These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 28639478)
1. Relation between capacity and performance in paediatric upper limb prosthesis users. Lindner H; Hiyoshi A; Hermansson L Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Feb; 42(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 28639478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of the University of New Brunswick Test of Prosthetic Function and the Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control. Burger H; Brezovar D; Vidmar G Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2014 Aug; 50(4):433-8. PubMed ID: 24476807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Categorization of compensatory motions in transradial myoelectric prosthesis users. Hussaini A; Zinck A; Kyberd P Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):286-293. PubMed ID: 27473642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Brief activity performance measure for upper limb amputees: BAM-ULA. Resnik L; Borgia M; Acluche F Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Feb; 42(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 28091278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of arm and prosthetic functioning in children with a congenital transverse reduction deficiency of the upper limb. Buffart LM; Roebroeck ME; van Heijningen VG; Pesch-Batenburg JM; Stam HJ J Rehabil Med; 2007 May; 39(5):379-86. PubMed ID: 17549329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Visualisation of upper limb activity using spirals: A new approach to the assessment of daily prosthesis usage. Chadwell A; Kenney L; Granat M; Thies S; Head JS; Galpin A Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Feb; 42(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 28650213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of standardized activities on validity of Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control. Lindner HY; Eliasson AC; Hermansson LM J Rehabil Res Dev; 2013; 50(10):1391-400. PubMed ID: 24699974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of environment: Experiences of users of myoelectric arm prosthesis-a qualitative study. Widehammar C; Pettersson I; Janeslätt G; Hermansson L Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Feb; 42(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 28470129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Upper limb activity in myoelectric prosthesis users is biased towards the intact limb and appears unrelated to goal-directed task performance. Chadwell A; Kenney L; Granat MH; Thies S; Head J; Galpin A; Baker R; Kulkarni J Sci Rep; 2018 Jul; 8(1):11084. PubMed ID: 30038402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Relationships among manual body functions, manual capacity, and bimanual performance using the prosthetic upper extremity functional index in children with congenital hand differences. Ardon MS; Janssen WG; Hovius SE; Stam HJ; Murawska M; Roebroeck ME; Selles RW Phys Ther; 2014 Jun; 94(6):767-75. PubMed ID: 24557647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Skill assessment in upper limb myoelectric prosthesis users: Validation of a clinically feasible method for characterising upper limb temporal and amplitude variability during the performance of functional tasks. Thies SB; Kenney LP; Sobuh M; Galpin A; Kyberd P; Stine R; Major MJ Med Eng Phys; 2017 Sep; 47():137-143. PubMed ID: 28684214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the validity of the prosthetic upper extremity functional index for children. Wright FV; Hubbard S; Naumann S; Jutai J Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2003 Apr; 84(4):518-27. PubMed ID: 12690590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Prosthetic Upper Extremity Functional Index: development and reliability testing of a new functional status questionnaire for children who use upper extremity prostheses. Wright FV; Hubbard S; Jutai J; Naumann S J Hand Ther; 2001; 14(2):91-104. PubMed ID: 11382260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Refined clothespin relocation test and assessment of motion. Hussaini A; Kyberd P Prosthet Orthot Int; 2017 Jun; 41(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 27473641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Age at first prosthetic fitting and later functional outcome in children and young adults with unilateral congenital below-elbow deficiency: a cross-sectional study. Huizing K; Reinders-Messelink H; Maathuis C; Hadders-Algra M; van der Sluis CK Prosthet Orthot Int; 2010 Jun; 34(2):166-74. PubMed ID: 20298129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of multi-grip myoelectric prosthetic hands on daily activities, pain-related disability and prosthesis use compared with single-grip myoelectric prostheses: A single-case study. Widehammar C; Hiyoshi A; Lidström Holmqvist K; Lindner H; Hermansson L J Rehabil Med; 2022 Jan; 54():jrm00245. PubMed ID: 34766184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of an adjustable electrode housing unit to compare electrode alignment and contact variation with myoelectric prosthesis functionality: A pilot study. Head JS; Howard D; Hutchins SW; Kenney L; Heath GH; Aksenov AY Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Feb; 40(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 25134531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term results of early myoelectric prosthesis fittings: A prospective case-control study. Sjöberg L; Lindner H; Hermansson L Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Oct; 42(5):527-533. PubMed ID: 28905686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prosthesis use in adult acquired major upper-limb amputees: patterns of wear, prosthetic skills and the actual use of prostheses in activities of daily life. Østlie K; Lesjø IM; Franklin RJ; Garfelt B; Skjeldal OH; Magnus P Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2012 Nov; 7(6):479-93. PubMed ID: 22315926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Vibrotactile grasping force and hand aperture feedback for myoelectric forearm prosthesis users. Witteveen HJ; Rietman HS; Veltink PH Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Jun; 39(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 24567348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]