of avoidance among predators facilitates the spread of novel prey.
    Thorogood R; Kokko H; Mappes J
    Nat Ecol Evol; 2018 Feb; 2(2):254-261. PubMed ID: 29255302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predator experience on cryptic prey affects the survival of conspicuous aposematic prey.
    Lindström L; Alatalo RV; Lyytinen A; Mappes J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Feb; 268(1465):357-61. PubMed ID: 11270431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Higher survival of an aposematic than of a cryptic form of a distasteful bug.
    Sillén-Tullberg B
    Oecologia; 1985 Oct; 67(3):411-415. PubMed ID: 28311576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The ability of lizards to identify an artificial Batesian mimic.
    Beneš J; Veselý P
    Zoology (Jena); 2017 Aug; 123():46-52. PubMed ID: 28716358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Prey community structure affects how predators select for Mullerian mimicry.
    Ihalainen E; Rowland HM; Speed MP; Ruxton GD; Mappes J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2012 Jun; 279(1736):2099-105. PubMed ID: 22237908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Birds learn to avoid aposematic prey by using the appearance of host plants.
    McLellan CF; Scott-Samuel NE; Cuthill IC
    Curr Biol; 2021 Dec; 31(23):5364-5369.e4. PubMed ID: 34624210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Strong antiapostatic selection against novel rare aposematic prey.
    Lindström L; Alatalo RV; Lyytinen A; Mappes J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2001 Jul; 98(16):9181-4. PubMed ID: 11459937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The signal detection problem of aposematic prey revisited: integrating prior social and personal experience.
    Hämäläinen L; Thorogood R
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2020 Jul; 375(1802):20190473. PubMed ID: 32420858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating Müllerian mimicry: predator learning and variation in prey defences.
    Ihalainen E; Lindström L; Mappes J
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Mar; 20(2):780-91. PubMed ID: 17305843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evidence for a peak-shift in predator generalization among aposematic prey.
    Gamberale G; Tullberg BS
    Proc Biol Sci; 1996 Oct; 263(1375):1329-34. PubMed ID: 8914330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Body size matters for aposematic prey during predator aversion learning.
    Smith KE; Halpin CG; Rowe C
    Behav Processes; 2014 Nov; 109 Pt B():173-9. PubMed ID: 25256160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Avian predators attack aposematic prey more forcefully when they are part of an aggregation.
    Skelhorn J; Ruxton GD
    Biol Lett; 2006 Dec; 2(4):488-90. PubMed ID: 17148269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evolutionary implications of the form of predator generalization for aposematic signals and mimicry in prey.
    Ruxton GD; Franks DW; Balogh AC; Leimar O
    Evolution; 2008 Nov; 62(11):2913-21. PubMed ID: 18752602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiple benefits of gregariousness cover detectability costs in aposematic aggregations.
    Riipi M; Alatalo RV; Lindström L; Mappes J
    Nature; 2001 Oct; 413(6855):512-4. PubMed ID: 11586357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Seasonal variations in bird selection pressure on prey colouration.
    Zvereva EL; Kozlov MV
    Oecologia; 2021 Aug; 196(4):1017-1026. PubMed ID: 34322748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selective prey avoidance learning in the predatory sea slug Pleurobranchaea californica.
    Noboa V; Gillette R
    J Exp Biol; 2013 Sep; 216(Pt 17):3231-6. PubMed ID: 23661778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.